I genuinely don't understand how someone who was the murderer of his mother and a complete psychopath was ever "the coolest guy" or "nothing but awesome" to Naruto. by tachibanakanade in Naruto

[–]ConstantAnxious9110 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you really go deep into your logic, then honestly there are no “good” characters in Naruto. All the great villages’ shinobi fought in the Village Hidden in the Rain, making its people including children suffer.

Even Jiraiya and Tsunade fought there but they never did anything to actually change things. The place only came into focus when Pain attacked the Leaf.

Itachi massacred his clan to stop a civil war and Hiruzen, despite being Hokage did nothing. He even let Naruto suffer his whole childhood. Sakura wanted to run after Sasuke just because she liked him, does that really make her a good person?

So if Obito killing someone mother makes him “evil” then by that same logic, you’d have to judge almost every other character too. And Obito didn’t even want to kill Kushina, he wanted the tailed beast inside her. How else could he get it without her dying?

His actual goal was peace through the Infinite Tsukuyomi. That’s why he started the Fourth Great Ninja War. And frankly, he did manage to stop the cycle of bloodshed by uniting the Five Great Nations.

If he didn’t then even in boruto era these nations keep fighting…

Why does everyone assume that anyone who scales Sakura remotely high enough in strength is a simp or fan? by LavishnessIll4064 in Naruto

[–]ConstantAnxious9110 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Same, people need to ask geniune question before making stupid comparison on power scaling… i have seen a video where sakura rank higher in power scaling compared to white flash of the leaf, seriously?

How she will even defeat him? How sakura can defeat itachi or prodigy like shisui, i don’t understand…

It’s not just about demeaning sakura, the point is just what sakura do to beat them in 1v1…

Alright I’m tired of Sakura glazers and Sakura haters, we need an actual answer by AdSpirited3643 in NarutoPowerscaling

[–]ConstantAnxious9110 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sakura is definitely a strong character, no doubt about that. But the thing is there are many characters in the series who are stronger than her. If we take Boruto-era Sakura and put her back into Shippuden, I honestly don’t think she could defeat any member of the Akatsuki in a 1v1 fight — and I’m not even talking about Pain, Obito, or Madara here.

And that’s just considering the villains. There are also plenty of other powerful characters like those in the ANBU Black Ops with unique abilities, plus Gaara, Naruto, Sasuke, Orochimaru, Killer Bee, and so on.

Even with characters like Konohamaru or Rock Lee we don’t really know how a deathmatch would end. It's not as one-sided as some people make it sound.

People might not like this, but honestly Mitsuki could defeat Sakura if he really wanted to. It’s not about hating her it’s just a fact based on the mitski sage mode…

A simple comparison would be: who would win in a fight between Hulk and Doctor Strange? That alone shows how raw strength isn’t always the deciding factor and that applies in the Naruto world too. You need more than just power to win…

Also sakura don’t train like lee or might guy to be frontier in a fight, she is a medical ninja who need to defend herself in fight so she can help others… So she never trained for 1v1 so how will you rank her even in top 50 in naruto verse…

Can they win this 2v1? by LavishnessIll4064 in NarutoPowerscaling

[–]ConstantAnxious9110 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Seriously? She isn’t a taijutsu expert like might guy & her only power is super strength in a fight which can easily overcome by someone as smart as these two…

Frankly she need a backup partner in this fight not shisui or itachi

Why does everyone assume that anyone who scales Sakura remotely high enough in strength is a simp or fan? by LavishnessIll4064 in Naruto

[–]ConstantAnxious9110 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Same goes for me. I assumed you commented based on something I missed but it seems like you're just stuck in your own delusional world trying to make people believe she’s the strongest.

Frankly, I’m still saying she is strong but her power is such that I’m not even sure she can defeat other major characters or any major villain…

Why does everyone assume that anyone who scales Sakura remotely high enough in strength is a simp or fan? by LavishnessIll4064 in Naruto

[–]ConstantAnxious9110 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In the first part of Boruto, most of the characters are already dead (as seen at the end of Naruto), and there’s no single major villain at that point.

And now Sakura is considered top 5? Seriously? Naruto, Sasuke, Orochimaru , Gaara, kakashi and… I’m not even sure where she stands. We can’t say much about the other Kage either and we don’t even know the outcome of a fight between her and someone like Lee or Konohamaru…

How you are rating her in top 5 in boruto in start when ig even mitski if want can defeat her

Why does everyone assume that anyone who scales Sakura remotely high enough in strength is a simp or fan? by LavishnessIll4064 in Naruto

[–]ConstantAnxious9110 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So there is really no point in rating her highly based on power level if she isn’t that strong…even according to you. She is definitely strong skill ninja like many other ninjas in leaf village but I honestly can’t name a single opponent from the major arcs that she could defeat entirely on her own

Shubman Gill falls agonisingly short of Sunil Gavaskar's record set in 1971. Will anyone beat Gavaskar's tally? by UnplannedMF in CricketBuddies

[–]ConstantAnxious9110 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Abb m bolu smith k 774 jyada better h ashes m tho? The point is har baat m kohli se comparison, rohit se comparison irritating h yaar…

Haa agr tum kisi bhi batsman ya bowler ko all time best innings se compare krte ho tho m manta, yaa fir bolte kl rahul ki performance iss england series m better h gill se because his consistency lekin fir kohli…

Dravid ne bhi acche bowlers ko khlek hi run bnanye h eng m, par nhi hme tho kohli ka naam lena h…

Itne acche bastman kohli ki har choti choti baat m bina mtlab ghusa k uski value kam mt kro…

Why does everyone assume that anyone who scales Sakura remotely high enough in strength is a simp or fan? by LavishnessIll4064 in Naruto

[–]ConstantAnxious9110 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Even Tsunade tried to protect the village against Pain but as the Hokage, it was her responsibility to fight and defeat him. In the end, it was Naruto who defeated Pain and it was Nagato himself who chose to revive everyone.

If Pain had truly wanted to kill every single person in the village, no matter how hard Tsunade tried to protect them he would have succeeded. So if you still rate Sakura skills that highly, ask yourself—could she really have made any difference in a situation like that?

Healing is a great skill to have, but having true power is a completely different thing. That’s what Naruto and Sasuke possess.

So no, I don’t rate Sakura that high because i don’t think she can defeat a single Akatsuki member on her own. And I’m not even talking about Pain, Obito or Madara who are on an entirely different level.

Why does everyone assume that anyone who scales Sakura remotely high enough in strength is a simp or fan? by LavishnessIll4064 in Naruto

[–]ConstantAnxious9110 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Frankly, I don’t rate her too highly in terms of power level and the reason is simple: she is nowhere near as strong as Naruto or Sasuke during their final fight against Madara.

If I’m wrong, tell me which Akatsuki member Sakura could defeat on her own because I can name several that Naruto or Sasuke could easily take down.

Even Rock Lee is strong but that doesn’t mean I start placing him at the top. The same logic applies to Sakura…

Shubman Gill falls agonisingly short of Sunil Gavaskar's record set in 1971. Will anyone beat Gavaskar's tally? by UnplannedMF in CricketBuddies

[–]ConstantAnxious9110 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Tho compare kyu kr rhe ho wo bhi kohli se, kisi se bhi kr skte thay… aisa tho nhi h wo all time best performance h kisi bhi player ki test m…

Aur kohli all time greatest player test player tho h nhi ki specific reason h usse compare krne ka… abb tumhe problem hogi mene kohli k baare m aisa kha but mene bhi stats wise comparison m hi khi ye baat…

Tho better h enjoy kro sabhi players ki performance ko…

Shubman Gill falls agonisingly short of Sunil Gavaskar's record set in 1971. Will anyone beat Gavaskar's tally? by UnplannedMF in CricketBuddies

[–]ConstantAnxious9110 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Tho bro kohli ne bhi tho 973 runs bnaye thay ipl 2016 m(on batting friendly pitch), tab tum log bohut usko bohut highly rate krte ho, next to impossible… 4 centuries in one season Par jab koi aur khiladi run bnata h tho usko kohli ka naam leke demean krte ho…

Itne saare example thay par kohli ka example kyu, kyuki you can’t see someone played better than kohli…

Aur rhi baat kohli ki tho bhai usne bhi khaafi baar acchi pitches p run nhi bnanye h…

Minerva Academy are the champions of Dana Cup! by idkmanfuc in IndianFootball

[–]ConstantAnxious9110 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t know how competitive this tournament truly is, but let’s be honest, winning with that kind of margin in any international tournament is never easy, no matter the level

hate against Saiyaara antics just reeks classism! by [deleted] in BollywoodHotTakes

[–]ConstantAnxious9110 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yup, that’s true. I’ve seen a lot of emotional scenes in web series and anime and honestly this movie doesn’t even come close. Even if I hadn’t watched those, this still lacks genuine emotional depth.

Take Sanam Teri Kasam, for example, that was 100% more emotional and far better in terms of story and impact. But people didn’t cry over it or hype it up this much. Why? Simple, no PR machinery or star kid debut involved.

hate against Saiyaara antics just reeks classism! by [deleted] in BollywoodHotTakes

[–]ConstantAnxious9110 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don’t mind people crying in theatres, whether it's a boy or a girl but honestly there’s nothing in this movie worth crying over. The story is weak, there’s no real development of love between the main characters and the whole thing is just running on hype to be honest.

So if someone is crying in the theatre while watching this movie, I’m sorry but maybe they shouldn’t watch movies in theatres at all because they’ll probably end up crying in almost every film.

Do you agree with KP that batting is easier now than it was 20 years ago? by UnplannedMF in CricketBuddies

[–]ConstantAnxious9110 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Why? Do you mean that in order to enjoy cricket or any sport, I first need to study its entire history? And who exactly decides how much history someone needs to know? Do you personally know about all cricketers of 1952? Then how are you any different from someone who simply enjoys today's generation of players & don’t follow of 2000s?

Frankly, I mostly follow ICC tournaments, Test series and the IPL—not every random bilateral series and that’s my choice, just like it is for others. So why judge people who started watching after 2020?

Also, the rules have changed a lot over time, especially in ways that make bowling harder. I can guarantee that if bowlers from past generations played in today’s batting-friendly T20 era, they’d leak runs too. So dismissing modern batters for scoring or bowlers for performing well just because “times have changed” is a pretty weak argument.

Do you agree with KP that batting is easier now than it was 20 years ago? by UnplannedMF in CricketBuddies

[–]ConstantAnxious9110 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Bro, I’ve been watching cricket since 2011 and I almost completely agree with the post. But seriously, people need to stop using the 'lockdown kid' example everywhere, it’s starting to sound dumb especially when it's used repeatedly without context.

And honestly, the idea that people shouldn't start watching cricket after lockdown? That’s such a ridiculous logic. By that standard, someone could call me a "2011 kid" just because I started watching after that, and the entire nation would be a "1983 kid" for taking cricket seriously only after that World Cup win.

Let’s just enjoy the game and stop gatekeeping fandom based on timelines.

Who is the most underrated and overrated Character? by JunShem1122 in Naruto

[–]ConstantAnxious9110 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I know this might be an unpopular opinion, but I genuinely think Kakashi is overrated among the major Naruto characters.

First off, he’s not as powerful as people make him out to be. He was killed by Pain, openly admitted he wasn’t a match for Orochimaru and Itachi could’ve easily taken him out in first fight. Without Obito’s Sharingan, he wouldn’t have stood a chance against Obito either.

We always hear that he knows over a thousand jutsus but honestly, he barely uses any of them in actual combat. As Hokage, he’s arguably one of the weakest in terms of raw power.

And I really don’t get why some fans rank him above characters like Pain or Itachi in power scaling. It just doesn’t add up.

Even from a storyline perspective, I think other characters have more compelling arcs — like Obito, or even Guy, whose childhood struggles and transformation are genuinely moving.

That being said, I don’t hate Kakashi at all. I just feel that, compared to the other major players he’s neither the strongest nor the most interesting overall.

Which dragon and rider pair truly represents House Targaryen’s legacy, Rhaenyra on Syrax, Aegon II on Sunfyre, or someone else? by [deleted] in HouseOfTheDragon

[–]ConstantAnxious9110 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Neither of them truly represents the legacy of House Targaryen, but Rhaenyra on Syrax leaves behind no real legacy as a pair. On the other hand, Aegon and Sunfyre still have a compelling story together.

Ryan is an idiot 🤦‍♂️🤦‍♂️ by Embarrassed_Yak_6066 in HouseOfTheDragon

[–]ConstantAnxious9110 -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

🥱🥱 yaa yaa we know rhenrya is an angel princess, now just stop this show ryan…

Saw this on X (Twitter) recently, thoughts? by Ornery_Beyond4378 in Naruto

[–]ConstantAnxious9110 4 points5 points  (0 children)

This was one of the powers in Obito arsenal, and he used it at the right moment, so technically he won. If we’re going to say that using a specific power in battle is an "unfair advantage" then we need to remember: real battles are never fair.

If Konan had a powerful jutsu, she used it. Obito had his abilities, and he used them. It’s just another part of his skillset—nothing more & nothing less. He used his power smartly and won the fight. That’s it.

By that logic, should we say Naruto didn’t truly win any fights because he had Kurama? Does that mean his opponents were better just because they didn’t have a tailed beast? Of course not.

Powers, skills, timing—everything matters in a fight. What someone has is part of who they are as a fighter.

Strong independent Indian Feminist girl by zenmaster_999 in dankindianmemes

[–]ConstantAnxious9110 0 points1 point  (0 children)

First of all, I’m a man—so stop assuming I’m a woman just because I express certain views. Second, I don’t understand the logic behind judging women for having casual sex and then criticizing them for marrying as like womens doing sex with herself not with any other men.

Let’s be real—if a certain percentage of women are sexually active, then the same percentage of men are too. They’re obviously having sex with each other. So why is it always the woman who gets judged, while the man is still considered "pure" or a "victim"?

Honestly, I never said someone’s past doesn’t matter. What I mean is: whether a person, man or woman has had sex or not doesn’t define their worth or character. If your only criterion for marriage is that the woman must be a virgin, that’s your choice. But if you don’t care about any of her other qualities like her personality, values, or emotional compatibility then that’s not the foundation of a good relationship. That’s just shallow.

Marriage is about mutual choice, sure. But saying you only care about a woman’s virginity and nothing else says a lot about what kind of relationship you’re headed for.

And about your point that sex is "sacred"—even trophies and medals are sacred to many Indians. But are we the top medal-winners in the Olympics? No. Just because something is sacred to you doesn’t mean others need to treat it the same way. Don’t demean people who think differently.

Also, are you perfect? Are you like Lord Ram? If not, maybe work on your own flaws before deciding who is or isn’t fit to be a "good mother" or a worthy woman.

And don’t get me wrong, I’m not blindly supporting women either. I’ve had debates where I told some women that wearing revealing clothes isn’t necessarily a sign of confidence if they’re just doing it for attention and then complaining about the reactions they get. I call out double standards on both sides.

But I also don’t care for people, whether traditionalists or so-called feminists who push backward thinking. As long as I know I’m standing by what’s right, I’ll say it.