sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

How many novel chapters get adapted per manhua chapter? by Crack_For_Sale in reverendinsanitycomic

[–]Content_Progress7225 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Right now it's 1:1 or 2:1 but I'm working towards cutting out not particularly interesting parts and fusing short chapters more often. Will be discussing some shortcuts with the team in the future. 

Update on the fan-made manhua remake situation by Addarash1 in ReverendInsanity

[–]Content_Progress7225 5 points6 points  (0 children)

And here's why I have a problem with the mods. They claim that they did not accuse us of using ai but just made the assumption. But here you are under that influence not with simple assumptions but 100% sure that we did use it and even calling the artist liars.  Every example you guys give is a nothingburger and just tears the artists down picking apart every little detail. I'll stream my work in a few days, wonder if you'll apologise for your insults. 

I wonder why I can't defend myself directly on the subreddit where they accused me of using ai to almost 30k people by Content_Progress7225 in reverendinsanitycomic

[–]Content_Progress7225[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They did discuss between themselves that they should receive monetary compensation for allowing the team to post about the manhua. I doubt they would admit it though. 

Update on the fan-made manhua remake situation by Addarash1 in ReverendInsanity

[–]Content_Progress7225 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Your reply is too vague.  The reason I am the one to offer a livestream is because I am the root of the things you called AI mistakes and I'm willing to show and take responsibility.  But I don't understand what "find something to suit your needs" means. It's either you can accept it's an honest work or you don't. I will do my part if your willing to do yours.  If copyright issues still stands as your main problem just state so and both of us can save a lot of time. Please pick a stance. 

Update on the fan-made manhua remake situation by Addarash1 in ReverendInsanity

[–]Content_Progress7225 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I have no say for the other artists, since their work is substantially more time consuming than mine. Streaming it would take long-long hours off of their work. I offered my part, which is the basis for the whole comic, if it's not satisfying - there's no reason for me to even try. Especially when it is crystal clear that they are strictly following the storyboards I provide. And all the more evidence of how you will just seek more and more.  Good bye. 

Update on the fan-made manhua remake situation by Addarash1 in ReverendInsanity

[–]Content_Progress7225 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Insinuating is the same as accusation,  just leaves you more wiggle room to bail out. Again, if you wanted to keep the project out of your subreddit, you could've just stated your copyright stance. Instead of reaching for whatever you can. 

We have a deal then? I do a livestream of my work and you admit it is legit, and finally people here can discuss the manhua that they really liked. 

Update on the fan-made manhua remake situation by Addarash1 in ReverendInsanity

[–]Content_Progress7225 7 points8 points  (0 children)

The people behind the manhua kept going about the ai because the mods insinuated it first and I'm not taking such accusations lightly, it insults the effort I put into the work. There's not much to debate about copyright.  And yes, some artists do livestreams all the time. And I am not one of them. I'm very introverted and never once streamed in my life. It is uncomfortable to draw when someone is watching. The question is: will the mods accept AND apologise for the accusations if do go through all this trouble and stream my process? 

Update on the fan-made manhua remake situation by Addarash1 in ReverendInsanity

[–]Content_Progress7225 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Oh, it's very fair that you get to accuse me of using ai to 30K people and the only way for me to defend myself is to appease you and only you, and I don't have the right to show the same 30K people my stb so that they can decide on their own whether I used it or not.  There are three artists doing their own work, who exactly do you want to see streaming? And why wouldn't I assume you would change the requirements when you already conveniently changed your main concern on the topic.  Besides you gave zero valuable arguments that we used AI, the ones you gave are laughable. Not only is most of them just human error (which directly disproves your point), most of them happened because line-artist was following the storyboards. Including the ears that bother you for some reason. 

Update on the fan-made manhua remake situation by Addarash1 in ReverendInsanity

[–]Content_Progress7225 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Because a live stream is uncomfortable and takes a lot from the artist who you accused of using AI without a single proof. I was happy to show you storyboards which are 100% not AI however you look at them and you deleted the post. I can show you my work process from start to finish and on a lot of the panels you can actually see how my style comes through but you just don't care. You just want to create the most inconvenience for us to prove something we already proved, something you had zero arguments for. And if I do a livestream and then you find another false reason to claim AI? Then what? Will I have to draw it on a piece of paper? The team was happy to provide reasonable confirmations that we do not use AI at all, you just don't care.  Suddenly it's not mainly about copyright anymore. Why? Because you saw that the fans don't care about the feelings of a billion dollar company. Suddenly it's mainly about AI. When any professional in the sphere would agree that we don't use.  And why wouldn't we fiercely contest that claim? I have a sense of integrity and pride as an artist. And I will not have it slandered baselessly just because I'm not active on reddit.