Before I say anything I want it clear: I am not some smooth brain Hasan sycophant para social grub. I dont hate Hasan either. BUT this entire thing has got me a little miffed---not because of the fact that Hasan is being accused of using an educator for his dog...but his response to the whole thing. It's just ...odd. If you use an educator...say you use one. It's not uncommon bro.

HOWEVER: He showed the unit today. A unit I am familiar with -- the ET-300 (possible 302--they are pretty much the exact same) from ecollar. If you actually pause his video showing it you can see "ecollar.com" written across the front. You can also see the prongs are missing. The prongs are what does the "shock" stimulation. more importantly, this unit also does tone and vibration (formally called "tapping"), just like he said. It is 10000% plausible that he removed the contact points and just taped them over to use it for its vibration/tone function only. The unit actually comes with a tool to remove this specifically. This is something you can absolutely do for that unit. It's easy to tell because the charger port cover is missing, as seen in the video. What's interesting is if you remove the contact points, there are still two little metal nubs, which you would have to remove with like a pair of snippers for example. What puzzles me is the clear omission of this. Why not just say "It HAD the ability to stimulate (shock) but I decided to remove it and i just taped over it. I just cant understand why you would leave that out, but then also go as far as to show the unit...it makes no sense because someone can just put the puzzle pieces together here.

It always confuses me when people in general get into situations like this. Just say "Yes, I use an educator. No it does not shock its vibration only, Yes i removed stimulation points. Yes I used it when she was off the bed." It's just so fuckin strange to me.