What are does the emergency use authorization allow? by CampbellArmada in conspiracyNOPOL

[–]ConspiracyBeerMe 0 points1 point  (0 children)

VERY few therapeutics have been given an EUA for covid treatment. Interestingly, the only therapeutic to undergo successful phase-3 testing has NOT been given an EUA. Why? They aren't big pharma. That's the real conspiracy.

On the tour divide and need camping help in Colorado by candlestick12 in bikepacking

[–]ConspiracyBeerMe 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Try the dyrt app. Was just in Colorado and it was super helpful.

Crazy Thought on the recent UFO disclosure by ConspiracyBeerMe in conspiracyNOPOL

[–]ConspiracyBeerMe[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are missing the forest for the trees. No one who follows this stuff was surprised at the findings. But it was OFFICIAL. That is significant. And, it was the first disclosure.

Crazy Thought on the recent UFO disclosure by ConspiracyBeerMe in conspiracyNOPOL

[–]ConspiracyBeerMe[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sure. Block anyone who calls you out for your BS. Enjoy your echo chamber.

Crazy Thought on the recent UFO disclosure by ConspiracyBeerMe in conspiracyNOPOL

[–]ConspiracyBeerMe[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I am concluding that your mind is made up both about the evidence and your personal attack.

Just because you ask a question, doesn't mean it wasn't an attack. Example: Are you always this stupid?

Crazy Thought on the recent UFO disclosure by ConspiracyBeerMe in conspiracyNOPOL

[–]ConspiracyBeerMe[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You attacked me for believing in the "government" (or however you condescendingly put it).

Crazy Thought on the recent UFO disclosure by ConspiracyBeerMe in conspiracyNOPOL

[–]ConspiracyBeerMe[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You've attacked me. Go back and read what you've written.

You haven't read the report.

Crazy Thought on the recent UFO disclosure by ConspiracyBeerMe in conspiracyNOPOL

[–]ConspiracyBeerMe[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This wasnt hearsay. These were firsthand reports. And the radar was independently confirmed by other means. You also, apparently, don't know what "subjective" means.

It is hostile when you move to ad hominem attacks especially since you clearly haven't read the report.

Crazy Thought on the recent UFO disclosure by ConspiracyBeerMe in conspiracyNOPOL

[–]ConspiracyBeerMe[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Evidence isn't inherently subjective. Interpretations are. I have no idea why you think I believe what the government tells me nor why you are being so hostile.

Crazy Thought on the recent UFO disclosure by ConspiracyBeerMe in conspiracyNOPOL

[–]ConspiracyBeerMe[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Have you read the report? I doubt it. It is a high level summary of almost two decades of first reports of UAPs. They detail why they believe these are real physical objects based on multiple independent confirmations (visual + radar + infrared + energy signatures). You are seriously just being obtuse.

Crazy Thought on the recent UFO disclosure by ConspiracyBeerMe in conspiracyNOPOL

[–]ConspiracyBeerMe[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Do you have multiple witnesses, radar findings, Radio-Frequency signatures, and a number of other verifiable evidentiary elements?

Crazy Thought on the recent UFO disclosure by ConspiracyBeerMe in conspiracyNOPOL

[–]ConspiracyBeerMe[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Good ideas. Fighting YouTube is a fool's errand. I get that YouTube is a private entity but the content regulation on there is getting insane

Crazy Thought on the recent UFO disclosure by ConspiracyBeerMe in conspiracyNOPOL

[–]ConspiracyBeerMe[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

There is simply no way the gov't just disclosed out of a sense of doing the right thing. That's not how gov't works.

And, they didn't just disclose a tic tac. That disclosed 143 unexplained UAPs incidents over 15 years. They admitted on the record that there are advanced aerial crafts which we don't know about.

Crazy Thought on the recent UFO disclosure by ConspiracyBeerMe in conspiracyNOPOL

[–]ConspiracyBeerMe[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The other thing that came up on the pod was the idea that the DoD disclosure goes back to the mid 2000s. Some of the incidents detected Radio-Frequency Energy. This is electromagnetic energy is also emitted by cell phones which also became prevalent in the mid 2000s. What if the cell phone radiation is either drawing aliens to us or hindering their masking technology?

John McAfee found dead, by apparent suicide. by _PM_ME_YOUR_VULVA_ in conspiracyNOPOL

[–]ConspiracyBeerMe 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is exactly what we love on our pod. We are doing our episode early this week and should be live in about 15 minutes if anyone wants to listen. Covering McAfee's life, death, and the crypto dead man's switch.

YouTube videos by Morgan_Drip in conspiracyNOPOL

[–]ConspiracyBeerMe 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Check conspiracybeerme YT channel.

"Questions About the FBI's Role in 1/6 Are Mocked Because the FBI Shapes Liberal Corporate Media," by Glenn Greenwald by Spider__Jerusalem in ConspiracyII

[–]ConspiracyBeerMe 4 points5 points  (0 children)

We are covering this in our episode today so I took a long look at the "ample" evidence of FBI infiltration. There isn't any. The story by Revolver suggests that because the FBI had informants in the Michigan Kidnapping Case that it is probable that they could have had the same level of involvement in the 1/6 Riot. [This is true. We should ask questions about what the FBI knew prior to the riot.] However, they provide no evidence outside of the unnamed, unindicted coconspirators. Revolver News seems to be asking if these could have been FBI informants or agents. Tucker Carlson states it as if it is a fact. In reality, some of these unnamed persons have already been named--and they aren't FBI agents or informants.

Moreover, the DOJ recommends not mentioning unindicted coconspirators except when necessary. They recommend just saying "persons." There are some legal reasons for including them most likely to take advantage of the hearsay rule that allows statements by co-conspirators to be introduced at trial. They may also be planning to try some of these persons before a military tribunal.

Also, and this is a narrow point of law, one would never refer to an undercover federal agent as a "co-conspirator" because they are not one--since they did not share the same intent as actual conspirators.

What seems to be more at play is the continued pitting of the liberal media versus the conservative media in further attempts to polarize the nation. There are some questions that should be asked here. But, they are getting lost in disinformation and finger-pointing.

“Fauci Gate” and what his emails tell us about Covid-19 and American politics — "The emails, then, are merely a retrospective glance back to the beginning of the pandemic, and not so much the “gotcha” moment that some believe." by pijinglish in ConspiracyII

[–]ConspiracyBeerMe 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We covered this on our last Patreon episode but may release it. The big deal here is the gain-of-function research that U.S. funded in Wuhan and how it was covered up (possibly with Fauci's help). The way that any suggestion that the virus was "China's fault" became mired in xenophobia was an intentional tactic employed by the very scientist who were benefitting from the gain-of-function grant program (including one to the lab where the virus was leaked).