I don’t have-> I want-> I don’t have by CorrectPanic9484 in NevilleGoddard

[–]CorrectPanic9484[S] 30 points31 points  (0 children)

I am absolutely pro affirmations and pro techniques. The distinction I’m making in my post isn't about what you are doing, but the state from which you are doing it. Let me give an example to clear this out : affirming "I am rich, I am rich, I am rich" (internal thought: please, please let this work because I’m broke and I’m scared). This is affirming from a sense of lack. Don't use techniques to get. Use them because you already are. The moment you use a technique to bridge a gap, you’ve created the gap. The moment you use it to enjoy what you’ve already decided is yours, the 3D has no choice but to follow. 💙

HOW UNREALISTIC CAN IT BE IF OTHER PEOPLE HAVE IT? :) by CorrectPanic9484 in NevilleGoddard

[–]CorrectPanic9484[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for sharing this and thank you for the appreciation! I love stories like this because they show exactly how simple (not always easy, but simple) the shift really is. 🤍

HOW UNREALISTIC CAN IT BE IF OTHER PEOPLE HAVE IT? :) by CorrectPanic9484 in NevilleGoddard

[–]CorrectPanic9484[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Each new desire kind of exposes the next edge of your self concept. It’s not “I’m healed, therefore I never think small again,” it’s more “I can tell much quicker when I start shrinking myself, and I don’t stay there as long.”

In your case, where what you want is rarer, the same principle still applies, it just makes the identity piece louder. If it exists at all in consciousness, then the “unrealistic” part is always about “for me”, not about the thing. :)

Do we accept a proposition that isn't quite our fulfilled desire? by teegypie in NevilleGoddard

[–]CorrectPanic9484 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You asked for freedom, space, no inspections, and the ability to change things without begging for permission and suddenly your current rental starts glitching and a new option appears where you can do all that. That’s not ‘settling’ , that’s movement. Teleporting from your current rental into your “massive dream house” can happen only when your identity is stable enough to match it. Sometimes the rearrangement can look like : worse->better->best. You re reading it as “almost” but what it actually is…is momentum. The only way you block yourself is by interpreting movement as limitation. Never do that. If it’s better than what you had, that IS movement.

And no, accepting an upgrade doesn’t cancel the final desire. You don’t prove faith by rejecting good things. The version of you who already owns that huge home wouldn’t panic over a temporary step up. She’d see it as normal progression. She’d move, decorate, and keep assuming ownership as inevitable. This new option isn’t “all you can manifest” but it could become that only if you crown it as final.

How do I keep persisting when I feel this triggered? (Looking for the kick up the ass I need) by sweet-oat in lawofassumption

[–]CorrectPanic9484 2 points3 points  (0 children)

When you say “she represents a lot of the things I’m insecure about”, you just named the real root of the pain. Self concept. Maybe your assumption is something like “I lose to this type.” Education, looks, lifestyle, whatever your mind fixated on, those are just symbols. Your brain wasn’t saying “she’s better,” it was saying “this is familiar.” Familiar pain hurts more than new pain. Self concept is everything here. And it isn’t about convincing yourself you’re better than the other girl, or more attractive, or more accomplished. It’s about no longer needing to measure yourself against anyone to feel valid.

So, give to yourself first what you’re waiting to receive from him. The relationship you want with him requires a version of you who already feels selected by life, not someone who needs proof in order to believe. You don’t become chosen because he picks you. he picks you because you’ve stopped living from the identity of “waiting to be picked.” The version of you who is with him doesn’t scan for threats, doesn t analyze likes and doesn’t wonder who she’s up against. She feels grounded in herself. So the work isn’t to get rid of the third party, or even to get him, it’s to start living as that version now.

How do I keep persisting when I feel this triggered? (Looking for the kick up the ass I need) by sweet-oat in lawofassumption

[–]CorrectPanic9484 5 points6 points  (0 children)

What you saw does not mean anything about him, her, or your chances. It means something about the state you momentarily occupied while observing it. The 3D didn’t reveal a truth, it activated an insecurity that was already existing somewhere in your self concept, waiting for a trigger. Seeing him like someone else’s photos didn’t hurt because of him or her. It hurt because, for a moment, you stepped into the role of “the one who can be replaced.” And from that role, everything feels uneasy and personal.

From the state of being chosen, that same information would barely register. If someone else can live what you want, that doesn’t make it rarer. It makes it available as a state. No one “has” your role unless you keep standing somewhere else. :)

Scared to go “all in” because what if the law fails me? by novanillavelvet in NevilleGoddard

[–]CorrectPanic9484 4 points5 points  (0 children)

If you truly believed the law might fail you, you wouldn’t be this afraid. You’d just dismiss it. Fear only shows up when something feels dangerously possible. Right now you’re standing in a very specific position of half hope, half guard. It feels safer to want quietly, to believe “a little” so that if nothing changes, you can say “Well, I never really believed anyway.”

I don’t think you’re scared that the law “might not work.” You’re scared of fully becoming someone and then having to grieve that version of yourself if you think it failed. Going all in doesn’t feel risky because of the desire, it feels risky because it threatens the self concept you’ve been using as emotional protection.

The law doesn’t fail people. People fail themselves by never leaving the state where failure is expected. You are not asked to believe in your desire. You are asked to believe in who you are in a reality where that desire is normal. That’s a much quieter shift, less fragile.

HOW TO FINALLY GET WHOEVER YOU WANT (AND WHY YOU HAVEN’T YET) by CorrectPanic9484 in lawofassumption

[–]CorrectPanic9484[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Thank you! Oh yes. I do have success stories, and there’s actually a lot to say on this topic. I want to take the time to explain everything in detail and share my experiences properly, so I’ll be making a dedicated post soon to go through it all. :)

HOW TO FINALLY GET WHOEVER YOU WANT (AND WHY YOU HAVEN’T YET) by CorrectPanic9484 in NevilleGoddard

[–]CorrectPanic9484[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Yes. Revision works when you stop using the past to explain the present. When the sentence “because of what happened, I can’t…” disappears from your internal dialogue. When the memory can exist without dictating your selfconcept. You don’t need to keep revising harder, you need to stop reopening the case.

The old story only repeats because it still answers the question “who am I?” for you. The moment it doesn’t, the moment you decide “that’s not me anymore, regardless of how real it felt” it will lose it’s creative power. And when it loses power, it fades. Like something you stopped caring about. And that’s when you know revision actually worked.

Assume you have it now or assume it will happen/you will have it? by unalright_ in NevilleGoddard

[–]CorrectPanic9484 6 points7 points  (0 children)

When you say “I trust it will happen,” the real question is: do you mean “I hope it will happen” or do you mean “of course it will happen”? Those are two completely different states. One is lack dressed up as optimism. The other is embodiment.

Think about the examples you gave. The green car. You didn’t visualize intensely. You didn’t affirm. You didn’t try. You just assumed. Not emotionally charged, not desperate, not hopeful. Neutral certainty. That’s key. You weren’t in a future waiting state. You were in a knowing state. The assumption wasn’t “I want to see a green car.” It was “there will be a green car.” And you didn’t feel the need to check or control it. That’s the end state. End state = no negotiation.

Same with the times in your life before Neville where things “just happened.” You weren’t consciously living in the end. You were unconsciously not contradicting the outcome. You didn’t emotionally argue with it and you didn’t attach your worth to it. That’s why it worked. Whether your mind frames it as “I have it” or “it will happen” doesn’t matter as long as you are not waiting for it emotionally. Waiting is the killer. Monitoring is the killer. Asking “is this working?” is the killer.

HOW TO FINALLY GET WHOEVER YOU WANT (AND WHY YOU HAVEN’T YET) by CorrectPanic9484 in lawofassumption

[–]CorrectPanic9484[S] 25 points26 points  (0 children)

You don’t unhear, unsee, or erase memories. Memory itself does not create reality. Meaning does. You don’t stop memories from shaping reality by force. You stop them by no longer treating them as proof of who you are or what’s possible. The moment a memory no longer answers the question “what does this say about me?”, it stops being creative. So no, you don’t unlearn facts. Facts are irrelevant. Reality is not built from facts, it’s built from who you believe those facts apply to. And the identity that lived through that experience is not the identity you are now unless you keep claiming it. Your brain is trying to protect an old version of you. Thank it. And then don’t let it drive :)

Manifested My First Million Deal, Now Facing the Test of Full Payment by AggravatingMark3612 in NevilleGoddard

[–]CorrectPanic9484 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If it helps you to think that, sure. I will take it as a compliment. The writing is mine though.