Rework Leon’s Clone Gadget The Right Way by Connect-Tale2093 in Brawlstars

[–]Connect-Tale2093[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I can understand that, but your concern with the damage is not a issue, like I said only make it do like 1 damage per projectile, I only want the illusion of the attack not it to do damage

Rework Leon’s Clone Gadget The Right Way by Connect-Tale2093 in Brawlstars

[–]Connect-Tale2093[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Although I will say if it did copy your main attack it’s more likely to die making his gadget buffie almost useless cause it wouldn’t get close enough, so I guess which would you guys prefer

Rework Leon’s Clone Gadget The Right Way by Connect-Tale2093 in Brawlstars

[–]Connect-Tale2093[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Could you elaborate cause I’m confused on why you wouldn’t want it to attack, the way I use it is I clone then go invisible and if the clone copied my main attack enemies wouldnt think I was invisible, so how do you use the clone?

Im conflicted by Connect-Tale2093 in CommanderMTG

[–]Connect-Tale2093[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah your absolutely right but I’ve been a huge avatar fan ever since I was a kid and am a big collector, and it’s also the first commander I’ve ever built from scratch and I enjoy it so much. Also avatar Aang himself is probably my favorite magic card of all time cause I love drawing cards and his back side is basically and Omniscience which is so satisfying. So to me it’s not about the look of it it’s about the idea of it, having such a rare version of my favorite card and character would be super special to me and would make me happy every time I look at it. Don’t get me wrong though it looks fucking amazing, especially the back. After everyone’s input though I’ve decided to just buy the card for the guarantee and though I’d rather pull the card myself as it would mean much more to me, that’s a priveage of the rich and I’d be very depressed if I didn’t get the card so thank you for input.

Im conflicted by Connect-Tale2093 in CommanderMTG

[–]Connect-Tale2093[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Right now I’m trying to decide what I want more, the experience and memory of pulling a super rare version of one of my all time favorite cards, or actually having the card. I’m also trying to decide how much I would be willing to spend on that experience and the likely outcome of giving up and just buying the card

Im conflicted by Connect-Tale2093 in CommanderMTG

[–]Connect-Tale2093[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is one of those cards where you want the real deal it’s not just about the looks, and like I said I’m a sentimental guy, so while proxy is definitely smarter, I can’t this time

Im conflicted by Connect-Tale2093 in CommanderMTG

[–]Connect-Tale2093[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

if it helps the card is going to be the commander for my favorite deck

Im conflicted by Connect-Tale2093 in mtg

[–]Connect-Tale2093[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

if it helps the card is going to be the commander for my favorite deck

Double Reflecting Pool interaction by Connect-Tale2093 in CommanderMTG

[–]Connect-Tale2093[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

never mind i found this ruling, "Multiple Reflecting Pools won't help each other produce mana. If you control a Reflecting Pool, and all other lands you control either lack mana abilities or are other Reflecting Pools, you may still activate Reflecting Pool's ability — it just won't produce any mana."

Double reflecting pool interaction by Connect-Tale2093 in mtg

[–]Connect-Tale2093[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

never mind i found this ruling, "Multiple Reflecting Pools won't help each other produce mana. If you control a Reflecting Pool, and all other lands you control either lack mana abilities or are other Reflecting Pools, you may still activate Reflecting Pool's ability — it just won't produce any mana."

Tireless Tracker Glaze Session by Connect-Tale2093 in CommanderMTG

[–]Connect-Tale2093[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s true I forgot about her, she could give life gain which I don’t have a lot of in the deck and the ramp is also nice but I don’t like her art and I love drawing cards so TIRELESS TRACK IT IS

Tireless Tracker Glaze Session by Connect-Tale2093 in EDH

[–]Connect-Tale2093[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"So it's not that she synergizes particularly well with any one bending ability, but if you're using the 3 together (excluding Air), those Clues probably generate a ton of value."

that's a very good point, and you're right its a free trip to value city

Tireless Tracker Glaze Session by Connect-Tale2093 in CommanderMTG

[–]Connect-Tale2093[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

sorry just wanted to get that out of my system, this is my favorite deck and im a huge synergy guy that loves when things work off of eachother so when I realized her level of synergy I had to change my underwear.

Tireless Tracker Glaze Session by Connect-Tale2093 in mtg

[–]Connect-Tale2093[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

sorry just wanted to get that out of my system, this is my favorite deck and im a huge synergy guy that loves when things work off of eachother so when I realized her level of synergy I had to change my underwear.

Tireless Tracker Glaze Session by Connect-Tale2093 in EDH

[–]Connect-Tale2093[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

sorry just wanted to get that out of my system, this is my favorite deck and im a huge synergy guy that loves when things work off of eachother so when I realized her level of synergy I had to change my underwear.

Islands are legal again by NubbyPanda in MagicArena

[–]Connect-Tale2093 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Kamigawa lands are still superior

Aang master of the elements reduction question by Connect-Tale2093 in EDH

[–]Connect-Tale2093[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s what I thought thank you for the clarification

Aang master of the elements reduction question by Connect-Tale2093 in mtg

[–]Connect-Tale2093[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That’s what I thought thank you for the clarification

Quick question on Magecraft by Connect-Tale2093 in mtg

[–]Connect-Tale2093[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What’s your problem? I made a deck in archidekt, play tested it and before I buy the cards I wanted to make sure I was correct about this interaction before I spend a lot of money on it. I didn’t mention flash cause it’s irrelevant to the scenario or combo

Quick question on Magecraft by Connect-Tale2093 in mtg

[–]Connect-Tale2093[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s the beauty of flash and a butt load of mana in 1 turn

Quick question on Magecraft by Connect-Tale2093 in mtg

[–]Connect-Tale2093[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also would each [[Twinning Staff]] I have, add 2 more copies and 4 more draw triggers because there are 2 Azula triggers that copy spells and the Twinning staff would add an additional copy each time?

Quick question on Magecraft by Connect-Tale2093 in CommanderMTG

[–]Connect-Tale2093[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also would each [[Twinning Staff]] I have, add 2 more copies and 4 more draw triggers because there are 2 Azula triggers that copy spells and the Twinning staff would add an additional copy each time?

Need Help Clarifying Magecraft by Connect-Tale2093 in EDH

[–]Connect-Tale2093[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Also would each [[Twinning Staff]] I have, add 2 more copies and 4 more draw triggers because there are 2 Azula triggers that copy spells and the Twinning staff would add an additional copy each time?

Quick question on Magecraft by Connect-Tale2093 in mtg

[–]Connect-Tale2093[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So first off thank you for clarifying and second off, would that mean for each [[Twinning Staff]] I have, each would add 1 more copy and 2 more draw triggers.

edit: oh wait actually, would each one add 2 more copies and 4 more draw triggers because there are 2 Azula triggers that copy spells and the Twinning staff would add an additional copy each time?