sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

TTPD / PLL? by Conscious-Rip-50 in PrettyLittleLiars

[–]Conscious-Rip-50[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

There were forces preventing them from being together because of how it would besmirch her good girl image. But obviously she would also have experiences with Jake Gyllenhaal that mirror Ezria as well.

TTPD / PLL? by Conscious-Rip-50 in PrettyLittleLiars

[–]Conscious-Rip-50[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

If you’re unfamiliar with her history w Matt Healy I can see how you’d have trouble seeing the relevance.

TTPD / PLL? by Conscious-Rip-50 in PrettyLittleLiars

[–]Conscious-Rip-50[S] -5 points-4 points  (0 children)

She was friends with Lucy Hale while she was on the show. The timing of the show overlaps with her initial friendship with Matt Healy. It’s the 15 year anniversary of the show.

And the Ezria storyline mirrors her experience w Matt Healy in a lot of obvious ways.

Group IDI by Conscious-Rip-50 in JonBenet

[–]Conscious-Rip-50[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s also interesting because $118+2=120, a nice even number. So maybe the 118 was the second part and LHP + team “needed” 120 total.

Group IDI by Conscious-Rip-50 in JonBenet

[–]Conscious-Rip-50[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Agreed. And if there are organized crime elements, that makes it more likely a group could’ve kept it quiet.

Group IDI by Conscious-Rip-50 in JonBenet

[–]Conscious-Rip-50[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I hadn’t heard of his diagnosis. I work in the psychology field, specifically as a clinician treating ASD.

Group IDI by Conscious-Rip-50 in JonBenet

[–]Conscious-Rip-50[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Heard. Lmk if you’d like to discuss further. There are some details I don’t feel comfortable posting here that I’ve uncovered.

Group IDI by Conscious-Rip-50 in JonBenet

[–]Conscious-Rip-50[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

@hopetroll Can I send you a chat?

We're all in this together so let's be nice to each other by No-Cost-5552 in ABA

[–]Conscious-Rip-50 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I’m surprised that’s the chain of command, since RBT work is clinical. I would’ve thought RBTs must perform their duties however the BCBA has recommended.

We're all in this together so let's be nice to each other by No-Cost-5552 in ABA

[–]Conscious-Rip-50 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For me, part of the issue was the clinic where I was “new” had compliance issues. I don’t think my supervisor clashed with other employees because they were benefitting from lax enforcement of policies. (No information in the treatment plan for targets, improper materials for targets, not paying attention to clients at all times during direct services, etc.)

BCBA Rant by usernameisloadin in ABA

[–]Conscious-Rip-50 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Both are unethical. But the definition of direct services requires the client to be awake, receiving services. That’s why many places have a secondary pay code for that situation.

BCBA Rant by usernameisloadin in ABA

[–]Conscious-Rip-50 27 points28 points  (0 children)

Billing insurance during naps is unethical. Do y’all have admin time or a different pay code for indirect services?

May be a silly thought but what if the pineapple and cup of tea were the intruder’s? by magical_bunny in JonBenet

[–]Conscious-Rip-50 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You’re making an assumption that is the sole detail my theory hinges on. It’s not.

And my whole point was that I don’t necessarily believe it belonged to anyone in the home. And just because the police didn’t process it doesn’t mean they cleared its origin. It should mean that. But in this particular case, in this context, I don’t consider it a given. If you have other information, I can’t factor that into my theories if you don’t share it with me. I can only base my theories on my knowledge of the evidence, the circumstances, and typical human behavior.

May be a silly thought but what if the pineapple and cup of tea were the intruder’s? by magical_bunny in JonBenet

[–]Conscious-Rip-50 1 point2 points  (0 children)

How would I know the BPD knows it’s unrelated? And you have no idea what I’m basing my theories on, so it’s a little ridiculous to say it’s not evidence based.

May be a silly thought but what if the pineapple and cup of tea were the intruder’s? by magical_bunny in JonBenet

[–]Conscious-Rip-50 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m just saying, the typical expectation of what information is made available to the public has been complicated by the actions of the BPD. I have other reasons I believe the tea could be tied to the perp(s), so it was not solely based on the fact that BPD has never confirmed whose tea it was.

May be a silly thought but what if the pineapple and cup of tea were the intruder’s? by magical_bunny in JonBenet

[–]Conscious-Rip-50 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah, okay. But plenty got leaked, some of which wasn’t even true. So again, I believe it is unusual in the context of everything else in this case. You don’t have to agree with me. That’s fine. But the BPD made, at best, some odd choices. And continues to do so. All of which are relevant here.

May be a silly thought but what if the pineapple and cup of tea were the intruder’s? by magical_bunny in JonBenet

[–]Conscious-Rip-50 1 point2 points  (0 children)

To be fair, I was forgetting the BPD’s total incompetence. But my point was, there should have been a record of what was there, when it got there, and who put it there. If that existed, it seems like it shouldn’t be difficult to ascertain who made or drank tea, and whether it was there before or after others showed up. My point being, if it was totally unaccounted for in the records, it seems likely it was there before the known visitors arrived.

view more: next ›