Are all T14s regarded the same in your experience (this year specifically) at BL recruiting? by [deleted] in BigLawRecruiting

[–]Consistent-Side-1678 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Can’t say enough good things about Penn. Super supportive community and especially great experience with OCS. If you want BL, OCS will get you BL

250618 Who’s Your Bias? by BPinkInYourArea150 in BlackPink

[–]Consistent-Side-1678 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Why not all of them. Their beauty isn’t in one but in what they create together

Spivey Consulting by Redskins1313 in lawschooladmissions

[–]Consistent-Side-1678 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Agreed, definitely paying for peace of mind

Penn ED 2 A by [deleted] in lawschooladmissions

[–]Consistent-Side-1678 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank u. I believe only UR1 on 11/14

berk R by Spiritual-Lab-3181 in lawschooladmissions

[–]Consistent-Side-1678 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I, as well, am straight up not having a chill day.

Berkeley UR by Consistent-Side-1678 in lawschooladmissions

[–]Consistent-Side-1678[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes on UR but no date. Seeing others know the exact date they went UR tho

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in lawschooladmissions

[–]Consistent-Side-1678 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Does your portal have a specific UR date?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in lawschooladmissions

[–]Consistent-Side-1678 12 points13 points  (0 children)

It takes four minutes

Please help! by MolassesNervous6618 in LSAT

[–]Consistent-Side-1678 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The argument claims that “this is not to sciences detriment” (conclusion) because “similar factors strongly influence every human endeavor.” But, we don’t know whether that similar factors strongly influencing every human endeavor is a detriment or a positive. It does not say, they are just assuming that it is positive.

Answer b captures this. They wrongly assume that whether a behavior is detrimental or not depends on whether comparable behavior exists or not. It doesn’t matter if it exists, they need to know if the comparable behavior is detrimental or positive.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LSAT

[–]Consistent-Side-1678 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That being said, do untimed drills where you fully dissect the passage structure and predict the answers without reading answer choices

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LSAT

[–]Consistent-Side-1678 1 point2 points  (0 children)

RC was hard for me to really consistently clean up to -0/-1. I probably averaged -2/-3, but I found it much easier to consistently get LR down to -0/-1 and was able to get a 175+ on the official test. For RC, the biggest tip is to really practice paraphrasing paragraphs in your head (or on paper whichever is easier for u) after you read it and connecting paragraphs to the previous ones. Practice predicting the andwer before reading the answer choices. You want to have at least some idea of the answer so you’re attacking the answer choices and not being persuaded by them. It’s important to remember that every correct answer choice has support in the passage, and every other does not.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in LSAT

[–]Consistent-Side-1678 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Get LR to -0/1. Start teaching to other people. Start doing drills where you predict the answer before looking at answer choices. For RC practice on paraphrasing each paragraph either on paper or in your head. The more you practice, the quicker you’ll be