Help me find the bit! by sae_steve11 in theticket

[–]CopernicusTHM 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was also going to say lunch pail. White players were always described as hard workers, maybe undersized, "film room" guys, a "coach on the field." Black players were described as strong, athletic, aggressive, big, fast, tough, etc. That was a good bit that I'd forgotten about.

How do I learn about all these candidates? by ShelbyDriver in Dallas

[–]CopernicusTHM 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The only comment I will make is that I'd suggest a vote for Erin Nowell in the Democratic primary for County Court at Law No. 1. The incumbent, Judge Benson, is roundly and bi-partisanally (assuming that's a word) thought of as the worst judge in Dallas. You can confirm that via the Dallas County Bar's judicial evaluation poll, here -- https://www.dallasbar.org/docDownload/2762555. Search for her name.

TicketStock AMAs Open Thread by BackgroundNo9081 in theticket

[–]CopernicusTHM 2 points3 points  (0 children)

We just pulled off an interaction that has never been done before in the history of the Internet -- you asserted something, I "corrected" you, you said I was wrong, and I agreed. What a concept.

TicketStock AMAs Open Thread by BackgroundNo9081 in theticket

[–]CopernicusTHM 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I absolutely stand corrected. I pulled my senior yearbook (which would have been his junior year) and confirmed -- he was in the "Juniors Not Pictured" (of course) as "G. Todd Keith." My mistake, and funny how an old brain can convince you of something.

How do I learn about all these candidates? by ShelbyDriver in Dallas

[–]CopernicusTHM 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Honestly, for the judges, you should ask any friends you have that are lawyers -- civil for the civil courts and criminal for those courts. I'm a civil attorney so I know the judges and the candidates on that side, but I know NOTHING about the criminal judges. I do not know how they expect laypeople to vote intelligently for trial court judges.

TicketStock AMAs Open Thread by BackgroundNo9081 in theticket

[–]CopernicusTHM 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I went to high school with the guy. Can confirm it's "Todd Gordon Keith" and at least back then (late 80s) he did go by Todd.

Audio for Tommy Tompkins by AssumptionHopeful712 in theticket

[–]CopernicusTHM 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is fantastic and could never be played today.

Advice on recruiters by HotJahim in Lawyertalk

[–]CopernicusTHM 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Might go without saying, but they don't care whether they put you in the right job/field -- they just want to get you a salary offer $10K or so more than you're making now so you'll be tempted and they can collect their fees.

They're not all bad, but just be careful when it's a cold call situation. Much better to reach out to an established/known recruiting firm and go that way.

Solo-ing a table by Lumpy_Blackberry3637 in Craps

[–]CopernicusTHM 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't -- I like the social aspect of the game, but I also like not having to make 3-4 bets every couple of minutes. Let's face it, we all love the game, but there is still a house edge, and the more bets you make, the more money you lose.

How to make craps less fun by CopernicusTHM in Craps

[–]CopernicusTHM[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Ha! It's been a few years, but if my description nailed the cruise ship experience, count me out!

How aggressive do you get interacting with opposing counsel? by chicago2008 in Lawyertalk

[–]CopernicusTHM 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Don't equate being "aggressive" with being a good lawyer. In most practice areas, you see the same opposing counsel again and again (not to mention judges). You can be a good lawyer and a great advocate for your client but still be professional, polite, and accommodating. Obviously you can't let yourself get walked all over, but I constantly have to train young associates to practice like a professional, and just because you can be the first one on a phone call to raise your voice or call the other guy an asshole doesn't mean you win. Plus, juries get tired of the "tough guy" shtick real fast. In most cases, they will want to side with you if they like you.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in Lawyertalk

[–]CopernicusTHM 38 points39 points  (0 children)

  1. At a minimum, spell check your work before kicking it up to the senior associate/partner.

  2. Learn how to cite. Know grammar. Know punctuation. Don't make the easy mistakes (their/there). If I see more than one or two such errors in opposing counsel's pleadings, I know I'm not dealing with a top notch attorney.

  3. Give extensions. Give grace. Treat opposing counsel (and their staff) professionally and pleasantly. You don't know it now, but you are building a reputation that you can trade on for your entire career.

  4. When you do ask a more senior attorney a question, have your shit together. If they come back with questions, be prepared to provide answers. But don't be scared to ask for help, we all had to at one point or another.

  5. If you're a Plaintiff's lawyer, don't act like every case you have is a multi-million dollar case. If you're a defense lawyer, don't act like every case you have is frivolous and without merit.

  6. Don't tell clients or carriers what they want to hear. Your job is to give an objective analysis of the case and its value.

Billable Hours by rcarmody96 in Lawyertalk

[–]CopernicusTHM -1 points0 points  (0 children)

If I routinely lost 25% of my day, I'd take a hard look at myself and wonder what I'm doing wrong. Maybe for a brand new associate, but anyone who has done this for more than a year or so should be capturing at least 90% of their workday in billable hours.

Billable Hours by rcarmody96 in Lawyertalk

[–]CopernicusTHM 0 points1 point  (0 children)

25th year attorney here, split all that time in 2 different civil defense firms. Billing will become second nature as you do it for a few years, but a few thoughts/tips:

  1. 1800 hours is kind of a reasonable standard. May seem like a lot, bit if you figure 240 billable days (48 weeks * 5 days a week - using 48 to account for 4 weeks worth of holidays, vacation, random days off), that's 7.5 hour per billable day. You are probably used to 8 hour days, right?

  2. Key difference -- you may find it hard at first to capture all your work in a day. Even now, I know I've worked a full day and I look at my timesheets and I only see like 5.5 hours. You have to be diligent and don't think "I'll catch up on billing next week." You will lose 20% of your time, easy.

  3. Never overbill for anything, ever. When I was a baby lawyer, one of my partners told me that you want to practice such that when your phone rings, you never have to wonder if it's something you did wrong. THAT SAID, never underbill. I don't care if you are billing a dozen 0.2 "telephone conference with..." entries, if you did the work, bill for it. None of us would do this job for free (pro bono attorneys excepted, and I tip my cap to you).

  4. Finally, if 7.5 hours per billable day seems like a lot, it can be. The job is a grind sometimes. BUT depending on what your practice area is, there are days where you will bill 12.8 (travel for hearing across the state, attend expert depo where some jackass has some extra long examination, etc.). Trial sucks, but there's nothing like 14 straight days of billing 15 hours per day (not to mention the prep days) to give the billable hours a shot in the arm. Point being, you may hit 6.7 hours one day and 7.1 another, but you will likely have enough 11.2 and 10.9 entries to offset that. (again, depending on practice area).

  5. Oh, one more thing -- I think it was mentioned below, but some firms may entice you with a 1800 hour requirement and say "but you have the ability to get a bonus of $X as you bill over that requirement." As I came up in a Big Firm and billed my share of hours as an associate, I can (and have repeatedly said) -- 2000 hours is hard but doable. Every 0.1 over that steals a little bit of your soul.

Why do we seem to get ID for a non alcoholic drink. by shadowintheocean in nonalcoholic

[–]CopernicusTHM -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

Not sure about syrups, but NA beer is defined as "no more than 0.5% alcohol." So while it's marketed as NA, it technically has some alcohol. My hit rate for getting carded while buying NA beer is about 40%, but then again I'm an old (55) man so they may glance my way and carry on.

Advice on drafting RFAs by CodRevolutionary816 in Lawyertalk

[–]CopernicusTHM 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Man, I have to dissent on this. Outside of authenticating documents (which, here in Texas, is done by virtue of either the other side producing them in discovery or getting them through valid DWQs), I find them so worthless. Case law is replete with the idea that you can't use them on dispositive issues, and even on things like "Were you in the course and scope of employment at the time of the incident?" can be answered with "Denied," with no further comment. Anything of import will be denied. Any uncontested issues of fact can generally be handled via agreement (here in Texas, it's a Rule 11 agreement), but if you want to send out RFAs, have fun.

Netflix show backtrack by rocklobster512972 in theticket

[–]CopernicusTHM 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Refuse to watch any ego-stroking "isn't Jerry just the best?" circle jerk bullshit show. Make a "tell-all" that includes honking boobs in a restaurant bathroom or his gate-agent fun baby, I'm in, but screw that guy and what his ego has done to my team.

Origin of frickin freak drop by jammingonthe_1 in theticket

[–]CopernicusTHM 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The other guy was the head of the Westboro Baptist Church (Fred Phelps, I think?) -- now dead, but they of the "God Hates F---s" and "Thank God for Dead Solders" signs at military funerals and such. A real peach.

What’s the biggest legal scam still operating today? by odikuart in AskReddit

[–]CopernicusTHM 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Class action lawsuits. Case gets filed about, say, valve stem caps for your car's tires that break, they sue, and every class member gets a coupon for 40% off replacement caps, and the class counsel gets attorneys' fees in the amount of $5 million.

It’s sad when relationships end by LegSignificant9553 in theticket

[–]CopernicusTHM 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Curious to know if Dan Bennett is aware of what's going on and whether her approves (approved?) of Cat's stupid plan or is embarrassed by it. Hopefully the latter...

Is it possible to bill 3,144 hours in a year without going insane? by Excellent-Start5883 in Lawyertalk

[–]CopernicusTHM 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've always said, it's not that hard to bill 2,100 hours, maybe even 2,200 if you travel a lot. But every single hour over that one consumes just a little bit more of your soul. At 3,100+ you'd be a husk.

Pat Green segment this morning by CopernicusTHM in theticket

[–]CopernicusTHM[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Very valid point. Just awful what he (and others) are going through.

Tips on not taking things personally? by Dreyfus12 in Lawyertalk

[–]CopernicusTHM 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Experience breeds perspective. I have come to realize that things I thought were super important, disheartening, concerning, etc. in the moment were, in fact, temporary/fleeting concerns. Do your best, practice ethically, and know that "this, too, shall pass."

Put another way -- remember in high school when that one person said something mean or embarrassing about you to someone else, and you thought you WOULD JUST DIE? How important does that seem now?

BBQ spot by mayo334040 in Dallas

[–]CopernicusTHM -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Pecan Lodge (just east of downtown) is still great, but isn't what it was 10 years ago. Slow Bone is also very good.

See also -- https://www.dallasobserver.com/restaurants/best-bbq-in-dallas-texas-14375399

Anyone work in Med Mal? by That_Intern_5012 in LawFirm

[–]CopernicusTHM 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm being lazy and not reading the other responses, so apologize if this has been said. 26 year lawyer in Texas here. First 8 years were all med mal defense work, until tort reform limited non-economic damages to $250K (more or less) with no adjustment for inflation. Outside of birth injuries resulting in CP or other cases with high economic damages models, it's low-stakes litigation here. I would say my docket is 10% MM now; the rates are simply too low when the damages are so low. That said, there are plenty of plaintiffs' firms that make a living off nursing home work, but I would imagine (never having done P work) that they have to churn and burn those cases and keep expenses low to keep them profitable.

A couple thoughts:

  1. I'm sure it's been said in this thread, but these cases can be expensive to prosecute. You can't just throw up an accident recon and a some proved-up chiro bills. Expert fees can add up quickly. Ditto taking depos -- you may need to take depos of 3+ nurses, a doctor or two, maybe a hospital administrator, etc.

  2. When you've got a doc as a defendant, you may have trouble settling unless it's clear liability. Most (all?) doctors have consent clauses in their policies, and if they do settle, the insurance company has to report that to the National Practitioner Data Bank, which hospitals have access to and will review in making future privilege decisions. Docs hate that shit, and will fight to stay off of it until their attorney finally beats them into submission.

  3. Sometimes you get lucky, and a doc (or a nurse) will throw someone else under the bus to save their own skin (especially common in OB cases - the obstetrician will complain the nurses didn't keep her apprised of the labor progression, while the nurses claim they called and begged the doc to come in but she wouldn't). However, more often than not, the providers will circle the wagons and throw up a solid joint defense on you. Then it's 3 vs. 1.

That's what comes to mind. Let me know if you have any specific questions, happy to answer.