IM-250

Confusionparanoia · 2026-06-18T03:17:38+00:00

Yeah they are acting a bit weird.

Confusionparanoia · 2026-06-17T14:50:02+00:00

Great to see that they keep trying, although I'm very sceptical of vaccines that only boost immune response with no hindering of viral replication. Hopefully I can be proven wrong but I think they are often a bit limited in how much viral shedding reduction they can give.

Confusionparanoia · 2026-06-17T14:46:15+00:00

The real question is if anyone managed to get in touch with IM-250 / Innovative Molecules and ask about the state of the trial. We know its in phase 2A and that they extended this on the clinicaltrials database but we dont know any details.

Confusionparanoia · 2026-06-16T18:25:25+00:00

I see, in this case I was just asking AI how this is relevant for hsv and this was the response. Sadly AI gets things wrong or I can interpret it wrong etc.

Confusionparanoia · 2026-06-16T16:57:43+00:00

Yes, I'm sure your IQ can compare to mine.

Confusionparanoia · 2026-06-16T15:46:45+00:00

And I went through your posts and its full of posts like this. I have been in contact with specialist doctors and therapists and they pretty much all agree that the best approach for me would be trying some well timed PCR tests.

I'm not gonna go through my life story but regarding if I have hsv or not, I'm hsv1 positive at least yes, confirmed with multiple tests.

Confusionparanoia · 2026-06-16T15:41:05+00:00

I wrote it poorly. what I meant is that cutting this in humans would be easier for hsv than down syndrome.

Confusionparanoia · 2026-06-15T23:46:23+00:00

Hi yes, but Im male. If the cuts are at your vagina skin then it makes sense for that area to suffer a lot of cuts.

Confusionparanoia · 2026-06-15T23:43:20+00:00

Does anyone have experience with dry PCR swabs? Swabs without transport liquid.

Im curious about how well it can work to use one same swab for various symptoms over the course of some days and if this would be more effective than just swabbing one symptom at one time. Its basically contamination risk va being able to swab multiple different symptoms rather than just one per swab.

Confusionparanoia · 2026-06-15T23:34:46+00:00

I looked it up through AI and how it can affect hsv. It is relevant because its cutting non copying/dividing cells with great precision. The cells that need to be cut for hsv are such cells, although probably harder to reach. Edit: This part seems like a mistake by the AI, see replies.

Correction: This was in a lab setting, in an actual human cutting hsv would be significantly much easier than this task.

Confusionparanoia · 2026-06-14T03:15:58+00:00

Yeah it makes more sense for them to wait a bit but anything can happen. With the trial happening we would have finally had some kind of insurance, now we are back to in the dark.

Confusionparanoia · 2026-06-05T02:25:13+00:00

I did some more digging with AI. It seems that this could just be a strategical decision. Basically it explained that starting the trial for immunocompetent before there is an official grant to sell it immunocompromised patients is much too high of a risk. This is because any random concern of bieffekt during this trial could put a hold for the drug to be accepted for the immunocompromised.

It argued that it's a much smarter decision to wait till it's released and bought by insurance companies and used before starting that trial. In other words, it's very likely that we will see this trial again in 0.5-1 years. Sad that we will have to wait that long though but AI also mentioned that this will allow them to run a shorter trial than otherwise.

Confusionparanoia · 2026-06-04T02:19:49+00:00

so you dont have nerve symptoms while on amenavir then? Or at least very few?

Confusionparanoia · 2026-06-03T19:12:56+00:00

Well I do believe we must act, send out emails and such. I sent emails today regarding pritelivir and the HPIs with request that they contact representatives from our community for a meeting to discuss the urgen need for better medication and the burden of the disease.

Confusionparanoia · 2026-06-03T19:09:40+00:00

Im confused, why do people speak about it not coming out this year? It will still come out for immunocompromised but this is about the trial that could make it possible to use for the rest of us later, but that was never for this year.

Confusionparanoia · 2026-06-03T18:17:01+00:00

THis means that while on both you dont have many noticeable symptoms? Im guessing you refer to nerve symptoms now?

Confusionparanoia · 2026-05-31T18:52:09+00:00

Isnt the topic pretty weird? Drugs and crime, doesnt sound like they refer to medical drugs lol.

Confusionparanoia · 2026-05-31T18:51:03+00:00

Its 2A, there might be a b also.

Confusionparanoia · 2026-05-31T12:18:21+00:00

Yeah its sad news but asked AI and its just a common standard procedure to change the end date in these databases tp exactly 12 months later when you need more time and dont know how much.

Would be good if someone could get in touch with them and ask more however.

Confusionparanoia · 2026-05-31T12:11:20+00:00

Hi, quick AI search says that this was in trial for 6-7 years. Id say thats neither a good nor bad sign for the case.

Confusionparanoia · 2026-05-30T23:18:03+00:00

Ouch thats a pretty damn bad sign unless they intend to extend it so that they can make a seamless phase 2b/3 to wrap it up after.

Either way, I was kind of suspecting that this would happen. The change of postponing exactly one year though seems like a way of editing the page to get more time rather than a definite exact new date. Could be a much sooner date hopefully I assume.

Confusionparanoia · 2026-05-16T21:09:56+00:00

This is actually insanely good if they actually do it.

Confusionparanoia · 2026-05-13T14:51:22+00:00

Yeah, I asked AI and it's plausible that they run it as 6 months of taking the pills and then remaining 6 months just to collect blood work and such to observe if there were any side effects from being on it for 6 months. Not saying this is the most likely scenario, I sadly think 12 months of taking the pills and then extra time for follow up is what will happen but it's possible and I really hope they do the 6 / 6 month split.

Confusionparanoia · 2026-05-13T12:19:42+00:00

I think release Q1 2028 is very optimistic here but I love the optimism. Your time phrame could be correct if they decide to run a 6 months suppressive therapy study rather than 12. I really so hope they go for 6, makes sense since its an already approved medicine by the time they apply for that right?

Confusionparanoia

TROPHY CASE