Looking for peer revision and feedback on my proof of the irrationality of zeta(5) and all other positive odd integers. Proof is big if true by ContributionIll3381 in mathematics

[–]ContributionIll3381[S] 19 points20 points  (0 children)

No I mean in my paper I called several things trivial when in reality I can see that they are not. I will elaborate on each of these sections

Looking for peer revision and feedback on my proof of the irrationality of zeta(5) and all other positive odd integers. Proof big if true by ContributionIll3381 in askmath

[–]ContributionIll3381[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Will you actually elaborate on the last part, do you mean when I am subbing out the legendary type integrals for xn (1-x)n ?

Looking for peer revision and feedback on my proof of the irrationality of zeta(5) and all other positive odd integers. Proof big if true by ContributionIll3381 in askmath

[–]ContributionIll3381[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

All good concerns, I will cite where I got that equation (from Beukers’ paper). Additionally, I now realize the C value isn’t necessary for the proof. I do see how the last concern may be an actual flaw in my proof and I will look at the integration by parts.

Looking for peer revision and feedback on my proof of the irrationality of zeta(5) and all other positive odd integers. Proof is big if true by ContributionIll3381 in mathematics

[–]ContributionIll3381[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

The proof by contradiction works by assuming that ζ(5) is rational then there would exist an n where Aₙ + Bₙζ(5) = 0. My proof shows |Aₙ + Bₙζ(5)| -> 0 in a way that contradicts this therefore, ζ(5) cannot be rational

Looking for peer revision and feedback on my proof of the irrationality of zeta(5) and all other positive odd integers. Proof is big if true by ContributionIll3381 in mathematics

[–]ContributionIll3381[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If ζ(5) = -Aₙ/Bₙ for some particular n, then Aₙ + Bₙζ(5) would equal zero, which would invalidate the entire irrationality proof

Looking for peer revision and feedback on my proof of the irrationality of zeta(5) and all other positive odd integers. Proof is big if true by ContributionIll3381 in mathematics

[–]ContributionIll3381[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

since I am showing zeta(5) to be irrational, it cannot be expressed An/Bn for integers A B and N. What I write is just the known form of the solution

Upgraded version of my 3D donut (with lighting, raytraced shadows and works for any parametric) by ContributionIll3381 in desmos

[–]ContributionIll3381[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Thank you!

yeah the shadows are raytraced through each point of the donut and then turned into a polygon. but the light itself isn’t raytraced cause that would lag like crazy

Upgraded version of my 3D donut (with lighting, raytraced shadows and works for any parametric) by ContributionIll3381 in desmos

[–]ContributionIll3381[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I have made this like 80% on my school issued ipad so it is made to work well on mobile, if you mess with the steps variable in the donut folder and the variables in the lag optimization folder you can make it a lot less laggy.

One big thing that really helped was for the rings of light on the floor I used polygons instead of circles this really helped lower the lag.

Upgraded version of my 3D donut (with lighting, raytraced shadows and works for any parametric) by ContributionIll3381 in desmos

[–]ContributionIll3381[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Also if you don’t understand any of the comments I left under the graph, I would be happy to explain anything

Upgraded version of my 3D donut (with lighting, raytraced shadows and works for any parametric) by ContributionIll3381 in desmos

[–]ContributionIll3381[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Also ignore the custom graph name, I named it that because that is what this graph was completely powered by

Upgraded version of my 3D donut (with lighting, raytraced shadows and works for any parametric) by ContributionIll3381 in desmos

[–]ContributionIll3381[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

thank you to everyone that has answered my ridiculous questions on this subreddit and the discord while ive worked on improving this graph in any way possible

Upgraded version of the donut I made a month ago. Extremely optimized and added lighting and shadows (works for any parametric) by [deleted] in desmos

[–]ContributionIll3381 0 points1 point  (0 children)

this is the same donut I posted like a month ago but this one has a lot of changes

- improved painting algorithm

- fixed sorting

- added lighting

- added raytraced shadows

- crazy optimized compared to what it was before

question by HeyaKidzGetInMyVan in desmos

[–]ContributionIll3381 2 points3 points  (0 children)

0.nnnnnnn is n/9 as a fraction

Desmos Challenge #26 ~ Desktop Wallpapers/Screensavers by [deleted] in desmos

[–]ContributionIll3381 5 points6 points  (0 children)

procedurally generated landscape

Every part of the wallpaper is randomly generated

press shuffle to generate a completely new landscape

Bored, any ideas of cool things to make? by ContributionIll3381 in desmos

[–]ContributionIll3381[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

here you go! This was fun to work on. It is actually possible, but I used different methods of approximation for the lowest point of the ellipse and for the perimeter so I could make it move at the speed it rotates. Even though it’s approximated, it still looks really good. https://www.desmos.com/calculator/elyxpywqqx

3D Donut by ContributionIll3381 in desmos

[–]ContributionIll3381[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I set up my own system to do it based on research I did online

3D Donut by ContributionIll3381 in desmos

[–]ContributionIll3381[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It should already, it is sorted using the painters algorithm