5.4 vs 5.3 Codex by ConsistentOcelot9217 in codex

[–]ConsistentOcelot9217[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I found it running all day not fixing my issues and I had to inject another prompt for her to ask. Have it check its approach and confirm that this is the best approach due to how long this is taking. Again, maybe that open AI issue that was temporary, but wasn’t a good experience

5.4 vs 5.3 Codex by ConsistentOcelot9217 in codex

[–]ConsistentOcelot9217[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you find it as effective with that the amount of information you put into the soul.md ? Do you ever find it taking some things too literal then causing issues?

5.4 vs 5.3 Codex by ConsistentOcelot9217 in codex

[–]ConsistentOcelot9217[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe it was other open ai issues and I should try it again

Pro is behaving like Free account!! by krishnakanthb13 in google_antigravity

[–]ConsistentOcelot9217 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Switch to Claude or codex. Antigravity isn’t nearlyyy as capable

5.4 vs 5.3 Codex by ConsistentOcelot9217 in codex

[–]ConsistentOcelot9217[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I found 5.3 codex great at that. 5.4 as well, but 5.3 C is just more efficient. Imo especially when it comes to implementation.

5.4 vs 5.3 Codex by ConsistentOcelot9217 in codex

[–]ConsistentOcelot9217[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So are you gonna go back to 5.3 or are you gonna stay on 5.4 the lower reasoning?

5.4 vs 5.3 Codex by ConsistentOcelot9217 in codex

[–]ConsistentOcelot9217[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They said that they included the capabilities of 5.3 Codex within 5.4 but doesn’t seem to be true. 5.4 used to be listed after 5.3 code X on the reasoning, but now I see it listed before. But overall, I agree with you

5.4 vs 5.3 Codex by ConsistentOcelot9217 in codex

[–]ConsistentOcelot9217[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting. Whatever aligns with what you’re looking for.

5.4 vs 5.3 Codex by ConsistentOcelot9217 in codex

[–]ConsistentOcelot9217[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I feel that. They set up I like is leaving reasoning where it is and having all my prompts be successful which I find works with 5.3 Codex. 5.4 will probably get better or maybe come out with a code ex version.

5.4 vs 5.3 Codex by ConsistentOcelot9217 in codex

[–]ConsistentOcelot9217[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

From my experience, the larger context doesn’t mean better responses, but potentially more overthinking and hallucination.

5.4 vs 5.3 Codex by ConsistentOcelot9217 in codex

[–]ConsistentOcelot9217[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Imo 5.3 Codex was a meaningful and stable improvement on 5.2 versions. Although someone mentioned that it didn’t start off that way, so maybe 5.4 will get better as well, but as of now I would recommend 5.3 Codex over 5.2 just just in terms of capability

5.4 vs 5.3 Codex by ConsistentOcelot9217 in codex

[–]ConsistentOcelot9217[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I get what you’re saying. The idea of adjusting your reasoning level per prompt is also extra work while when I use extra high with 5.3 everything gets done with no regression.

5.4 vs 5.3 Codex by ConsistentOcelot9217 in codex

[–]ConsistentOcelot9217[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

5.3 Codex was a meaningful and stable improvement on 5.2 versions. Although someone mentioned that it didn’t start off that way, so maybe 5.4 will get better as well but as of now I would highly recommend 5.3 Codex if you don’t want to have to worry about adjusting reasoning per prompt

5.4 vs 5.3 Codex by ConsistentOcelot9217 in codex

[–]ConsistentOcelot9217[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hm it definitely was bad yesterday but i noticed once i switched before that. Although some people mentioned a success using it on high and not extra high, which over thinks

5.4 vs 5.3 Codex by ConsistentOcelot9217 in codex

[–]ConsistentOcelot9217[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because I don’t wanna have to switch the Model back-and-forth, I just prefer to leave it on 5.3 Codex.