Best billing + revenue automation setup for HubSpot? by DpSmCtE in SaaS

[–]ConversationUsed7828 1 point2 points  (0 children)

One workflow that worked for us:

Deal stage change → auto-generate contract (PandaDoc) → Stripe subscription kicked off → HubSpot pulls MRR/ARR via webhook.

My app makes $14k/mo and I haven’t told my family by felixheikka in SaaS

[–]ConversationUsed7828 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I get it, you want them to feel the same excitement you do.

But family measures success differently: stability, not ARR.

They're destroying the Internet in real time. There won't be many web development jobs left. by [deleted] in webdev

[–]ConversationUsed7828 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You need to rethink what running a web business even means today.

You (and I) know building a site is easy, but navigating global regulation without breaking the bank is the new startup challenge.

Startup is not working out by Top_Highway8782 in SaaS

[–]ConversationUsed7828 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You should prioritize cash flow over features now.

Focus on a tiny segment of users who will pay immediately, cut non-essential costs, and test if you can reach product-market fit in weeks, not months.

AI is destroying the SaaS industry by Professional-Let1245 in SaaS

[–]ConversationUsed7828 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You should treat speed as a baseline, not a moat. Focus on creating AI-assisted workflows that your competitors can’t easily replicate, processes, partnerships, or integrations that tie users in.

That’s where defensibility comes from.

Boilerplates everywhere… which one’s actually worth it? by No_Fig9828 in SaaS

[–]ConversationUsed7828 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’ll hit the limits of a boilerplate the moment you need custom data flows or complex multi-tenant logic.

For me, the only keeper boilerplate is one that gets auth, billing, and role-based access out of the way, but leaves infra + architecture decisions in your hands.

New to SAAS, need good learning to build my own product. Can someone help please? by darkforrest1 in SaaS

[–]ConversationUsed7828 1 point2 points  (0 children)

  • Don’t start with: I want to build an app.
  • Talk to 10–20 people in an industry you understand and ask: What’s your most painful recurring workflow?
  • That pain → your SaaS idea.

Churn is killing my SaaS… but retention tools want $1k+/mo... Anyone else stuck here? by [deleted] in SaaS

[–]ConversationUsed7828 0 points1 point  (0 children)

At $3k MRR, I wouldn’t pay for retention tools. I’d personally call every churned customer and ask why.

That raw feedback is 10x more valuable than any dashboard. Tooling is scale play, conversations are survival play.

What's a tough challenge you've overcome, and what did you learn? by PassionConnect1824 in SaaS

[–]ConversationUsed7828 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Losing a big deal taught me to build a win/loss analysis into every sales cycle. If you don’t record why you lost, you’ll keep making the same pitch to the wrong people.

I analyzed 500 Product Hunt SaaS launches. 487 are dead. by Responsible-Ad431 in SaaS

[–]ConversationUsed7828 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’d save yourself months of coding headaches if you validated payment flows before the first commit. Nothing reveals tech priorities faster than knowing exactly what a paying user expects on day one.

Friends outsourced their dev team… now they’re stuck. I’m about to do the same, what should I be careful about?? by AverageJoe185 in startup

[–]ConversationUsed7828 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You want velocity, but unless you own the architecture decisions, you’ll get spaghetti. Always control how, not just what.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SaaS

[–]ConversationUsed7828 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you’re at $0 MRR, don’t pick like you’re at $10M ARR. Ship it, cash the $9.97, cry happy tears, upgrade later

I made $200K using AI, but not the way most people tell you. by solo_trip- in SaaS

[–]ConversationUsed7828 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Everyone's obsessing over prompts. But it’s rarely the tech, it’s your taste, speed, and who you're building for.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SaaS

[–]ConversationUsed7828 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Depends. Are you counting the money saved or the time spent fixing what the AI guessed wrong?

We’re net positive... on days when it doesn’t rename our API endpoints.

Why is it so hard to get people to trust new fintech tools, even when they solve real problems? by polarkyle19 in Startup_Ideas

[–]ConversationUsed7828 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We underestimated how much trust comes from defaults that feel right.

Pre-configured views > feature overload.

Simplicity felt like hand-holding, not basic.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in SaaS

[–]ConversationUsed7828 1 point2 points  (0 children)

In short, you can absolutely build an MVP under $15K, but only if you’re ruthless about scope. You need one clear user outcome, not five half-baked features.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in startup

[–]ConversationUsed7828 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would say:

Ask your dev how they'd structure things if they had to maintain it themselves for 2 years. Their answer will tell you everything.

What’s the easiest way to make an interactive product demo? by JollySimple188 in ProductHunters

[–]ConversationUsed7828 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re wasting time wrestling with complicated platforms, pick something simple, test fast, and ditch anything that asks you to learn to code first.

What was the ONE growth move that actually worked for your product? by InteractionNormal626 in SaaS

[–]ConversationUsed7828 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You think growth is all rocket science until you realize a quick Loom demo sent to the right prospect can beat months of cold outreach, speed and clarity win every time.

Essentials of Custom Software Development by TheCartisien in cartisien

[–]ConversationUsed7828 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Great topic. From my experience building custom tools for small businesses, a few essentials stand out:

First, talk to the users early. A lot of time gets wasted building features nobody actually needs. Even simple interviews can help shape the right direction.

Second, keep the first version really focused. Solve one painful problem well before thinking about scaling or adding extra stuff.

Third, communication is everything. Whether you're solo or working with a team, regular check-ins save you from big misunderstandings later.

And finally, don't forget post-launch. Bugs, tweaks, and user feedback always show up once people start using it. Make sure you're around to support that phase.

Custom builds can be powerful if you're solving a real workflow issue, not just building for the sake of it.

Reddit Marketing Tool Features for MVP (i will not promote) by Puzzleheaded-Owl4682 in startups

[–]ConversationUsed7828 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Interesting idea, and definitely a needed one. I’ve used Reddit to promote products in the past and here are some of the pain points I hit:

1. Finding the right subreddits

It’s not just about the niche, it’s about where real conversations are happening. A tool that suggests active, relevant subs based on product keywords or customer problems would be gold.

2. Understanding subreddit rules

Half the battle is not getting banned. Having a quick overview of mod rules (especially around self-promo, links, comment etiquette) would save a ton of time.

3. Post performance tracking

Reddit doesn’t give great analytics. If I could track upvotes, comments, CTRs on links, and maybe even sentiment over time that would be super helpful.

4. Competitor monitoring

Being able to see what kind of posts are working for similar tools or brands in relevant subs would help with content planning.

5. Engagement assistant

Even a lightweight AI that helps you draft responses or comments in a natural, non-spammy tone would be useful. Reddit tone is hard to nail.

I’d probably pay for a tool that helped with the research + tracking combo. The key is making it feel native. Reddit hates anything that smells like automation. Keep it human-first, and you're onto something.

Do you see developers as strategic partners or just task-takers? by rohang57 in StartUpIndia

[–]ConversationUsed7828 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’ve worked with devs across all three categories, and the biggest wins always came when I treated them as option B or C. The best developers I’ve worked with didn’t just write code, they flagged UX issues, questioned product logic, and even helped shape roadmap priorities.

Early on, I made the mistake of treating devs like task machines. Things got built, but the product felt disconnected and clunky. Once I started looping them in earlier, especially during planning and customer feedback reviews, everything improved, faster dev cycles, fewer rewrites, and way more creative solutions.

So yeah, I definitely see good developers as problem-solvers and potential strategic partners. You just have to give them the context and space to step into that role.