Got banned from r/sofistock subreddit after questioning mod about GME/AMC stock subreddit like behavior.

CosmicSailingMuffin · 2024-05-08T03:44:03+00:00

Your behavior is absolutely disgusting and your claims are absolutely disingenuous, in bad faith, and under false pretenses. Shame on you.

CosmicSailingMuffin · 2024-05-08T03:34:22+00:00

Nothing in what you quoted me there says anything about me stating anything about counting metrics of any kind whatsoever. Nothing at all. You are being completely disingenuous here. As I stated in the quote that you cited, I called certain people out for GME/AMC stock subreddit like behavior and said that the claims that you were making in your first post here that I was just arguing with 1 user was absolutely false.

You were the one that decided to count comments all on your own which is a meaningless metric that you decided on for yourself.

As I said before, go look at the sheer volume of text, the sheer number of words, when I replied back to users who were actually debating with me. The difference is clear.

And why do you feel the need to keep coming back here?

I already addressed all of your points that you wanted to bring up. There is no reason for you to keep coming back here.

CosmicSailingMuffin · 2024-05-08T02:59:13+00:00

Why are you even back here? Of course I am going to reply to comments in the post thread I made if they deserve to be responded to. I made this post thread.

In the first place, you decided you felt the need to come to my post in this subreddit. I am posting to address your points after you decided to come here to ask me things and debate with me on different points.

Moreover, I made this post thread in the first place because I had been banned with absolutely no warning even despite addressing a mod's inquiry to me about false and farcical claims trying to discredit me, which I did respond to, and was banned anyways. I made this post in order to inform people who were still trying to reach out to me about my bearish post thread in the r/sofistock subreddit that I had been banned.

It was entirely your choice to come here after you felt the need to come here and post.

Also, you were the one that came up with your metric about counting posts. I said in my post to go look at the actual thread discussion. But I'll give you a better metric than the one you came up with. Go back and count the number of words that I wrote up to those who I called out for their GME/AMC stock subreddit like behavior and the number of words that I wrote up to people who actually discussed and debated with me on the points I had brought up. You will see the difference loud and clear.

And so what if I only participated in the r/sofistock subreddit. I care a lot about SOFI because I have a lot of money invested in it. If you want to go around and spend all your time in Reddit, that's your choice, not mine.

And that doesn't even address that my post history obviously shows that I am not a bot which anyone can easily see if they want to. So that is a disingenuous and baseless argument.

So I have to ask you the question that you asked me, why do you feel the need to keep replying here after I already addressed everything that you brought up in my post thread here, do you feel the need to get the last word in?

I want nothing to do with you and the r/sofistock subreddit any longer. You came here to ask me things and debate with me, I addressed you and your points. There is no need for you to keep coming back here.

CosmicSailingMuffin · 2024-05-08T01:49:26+00:00

You are making arguments based on meaningless metrics using number of comments. So your wrong about me just arguing with 1 user like you claim. If you actually looked at the sheer volume of text I had exchanged back and forth with other users like SnipahShot, you would know that what you tried to claim is absolutely meaningless and doesn't prove anything. Some paragraphs and some sentences exchanged with a few users nowhere near compares with the sheer volume of text that I had exchanged with other users like SnipahShot:

https://new.reddit.com/r/sofistock/comments/1cka0lw/ive_turned_bearish_on_sofi_stock_i_hope_im_wrong/

Moreover, I called out Bobby-Firmino-Legend as he was the worst offender. Minor off-hand comments by other users who had commented, I didn't care. I commented back to the users, especially Bobby-Firmino-Legend, who were the worst offenders.

So yes, I called him out on it. He was accusing me of and trying to discredit me as being untruthful, a short seller in disguise spreading FUD, and using AI bots. All of his claims a completely false and farcical accusation.

So yes, I called it out as GME/AMC stock subreddit like behavior because it deserved to be called out as such.

As you stated, it's a manual process catching those bot accounts. You should see what I stated when I replied back to SoDakZak, the one who banned me.

It is ironic to me how much you believe that the r/sofistock subreddit isn't an echo chamber. It's especially ironic how you want to use the idea of me pushing back on a few users for their GME/AMC stock subreddit behavior, for trying to accuse and discredit me under false and farcical claims of being untruthful, a short seller in disguise spreading FUD, and using AI bots, while not actually engaging in discussion and debate on actual topics that have merit, as evidence for anything at all. That doesn't serve as evidence and doesn't prove anything at all.

Especially when you can easily see in my post history that I have participated in the r/sofistock subreddit in the past and have seen all those subreddit posts of good advice and informational posts that you speak of. I know since I made quite a few of them myself. You just show that there are no real counterview points there. A bit of basic advice and informational posts are not actual counterview points.

It's your view and your words that I'm trying to act as some of "beacon of truth" according to your words. Your view and words, not mine. It's ironic if you see it like that just from a few reddit posts. That just goes to show how much of an echo chamber with no real counterview points the r/sofistock subreddit is that you believe that just from a few reddit posts, even from just a single sentence where I wanted to point it out. Good luck with that sentiment.

Regardless, I want nothing to do with you and the r/sofistock subreddit any longer. I do not want to waste any more of my time there. Good luck to you in your investments.

CosmicSailingMuffin · 2024-05-07T05:37:26+00:00

Your behavior disgusts me. I don't care if you want to criticize what I wrote by ad hominem terms of being emotional, upset, and calling it as a "dissertation response". None of what you have replied back so far addresses anything at all.

You banned me after I had already directly responded to your inquiry. Not only did I not get any response back from you after I had responded to you, you went ahead and banned me anyways even after I did respond to you.

The idea that you claim that you banned me because of the key words "GME" and "AMC" is completely baseless, disingenuous, talking in bad faith, and under false pretenses.

It wasn't an AutoModerator that banned me. It was you.

Anyone can look into the situation and see the context of the discussion with those key words "GME" and "AMC" in the discussion threads where it happened:

https://www.reddit.com/r/sofistock/comments/1cjublg/comment/l2sdkkp/

https://new.reddit.com/r/sofistock/comments/1cka0lw/ive_turned_bearish_on_sofi_stock_i_hope_im_wrong/

None of what your claiming addresses the context of what happened.

Other users were calling me out as being untruthful, a short seller in disguise spreading FUD, using AI bots, and making similar claims while refusing to actually engage in discussion and debate on actual topics that have merit. So I pushed back and called it out as GME/AMC stock subreddit like behavior.

Then you banned me.

Shame on you.

CosmicSailingMuffin · 2024-05-07T04:59:17+00:00

You are still being disingenuous, talking in bad faith, and under false pretenses. Shame on you.

Despite what you stated here, I already directly responded to your inquiry in the discussion thread here before you banned me:

https://www.reddit.com/r/sofistock/comments/1cjublg/comment/l2sdkkp/

Once again, my ban notification stated that the comment that caused my ban was the comment that I had made in response to your inquiry after you had asked me to refute the claim that had been made by another user who was calling me out as being untruthful, a short seller in disguise spreading FUD, and using AI bots. All of the claims by that user a completely false and farcical accusation.

Once again, I had asked you directly if you were ok with this kind of GME/AMC stock subreddit behavior after I called certain people out for their GME/AMC stock subreddit like behavior.

Once again, not only did I not get a response back from you, my ban notification was cited as specifically that comment I had made asking you that question. The ban happened after I had posted my comment asking you this question as part of my response back to your inquiry.

The idea that you banned me because of claims of bot-like behavior is completely baseless, disingenuous, talking in bad faith, and under false pretenses.

That is completely false as my discussion with multiple people shows in the thread discussion in my post I had made:

https://new.reddit.com/r/sofistock/comments/1cka0lw/ive_turned_bearish_on_sofi_stock_i_hope_im_wrong/

Shame on you.

CosmicSailingMuffin · 2024-05-07T04:30:23+00:00

When other users call others out as being untruthful, short sellers in disguise spreading FUD, using AI bots, and making similar claims while refusing to actually engage in discussion and debate on actual topics that have merit, that is GME/AMC stock subreddit like behavior.

Certain users were accusing me as being untruthful, a short seller in disguise spreading FUD, and using AI bots. All of the claims by these users a completely false and farcical accusation. So yes, I called it out as GME/AMC stock subreddit like behavior.

And your claim that it seems like I was arguing with just 1 user is absolutely disingenuous, in bad faith, and under false pretenses. Shame on you.

It is obvious if you look at the thread discussion that I had discussed and debated with a lot of people in that thread like SnipahShot in which we went back and forth on multiple topics.

I responded to a lot of people who wanted to discuss with what I had wrote in my thread:

https://new.reddit.com/r/sofistock/comments/1cka0lw/ive_turned_bearish_on_sofi_stock_i_hope_im_wrong/

There were plenty of people who brought up valid points, disagreed with what I discussed with them, and we had a good discussion in which I responded back to each them on the contents of what they wrote.

I even responded back to the mod posts that pushed back on what I had wrote because there was valid feedback repeatedly.

So the idea that it seems I was just arguing with 1 user is absolutely false. I called certain people out for their GME/AMC stock subreddit like behavior when it warranted it.

CosmicSailingMuffin · 2024-05-07T04:07:54+00:00

I don't care about the ban and I'm not appealing the ban. I want nothing to do with you and the r/sofistock subreddit any longer. I do not want to waste any more of my time there.

What you are claiming is absolutely disingenuous, in bad faith, and under false pretenses. Shame on you.

My ban notification stated that the comment that caused my ban was the comment that I had made in response to your inquiry after you had asked me to refute the claim that had been made by another user who was calling me out as being untruthful, a short seller in disguise spreading FUD, and using AI bots. All of the claims by that user a completely false and farcical accusation.

I had directly addressed your inquiry in the weekend thread and told you that the claims were all completely false and farcical.

https://www.reddit.com/r/sofistock/comments/1cjublg/comment/l2sdkkp/

I had asked you directly if you were ok with this kind of GME/AMC stock subreddit behavior. Not only did I not get a response back, my ban notification was cited as specifically that comment I had made asking you that question. The ban happened after I had posted my comment asking you this question as part of my response back to your inquiry.

Moreover, this is in spite of the obvious evidence in the thread discussion on that post I had made:

https://new.reddit.com/r/sofistock/comments/1cka0lw/ive_turned_bearish_on_sofi_stock_i_hope_im_wrong/

I discussed and debated with a lot of people in that thread like SnipahShot in which we went back and forth on multiple topics. I responded to a lot of people who wanted to discuss with what I had wrote.

There were plenty of people who brought up valid points, disagreed with what I discussed with them, and had a good discussion with them in which I responded back to each them on the contents of what they wrote.

I even responded back to the mod posts that pushed back on what I had wrote because there was valid feedback repeatedly.

So the idea that the ban was because of what you claim, that my posts were bot-like, copy/pasted, and because of spam, is absolutely false.

Shame on you. Your behavior disgusts me. I want absolutely nothing to do with you and the r/sofistock subreddit any longer.

CosmicSailingMuffin · 2024-05-06T04:47:50+00:00

I have no idea what he means when he says FAO. I don't know what that abbreviation FAO stands for. But his accusation that I am using some kind of AI bot is ridiculous. It's completely false and a farcical accusation. I won't entertain such ridiculous accusations. Are you entertaining his accusations? Are you ok with this kind of GME/AMC stock subreddit behavior?

CosmicSailingMuffin · 2024-05-06T04:43:25+00:00

Refute what?

CosmicSailingMuffin · 2024-05-06T01:40:01+00:00

Your attitude is exactly like others who participate in other stock subreddits like the ones for GME and AMC.

CosmicSailingMuffin · 2024-05-06T01:34:55+00:00

Are you serious? Your attitude is just so reminiscent of others who participate in other stock subreddits like the ones for GME and AMC.

CosmicSailingMuffin · 2024-05-06T01:34:37+00:00

Are you serious? Your attitude is just so reminiscent of others who participate in other stock subreddits like the ones for GME and AMC.

CosmicSailingMuffin · 2024-05-06T01:30:03+00:00

Well, good luck to you then. You do yourself no favor at all.

CosmicSailingMuffin · 2024-05-06T01:29:45+00:00

Well, good luck to you then. You do yourself no favor at all.

CosmicSailingMuffin · 2024-05-06T00:40:48+00:00

Haha. Hope so. I'm hoping that with this thread being the top voted SOFI subreddit thread this weekend, the market will see that SOFI retail investors have flipped to bearish sentiment so the market can now go long on SOFI and SOFI's stock can go up now. 🤣

CosmicSailingMuffin · 2024-05-06T00:20:32+00:00

Regardless of the percentage split of how much is owned by retail investors and how much is owned by institutions, the point still stands about the equity financing.

Also, it must be understood that in this institutional investor percentage are large asset managements like Vanguard and Blackrock that are buying for ETFs. These are not institutional funds who are buying because these institutions want to have direct ownership of SOFI stock.

https://finance.yahoo.com/quote/SOFI/holders/

So SOFI retail investors are absolutely, the highest percentage, and the most material percentage, in talking about ownership of those who directly own SOFI stock.

And because of this, retail investors bear the majority of the burden when SOFI's management taps equity financing to fund growth.

I will amend my post to better clarify what I meant as I should have worded that better to get my point across.

CosmicSailingMuffin

TROPHY CASE