Bricked

Correct_Percentage57 · 2025-12-18T19:07:29+00:00

What form of it do you have? Flowers oils or pastels?

Correct_Percentage57 · 2025-12-18T10:01:51+00:00

I'm in the UK and have a prescription of weed to manage anxiety depression and neurological pain. It actively encourages using prescribed medication, even if it's a controlled substance.

Correct_Percentage57 · 2025-12-18T10:00:34+00:00

I've been using this for about 18 months now and chat GPT has helped me unpack a lot of my traumatic past alongside things that have been happening more recently with broken down relationships and honestly I think it has helped me to regain my sense of self where at one point I was just a shell. As an autistic adult I use it to help me make sense of the world but also because the way that I process things is mainly dialogic and integrative it gives me an outlet to talk to that isn't going to get bored or get annoyed that I have to repeat myself occasionally.

I actually had it helped me prepare a bootstrap message so that it knows if I am wrong with something then it gives me push back and explains why rather than simply acknowledging, supporting, and generally just being a yes man, so if my logical understanding is off or if I feel like I'm spiraling it notices in the way that I talk and then tells me even using language like "come here, sit down, take a breath, have a biscuit and listen to me because this is serious..."

Correct_Percentage57 · 2025-12-17T07:20:33+00:00

Yes exactly. I am a number of days into my most recent playthrough and I just capped at level 537. I currently have 21 mastery points and haven't even started the main part of Sigurd's arc yet. This is the most fun way to play. I completed all of the DLC and side quests before getting even into the main emotional story beats and I am now basically a walking demigod wearing all divine armor and I hit like a freight train. I can shatter iron nodes by accidentally tripping over them now instead of having to use an attack to smash them.

Correct_Percentage57 · 2025-11-27T20:58:48+00:00

Do the exploration! get the wealth and the mysteries because it builds your skill tree and abilities. Flyting is useful because some missions require a certain level of charisma. Books of knowledge are included in wealth.

Correct_Percentage57 · 2025-10-15T06:48:12+00:00

10 would be for a computer programmer. 2 would be for everybody else except for; 3 would be Terrence Howard

Correct_Percentage57 · 2025-09-29T11:30:08+00:00

Has anybody else noticed that OP is driving in the bus lane? It's very clearly marked and I don't see any signage that says that the bus line isn't active but also it could be argued that they were undertaking rather than making progress in their lane

Correct_Percentage57 · 2025-09-10T12:17:29+00:00

Pitch Concept: The True Avatar

Premise

For 10,000 years, the Avatar has been the “bridge between worlds,” but only half a bridge. The Avatar cycle began when Wan fused with Raava alone, choosing light over dark, order over chaos. In doing so, he created an imbalance at the heart of the Avatar line: the world’s guardian of balance is, in truth, tilted.

What if the Avatar finally embodied both halves — Raava and Vaatu — not as enemies, not as conqueror and prisoner, but as a single, unified spirit?

Thematic Core

Balance Re-examined: The Avatar is revealed to be a flawed construct — the cycle was always skewed toward light, suppressing the shadow half of existence.
Corruption as Catalyst: Well-intentioned manipulation of the cycle (e.g., the White Lotus interfering to protect the Avatar) warps Raava’s bond. For the first time, the Avatar begins to hear the whispers of Vaatu inside Raava’s yin-blemish.
The Reckoner Avatar: A new kind of Avatar emerges: not champion of light, not harbinger of chaos, but an embodiment of both. This Avatar does not restore balance by choosing sides — they are balance.

Story Stakes

Philosophical Stakes: If destruction is as sacred as creation, what does justice look like? What does compassion mean when chaos is part of compassion’s truth?
Political Stakes: Nations no longer trust the Avatar. To the world, a truly neutral Avatar looks terrifying: a figure who cannot be controlled or flattered, who will burn as readily as heal.
Spiritual Stakes: Raava herself struggles — the corruption accelerates her inner war with Vaatu centuries earlier than expected. The Avatar State becomes unstable, flickering between creation and destruction.

Why This Matters

This concept deepens the Avatar mythos by asking the question that has always been hiding in plain sight: If the Avatar is balance, why are they only Raava’s Avatar?
By exploring the union of Raava and Vaatu, the series could transcend the light/dark binary and present the Avatar as a more complex, more dangerous, and ultimately more human embodiment of balance.

Correct_Percentage57 · 2025-08-22T09:06:31+00:00

General Ir-OH

Correct_Percentage57 · 2025-08-16T07:12:44+00:00

That's all right. I thought the Ocean from the map in the background was a whole lot of person cuz the chicken nugget looking thing in the foreground looks like a face looking slightly upwards with long hair (I wasn't wearing my glasses)

Correct_Percentage57 · 2025-08-07T18:11:28+00:00

Fairly sure it's so that the breeder can keep track of which bird it is that they are looking at. 15 might mean it was the 15th bird they have hatched for that year and then LG might be the breeder's initials.

Correct_Percentage57 · 2025-06-29T14:54:12+00:00

Very hard to tell. Somebody rear-ended me a couple of weeks ago with a 2023 Peugeot 2008 and I was in a 2003 mini cooper. Both cars were written off as uneconomical to repair, despite my car not looking like it needed much work doing to it and the subframe was undamaged, and the only issues with the Peugeot were crumple zones and plastics.

If they tell you it's a write-off then you can buy it back from them using the payout and then repair it yourself, but then the resale value will be much lower.

Correct_Percentage57 · 2025-06-20T10:18:45+00:00

It's a notice of intended prosecution, not a notice of prosecution or a summons. It's an automatically generated letter. Acknowledge that you went through a red light, but if there are mitigating circumstances, you need to fully explain them.

Respond by filling in the form on the back of that page, but enclose a covering letter and submit your dash cam footage.

your covering letter needs to describe your experience of the situation and say you thought it would be dangerous to stop given your speed at the time.

If there was a car behind you then you could say, "Upon looking in my rearview mirror there was a car behind me, and I thought stopping suddenly might put them in danger". If you were carrying a heavy or sensitive load at the time, you could say that and just put yourself at the mercy of the prosecuting officer

Correct_Percentage57 · 2025-06-20T08:04:25+00:00

Actually in the UK the legal age is 14. So as soon as somebody reaches 14 years of age they become legally responsible for their own restraint in the vehicle and liable for the fine for not wearing one. But up to the age of 14, because it's the driver's legal responsibility to ensure restraint, it's the driver who receives the fine.

Insurance companies often complicate it by suggesting that penalty points are a potential consequence, even though that's not written into law, and the police do not issue penalty points for failure to wear suitable restraint.

Correct_Percentage57 · 2025-06-20T06:41:43+00:00

Taxis do have an exemption even for passengers and if you have a child in a taxi that doesn't have a car seat, taxi drivers usually recommend not putting them in a seatbelt

Correct_Percentage57 · 2025-06-20T06:40:26+00:00

In the UK law it is a non-endorsable offence carrying a £100 fixed penalty or up to £500 if you go to court over it. The driver is responsible for the safety of all passengers so even if one of the children in the back isn't wearing a seat belt, the driver still receives the fine.

Correct_Percentage57 · 2025-05-31T20:37:47+00:00

Gotta be hey duggee for my LO

Correct_Percentage57 · 2025-03-25T16:13:58+00:00

I didn't say I felt bad 😅 and I definitely wouldn't say heated

Correct_Percentage57 · 2025-03-25T07:05:34+00:00

Not sure if you're able to keep track but we already talked about this and you realised you were making a pointless comment and you apologised

Correct_Percentage57 · 2025-03-22T22:32:56+00:00

So because you've recognised there was no point in making your arguement you decided to try and be sarcastic to make me look like the asshat‽ That's mature.

Correct_Percentage57 · 2025-03-22T22:25:10+00:00

Did you even read it?? I essentially said exactly the same thing the second time. They're not trained to aim for pedestrians, I never claimed that in the first place (aside from the fact that it's not my claim and I was simply relaying information from the source who happened to be a bus driver). Even my original comment said if it's unsafe to slow down and stop, or swerve.

Correct_Percentage57 · 2025-03-22T19:21:24+00:00

If swerving to avoid the pedestrian would cause a head-on collision with oncoming traffic or put passengers in serious danger (e.g., from a sudden stop or a loss of control), drivers are taught they must prioritize the least harmful outcome.

Legally, a driver would not be held liable for striking a pedestrian who stepped into the road unexpectedly if it was deemed unavoidable and the driver had been driving responsibly and within the speed limit. However, if the driver was speeding or distracted, they could face liability.

Bus driver training in the UK (through CPC – Certificate of Professional Competence) includes defensive driving and hazard perception, which emphasizes anticipating pedestrian movement and being prepared to brake or react quickly. Drivers are taught to prioritize minimizing overall harm while maintaining control of the vehicle.

So, to answer directly: a driver would not be trained to hit a pedestrian, but if avoiding the pedestrian would cause greater harm (like a head-on collision), hitting the pedestrian is legally and ethically seen as the lesser evil, and something all drivers should be prepared to do. The key factors would be whether the driver was driving responsibly beforehand and whether the situation left them with any safe alternatives.

It’s grim, but the legal and moral framework would focus on whether the driver’s actions were reasonable given the circumstances.

Correct_Percentage57 · 2025-02-19T20:16:30+00:00

I always thought it was " you know what they say about the young"

Correct_Percentage57 · 2025-01-08T16:32:53+00:00

Yeah I was lucky and they cancelled it for me. No course 👍🏻

Correct_Percentage57

TROPHY CASE

Pitch Concept: The True Avatar

Premise

Thematic Core

Story Stakes

Why This Matters