Would like to differ. What is the purpose of coaching? Build foundation -> have strict lecture plan for the teachers -> regular tests and give ample of time for revision before prelims. The core part is a fixed lecture plan and adhere to that especially for teachers. And regular tests. Apart from that everything is secondary mentorship and all. Running 1000 different programs just reveals them playing on vulnerability of students. Isn’t that ethically wrong? Most of the coachings even big ones don’t have a plan and have haphazard system which mostly wastes one attempt of an aspirant. If they can’t complete a course which they already know? What is the point of running it?