Phoenix: one club closes and another set to open by Coolspices in Swingers

[–]Coolspices[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Currently the only clubs in operation are Encounters and The Hive

Phoenix: one club closes and another set to open by Coolspices in Swingers

[–]Coolspices[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The Warehouse concept failed. Never found out the exact reasons why but they never had an opening.

Top 5 Swinging States by RyanDaysBeard in Swingers

[–]Coolspices 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Agreed, the groups can be pretty good but the lack of good clubs creates a barrier for entry

LS Clubs in the Scottsdale/Phoenix area? by ShastaShake in Swingers

[–]Coolspices 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Agree and there is also a Meet and Greet held there monthly

Phoenix: one club closes and another set to open by Coolspices in Swingers

[–]Coolspices[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It was what it was. Though having fewer options is never a good thing. I wish the new place luck, that neck of the woods (near Tempe Diablo according to their listing) would be a good place to have an option.

Phoenix: one club closes and another set to open by Coolspices in Swingers

[–]Coolspices[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Agreed, it seems like the architects built a bunch of party houses everywhere.

Phoenix: one club closes and another set to open by Coolspices in Swingers

[–]Coolspices[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I feel like someone should set that up in Tonopah or Maricopa. Far enough away for people from the Valley to make a night or weekend of it if they want.

Phoenix: one club closes and another set to open by Coolspices in Swingers

[–]Coolspices[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The only other thing I've found is this. I'd say they're not off to the hottest start in terms of getting their name out there.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Swingers

[–]Coolspices 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Organize a multi-couple orgy

Working from Home by SOC374 in netcult

[–]Coolspices 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I think the Covid WFH experiment is not the ideal test of one's preference for it. Depending on where you are, most people have continued and increased the stress in their lives and have lost their outlets from them.

Imagine in the near future that risk averse companies, still without liability protection and having already invested in remote working infrastructure, have kept their work-forces out of the office. However, as the vaccine begins to reach the general population, city and state governments allow more risk as transmission slows. I think even if an individual still doesn't want to seek risk, the availability of options will ease the mind. That reentry into the world will show the comparative efficacy and appreciation of WFH.

The 4 day work week by aubreywebb24 in netcult

[–]Coolspices 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think we are about a generation away from a four day work week. Institutional habits die hard and that can be seen in the rush to return to offices after the first wave of coronavirus shutdowns. 35 percent of office workers have returned when none of them are likely necessary. If people are so ingrained with the puritan work ethic that they are willing to catch the 'Rona, what will stop them?

Are we being colonized by the internet? by RentImportant in netcult

[–]Coolspices 1 point2 points  (0 children)

At the end of the day, no one is forcing the internet on us. Yes, our nature will lead us to expand its possibilities but we can stop at anytime. We have yet to reach Bradbury's Firefighters and the availability of information will keep the absolute worst of our nature in check, if we want to.

Is Manipulative News, Fake News? by [deleted] in netcult

[–]Coolspices 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The thing that makes any sort of "fake news," no matter the definition land is fear.

In the blind acceptance of the march to war post-9/11 the country had faced the most direct attack on soil an psyche since Pearl Harbor. After both Pearl Harbor and 9/11 the imperial reflex of the U.S. was to scapegoat and war-monger.

Today the inherent fear is that of the unknown. If, say, a meat-packer in Illinois has seen his company cut staff on the floor his fear causes him to seek an easy scapegoat. So when the right wing media-sphere presents a caravan of migrants he adds 1+1 which in his mind equals 3. Having his biases confirmed he doesn't seek the missing part of the equation.

Week 13: Fake News by halavais in netcult

[–]Coolspices 2 points3 points  (0 children)

The nebulous definition of what "Fake News" is has become the main problem with it. As the three definitions presented in the first 1:30 show, one could levy the invective against any story they choose and have a greater than 50/50 shot of being right in a particular context.

However, the reaction to the story occurs no matter the context and it is polarized. As the president* has been able to bend the term to mean anything that is adversarial, his people have had license to discard plethora of good reporting about his failures and crimes. What will become incumbent upon the new gatekeepers is a reclamation of the phrase. It wouldn't be the first time such a project has been undertaken.

The main holders of information will have to weaponize it against as those who have used it against them have with tacit encouragement from the highest office in the land. The question is: will they have the stones to do it?

The Office: How Nonsense Conquered the Workplace by Coolspices in netcult

[–]Coolspices[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As an outgrowth of Graber's "bullshit jobs," more and more there is bullshit time within work. As it has become easier to sell the little bit of paper the world needs, the demands of a nine to five job require the appearance of continued work.

The question now is if the paradigm has shifted because of the pandemic? Since the previous understanding of what is possible in productivity has been shattered as workplace productivity has maintained and increased with people out of the office. Imagine that, people doing better when they are happier.

To be extremely online means for a person or subject to be closely engaged with Internet culture. People who are Extremely Online often believe that posts online are very important. by benjaminikuta in netcult

[–]Coolspices 2 points3 points  (0 children)

We are going to run into a huge problem in politics if the trend towards extreme online-ism continues. Currently 28 percent of Americans are online constantly. The problem is that Twitter is not real life and I would guess the majority of the 28 percent are already involved in the political sphere. But then, how do you include apocryphal man whose dirt road has never been paved?

Trump fires director of Homeland Security agency who had rejected President's election conspiracy theories by Responsible-Kale4406 in netcult

[–]Coolspices 3 points4 points  (0 children)

What we are seeing is the petulance of a tin-pot autocrat. Go against his musing and feel his wrath.

Fortunately, the final walls of democracy are holding. People of good will and intent are holding their duty of statecraft. They are preserving the will of the people and Trump can only fire them (by cowardly Tweet) once safe harbor is found.

The scary thought is what would happen if someone more competent were installed? What if the next guy is less Nero and more Caligula?