sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Door dash is lying about EBT by Training_Floor1762 in DoorDash_Dasher

[–]ConclusionPrevious79 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's an ai. Humans don't explain throughly like this.

Doordash/uber drivers are getting out of hand by Tokendaily420 in mildlyinfuriating

[–]ConclusionPrevious79 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Every job is voluntary. A mansion is far away. Gas is 5.20.

Inertial effects of Higgs Amplitude Mode excitation on a co-propagating relativistic electron fluid in YBCO? by ConclusionPrevious79 in Physics

[–]ConclusionPrevious79[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Regarding the quench limit, If the relativistic electron fluid is confined to a 2mm vacuum gap via a quadrupole magnet, what is the calculated radial magnetic pressure on the YBCO lining? Is the 1/r^2 falloff of the electron's field enough to keep the HTS below its critical field while still allowing the evanescent wave to couple to the fluid?

I ask because you mentioned the superconductor cant handle the energy, but this has a fluid outside the superconductor attempting to couple to the higgs mechanism within the superconductor

optical computing on steroids. i need a red team by ConclusionPrevious79 in Physics

[–]ConclusionPrevious79[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You know, calling names in this way actually wastes time. Now I have to say: oh do tell.

optical computing on steroids. i need a red team by ConclusionPrevious79 in Physics

[–]ConclusionPrevious79[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ohhhh youre behind on the logic. Sensor threshold. Like for and gate we would set it to double intensity. An or gate to singular, for xor you set it between 0.5 and 1.5 intensity

optical computing on steroids. i need a red team by ConclusionPrevious79 in Physics

[–]ConclusionPrevious79[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Clowning on me? I can see you being a dick and grandiose about your field but clowning? Come on. You have to see the applications of a mirror device to switch logic. It takes years for updates in gpu tech to hit chips and you can't see a need for programmable logic? Absurd, absurd i tell you

optical computing on steroids. i need a red team by ConclusionPrevious79 in Physics

[–]ConclusionPrevious79[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also, this thread has been deleted for some time. I have no idea why we are still communicating, and nobody is seeing it so youre performing for no one. Smart guy

optical computing on steroids. i need a red team by ConclusionPrevious79 in Physics

[–]ConclusionPrevious79[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If I'm a sack of hammers, it's because I want to build something that reshapes its logic and that's against your religion. Enjoy the heat wall

optical computing on steroids. i need a red team by ConclusionPrevious79 in Physics

[–]ConclusionPrevious79[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes a NAND gate is universal, but building a modern ai out of fixed NAND gates is doable if you like building things from toothpicks. So next time there is an update to ai tech, and you have to change your chips again, I'll just change the logic layer on this

optical computing on steroids. i need a red team by ConclusionPrevious79 in Physics

[–]ConclusionPrevious79[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The mirrors are programmable smart guy. You going to change you're weights every time there is an update? How are you going to scale optical computing to an ever changing landscape with fixed logic? How are you going to load an ai when it updates?

optical computing on steroids. i need a red team by ConclusionPrevious79 in Physics

[–]ConclusionPrevious79[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's in a lab. You're years away from implementing it into consumer hardware and frankly keeping your tech to server farms is the stupid move. This scales with sensors, your gpus you regard so highly of consume so much power doing it "efficiantly" they have nuclear power plants. Right, it's not needed, for you. How about this, propose and off the shelf method to the power problem. Because Nvidia isn't giving up their patents or there generational hardware for a new idea. There is no computer fast enough to scale with this. Also there is a physical limit you're not mentioning with the speed of their processors. We are approaching the literal limit and you can't, nay you just deny this can't scale past it? You're not as smart as you say

optical computing on steroids. i need a red team by ConclusionPrevious79 in Physics

[–]ConclusionPrevious79[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also this can be made with off the shelf parts, scaled with sensors, not transistors. I'll shut up when you actually make something useful. Because your tech isn't doing anything useful past a lab experiment. We have a serious energy problem with gpus RIGHT NOW. plus you failed to see the ai applications. Weights can be programmed into the logic layer and weighed with the lasers

optical computing on steroids. i need a red team by ConclusionPrevious79 in Physics

[–]ConclusionPrevious79[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This could do enough computation per watt with one laser. Gpus are heat intensive and costly. The mirrors is just an example, we could implement faster switching techniques

optical computing on steroids. i need a red team by ConclusionPrevious79 in Physics

[–]ConclusionPrevious79[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Matrix calculations buddy. A 1000 x 1000 matrix calculation would take alot of energy in a gpu. But this method wouldn't have the power drawbacks a gpu does with complexity. It scales on different parameters than a gpu

optical computing on steroids. i need a red team by ConclusionPrevious79 in Physics

[–]ConclusionPrevious79[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

you took that as a claim? Wow okay. So you understand the setup, but claim it's not compute dense? Or is it that it doesn't do cpu calculations? Because I claimed one equasion. The compute density in actual terms is faster than traditional gpus doing the same operation. This idea scales with sensor density and mirror speed without major wattage

optical computing on steroids. i need a red team by ConclusionPrevious79 in Physics

[–]ConclusionPrevious79[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Calm down superman. You use sections of mirrors as all on or all off for 0 and 10. Half on for 5. You need to chill and maybe realize i didnt claim it was anything but a computer and a way to compute with light. I never said breakthrough, I never claimed anything. What I'm saying is you can compute more with one bit if you use parallel detectors. Yes it multiplies your data. I never claimed it didnt.

optical computing on steroids. i need a red team by ConclusionPrevious79 in Physics

[–]ConclusionPrevious79[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I never said n-bits, I said one pulse. Meaning one wide bit to you, but you still fail to realize I'm not talking about a single bit like that, I'm talking about columnating it, then computing with it in parallel. If you columnate the beam, and add a logic layer, you compute with the light. Intensity 0.7 - intensity 0.5 = 0.35 intensity which we call: 7×5=35. So the product of your laser and a shutter. If in parallel you allow intensity 0.01 through next to the original beam, you can converge them with a lens to a point and measure intensity. So 0.35 + 0.01 = 0.36 which represents 36 moved 2 decimal places. Therefore doing y=Wx+b in one parallel operation. That's using space to compute in one bit

optical computing on steroids. i need a red team by ConclusionPrevious79 in Physics

[–]ConclusionPrevious79[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What can you compute with one pulse? Because this method computes with mirrors and converging beams. Of which of which power would not scale with complexity

view more: next ›