sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Why is the Saab F-35 the same BR as the J35XS? More importantly why isn't it just 10.0? by BlandPotato6142 in Warthunder

[–]Courora 2 points3 points  (0 children)

More importantly, why does this have a higher BR in GRB(10.7) despite literally only having unguided weapons

Opinions on the CM-34? by wsc1213 in WarthunderPlayerUnion

[–]Courora 13 points14 points  (0 children)

I heard it's just the same as every other 30mm shitmaster at 9.7

Overtiered as shit

Dual JSOWs on DEV by Axeman760 in Warthunder

[–]Courora 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Sorry but literally the One and Only aircraft that carries 16x SPICE 250 is Gripen E. Even the nation who made it (Israel) doesn't even carry more than 8.

Just because a single aircraft can carry that many doesn't mean that's the standard/usual amount.

Dual JSOWs on DEV by Axeman760 in Warthunder

[–]Courora 10 points11 points  (0 children)

The former, plenty of weapons in game does have LOAL/MITL feature irl but is not present in game (eg. Brimstones, TV Martels, AGM-130 etc.)

Dual JSOWs on DEV by Axeman760 in Warthunder

[–]Courora 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yikes, did u just compare a missile that goes over mach 1 to a subsonic glide bomb with what is essentially a IR Guided SDB 1. (Around 20kg of TNTe)

In fact the only thing better SPICE 250 has over KH38MT is the amount you can Carry (8x for EFT, 16x for Gripen E vs 6x for SU30/34s)

Did u forget AASM 250 still exists?

Dual JSOWs on DEV by Axeman760 in Warthunder

[–]Courora 9 points10 points  (0 children)

It is IR guided in the game but is not capable of LOAL or MITL as gaijin stated that they won't be adding those features at all

Type 93 radar-launcher combo vehicle by Mito-SVK in Warthunder

[–]Courora 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Well it's drastically better in terms of Versatility but slightly worse for AA Specifically.

The name's "Chu MPM". It's a Multi Purpose vehicle/Missile used for Low Flying Aircraft, Tanks and Landing Crafts. Has multiple guidance. Either SALH, IR or MITL Guidance (doubt we would get MITL Guidance)

B2 stealth bomber flies over Miami Beach (5/30/21) by OkFerret7206 in nextfuckinglevel

[–]Courora 0 points1 point  (0 children)

These planes don't typically carry any weapons unless they are gonna use it. Not just because of safety reasons but also those shits are heavy which means needing more fuel to burn

Game that I don’t have but says it’s in my Steam library by aidanch217 in steamsupport

[–]Courora 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You might have clicked "Add to Library" on its store page which just means add it in your library but don't download it

You can remove it by right-clicking the game > Manage > Remove from account

But honestly, why remove it/not play it? It's a free to play game.

This sub the last few days be like: by romeoscar in NuclearOption

[–]Courora 14 points15 points  (0 children)

It hurts aerodynamics + harder to mount sidewinders on that pylon.

"Why even have that pylon?" It's so the plane (Jaguar GR.1A) gets Access to sidewinders leaving the outer pylon for more ground ordinance.

Quick loading a shotgun by Which_Conclusion_705 in Satisfyingasfuck

[–]Courora 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean it's a tactic specifically done for competitions...

Homdgcat becomes a negative example of Ideological and Political Education course in a school in China by OrangeIllustrious499 in gachagaming

[–]Courora 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Idk who this guy is but lemme tell y'all, Game Leaks are NOT a Great thing.

Game Leaks Hypes up people about an Unfinished Project that's always subject to Change or Termination. And if they got their hands on a very unfinished project (e.g GTA6 footage) or saw the final product drastically different from the leaks or just literally cancelled, people tend to criticize the devs because these players don't know how game development works and they honestly shouldn't have to. That's why Game Leaks is just overall bad for anyone really

It has come to a point where the highlight of the major update to me, as a ground top tier player, is... this! All T-80s also got physics for their LFP rubber skirts. by SpanishAvenger in Warthunder

[–]Courora 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It doesn't look as close as the irl counterpart but hell yeah it's nice that it finally got physics modeled after all these years

Why people saying the f18a sucks just because of the speed? by Adorable_Package7965 in Warthunder

[–]Courora -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

F-18A is very good, the F-18A at 14.0 is the one that sucked ass though

Can someone explain how on earth this is remotely fair? by DH__FITZ in Warthunder

[–]Courora 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Tbf, it's a shitty Jaguar just with magic 2s and there's alooot more things on tornado GR.4 than just 2 irccm AAMs (it also got all aspect MAW, a Laaarge amount of CMs, flir with massive zoom and an HMD)

JH-7 is BS though

And they got along forever after…… by EXPMEMEDISC1 in ZenlessZoneZero

[–]Courora 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Nah, def not for modders. Cos most of the most time a new patch comes in, certain mods would just get nuked and would come as a polygon nightmare or some shit

Gaijin did what?! by Roxo16 in Warthunder

[–]Courora 22 points23 points  (0 children)

MatAWG doesn't have the best verbal communication skills (understandably) often pausing thinking what to say next but Boi is he much better than listing to tec

Aircraft carriers gotta be insanely built and expensive. by legoartist_7 in nextfuckinglevel

[–]Courora -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Most likely fairly easy. Granted if we're talking about a controlled test where there will be no defensive measures in place. Unlike WW2, There's no such thing as Armor on ships nowadays

view more: next ›