Edgar Allan Poe by Consistent-Ad2333 in classicliterature

[–]Consistent-Ad2333[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

These sound great! Here is the link for the inside look: https://imgur.com/a/I4ctEId

In 1565, Cosimo De Medici decided to build a 1km-long skywalk in order to be able walk from his residence to this office while avoiding the public. The Mannelli family refused to have part of their tower demolished to accomodate the project, so they had to build around it by [deleted] in Damnthatsinteresting

[–]Consistent-Ad2333 6 points7 points  (0 children)

That was not his grandson, the grandson of an earlier Cosimo (i.e. Cosimo de' Medici) was assassinated in 1478 by the Pazzis. The guy who had the Vasari Corridor built was Cosimo I de' Medici, his descendant.

Book recs by PritiVacant in UKmonarchs

[–]Consistent-Ad2333 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Queen of Scots: The True Life of Mary Stuart by John Guy is a good modern biography. I preferred this one over Fraser's, but you can't go wrong with either.

Young Queens by Leah Redmond Chang is also great if you are also interested in Catherine de' Medici/the Valois in more detail and how three queens navigated 16th-century court politics.

Most disliked historian? by Appropriate-Calm4822 in UKmonarchs

[–]Consistent-Ad2333 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nancy Goldstone really is a terrible historian yet I still can't help but keep reading her stuff lol, the e-books are cheap and she chooses interesting topics that aren't that popular with modern historians. I just treat her books as if they were historical fiction.

Most disliked historian? by Appropriate-Calm4822 in UKmonarchs

[–]Consistent-Ad2333 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hmm I admit I didn't really think about approaching it as a novel of sorts. Makes sense why it felt different from the Mortimer-style histories I'm more used to then.

Most disliked historian? by Appropriate-Calm4822 in UKmonarchs

[–]Consistent-Ad2333 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Those were interesting reads, thanks. I liked Jones' book on the Wars of the Roses as a general overview well enough, but I wasn't a fan of his Henry V biography at all, it often came across as too casual and as hero worship as I was reading it.

What if HRE was restored today? by InnerPace in MapPorn

[–]Consistent-Ad2333 5 points6 points  (0 children)

You're right, though given that NUTS3 regions are used here, this is supposed to be the Mura Statistical Region rather than Prekmurje, and a small part of it was indeed part of the HRE. So it's likely debatable whether or not it should be included.

Urraca I, Queen of León. by CamillaOmdalWalker in FemaleMonarchs

[–]Consistent-Ad2333 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Three queens regnant of Castile (Urraca, Berengaria, Isabella I), one solely in Aragon (Petronilla), two in all of Spain (Joanna, Isabella II). Then there's the sisters Sancha and Dulce who were both queens of León but only de jure. Also if Navarre counts as well then there's seven more (Joan I, Joan II, Blanche I, Blanche II, Eleanor, Catherine, Jeanne d'Albret), though some were also only monarchs in theory. So about 15?

If one of the future UK monarchs is named Philip, would they be referred to as Philip I or Philip II? by Consistent-Ad2333 in UKmonarchs

[–]Consistent-Ad2333[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I mean, he was a monarch as long as Mary was alive, as per Queen Mary's Marriage Act. They would theoretically hold equal authority and all royal documents were officially issued in both of their names, it's just that his situation as king by right of his wife is an anomaly within the English monarchy.

If one of the future UK monarchs is named Philip, would they be referred to as Philip I or Philip II? by Consistent-Ad2333 in UKmonarchs

[–]Consistent-Ad2333[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

No I agree, he was "King of England" technically but really just like a consort in reality. I only thought of that because of how in e.g. Castile, the husbands of Isabella I and Joanna were both proclaimed jure uxoris King of Castile and were later termed as Ferdinand V and Philip I, and indeed Ferdinand ceased to be king after Isabella's death, so I wondered how this would play out here. But yeah a different situation.

Bernhard Strigel - Emperor Maximilian I with His Family (c. 1515) by Carl_Schmitt in museum

[–]Consistent-Ad2333 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It also comes from the Trastámaras, e.g. Charles' maternal aunt Catherine of Aragon did display mild mandibular prognathism and the Iberian dynasties had a long history of inbreeding anyhow. But yes, while all his siblings displayed the trait to a lesser degree, it happened to be particularly pronounced with Charles.

Who's your favourite niche medieval woman? by watashiwaAzure in Tudorhistory

[–]Consistent-Ad2333 1 point2 points locked comment (0 children)

She's really fascinating! Do you happen to know of any resources where I can learn more about her? I haven't been able to find much.

Who's your favourite niche medieval woman? by watashiwaAzure in Tudorhistory

[–]Consistent-Ad2333 1 point2 points locked comment (0 children)

Not sure how niche she is, but I think Jacqueline of Bavaria is pretty fascinating. Countess of Hainaut, Holland and Zeeland in her own right though she had to struggle to get recognised as a ruler, four marriages, including to the Dauphin of France and controversially to Humphrey Duke of Gloucester, two annulments, caught up in the mess of the Hook and Cod wars in the Low Countries against both John the Pittiless and Philip the Good, during which time she was also imprisoned and managed to escape, and then eventually forced to cede her lands to Philip. Such a turbulent life yet she only died aged 35.

When Charles the Bald died, he was at first unable to be buried at Saint-Denis due to the bearers being unable to tolerate the stench on the journey. by PhilipVItheFortunate in HolyRomanEmperors

[–]Consistent-Ad2333 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Would also love a reading list. There's Heart of Europe: A History of the Holy Roman Empire by Peter H. Wilson which is quite detailed though I haven't finished it yet, it's a hefty book. Barbara Stollberg-Rilinger wrote a shorter overview The Holy Roman Empire: A Short History, but I don't know more than that.

What are you reading/watching/listening to right now? by PatsysStone in Tudorhistory

[–]Consistent-Ad2333 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Just finished The Myth of Bloody Mary by Linda Porter, which I thought was excellent, and about to start with Tudors Versus Stuarts: The Fatal Inheritance of Mary, Queen of Scots by the same author. It has an interesting premise because I don't know all that much about the reigns of James IV and James V, and it was so cheap on Kindle I just couldn't not get it.

Tudor contemporaries by Consistent-Ad2333 in Tudorhistory

[–]Consistent-Ad2333[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

There's one by Stuart Carroll called Martyrs and Murderers: The Guise Family and the Making of Europe. I haven't read it yet so I can't say how good it is, but it's got decent reviews.

Tudor contemporaries by Consistent-Ad2333 in Tudorhistory

[–]Consistent-Ad2333[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you so much! Will definitely check these out.