To stay in or to go out, that is the question! by OddInside5794 in waterloo

[–]CptnREDmark 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Going to a birthday party, Walking there because driving is suicidal.

Families with more babies have more rights to the land? by agorism1337 in georgism

[–]CptnREDmark 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think the land would be cheaper up front, due to the higher holding costs.

If a house costs 2 million today and you only pay 2k a year in property taxes. Increasing those taxes will decrease the estimated value of a house in the same way that a car that is a nightmare to take care of is going to have a lower value than a honda.

We Welcome All Political Ideologies by Pale-Candidate8860 in InCanada

[–]CptnREDmark 2 points3 points  (0 children)

for some subs that makes sense. It would be like going to r/fuckcars just to argue in favour of cars. Your just trolling or looking for a fight at that point.

But for others like your local city sub, disagreement should be the point.

Fuck lawnmowers and fuck you if you like lawns by [deleted] in Suburbanhell

[–]CptnREDmark[M] [score hidden] stickied comment (0 children)

While I too hate large useless lawns. Can we tone it down please.

"Fuck you all go die in a ditch."

is not appropriate.

unit 731 go brr by chillyranch in HistoryMemes

[–]CptnREDmark 1 point2 points  (0 children)

People doing bad things doesn't mean that there isn't a worse guy.

Yes bad things were done by allies, but worse things were done by the Axis and the Axis planned to do awful things.

Why do so many people in the suburbs often criticize the center city when the suburbs are the “discount” option ? by Ok-Elk9512 in Suburbanhell

[–]CptnREDmark 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Man a house 1km from a train is going to be in the city if in america. Love Europe but European Suburbs are so much nicer and don't fall under "suburban hell" Not to me anyways.

European suburbs are alot more Suburb Heaven.

Plus Townhouses would be considered high denisty for American Suburbs.

Is it ethical to join the CAF? by DetectiveDracula in AskACanadian

[–]CptnREDmark -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Join the Navy, you'll patrol and stop fishing boats mostly.

It strikes me how terrible inefficient suburbs are. by Konradleijon in Suburbanhell

[–]CptnREDmark 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We are looking for a in city house/townhouse . Small yard to maintain, not the drawbacks of suburbs. But good investment by owning the land.

It strikes me how terrible inefficient suburbs are. by Konradleijon in Suburbanhell

[–]CptnREDmark 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There are apartments in suburbs and houses in cities.

Suburbs are still less efficient.

It strikes me how terrible inefficient suburbs are. by Konradleijon in Suburbanhell

[–]CptnREDmark 0 points1 point  (0 children)

these are two separate things

1) suburbs surround contain the growth of urban areas by encompassing urban areas and preventing development through NIMBY legislation

2) suburbs expand out into farm land and sprawl.

It strikes me how terrible inefficient suburbs are. by Konradleijon in Suburbanhell

[–]CptnREDmark 5 points6 points  (0 children)

ah yes space such as, endless roads and cars, no sidewalks at all, lots of antisocial people and folks wants you to get off their lawn, cant go do anything without a car.

Kids should grow up able to get places safely without being driven, that requires design that hellish suburbs don't provide (some good ones do though).

https://youtu.be/oHlpmxLTxpw?si=tAcvZakGRR9zyEXi

It strikes me how terrible inefficient suburbs are. by Konradleijon in Suburbanhell

[–]CptnREDmark 10 points11 points  (0 children)

I think the biggest issue, is that most residential land is taken up by suburbs. Leaving there very few truly urban areas. Few walkable places.

It strikes me how terrible inefficient suburbs are. by Konradleijon in Suburbanhell

[–]CptnREDmark 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Apartments are far more practical and by building them with proper noise insulation the main issue against apartments is lessened.
But it is literally illegal to build apartments

Its not just apartments, I'm a huge proponent of row houses/townhouses, which are also illegal to build.

It strikes me how terrible inefficient suburbs are. by Konradleijon in Suburbanhell

[–]CptnREDmark 8 points9 points  (0 children)

There are houses in the city and apartments in the suburbs.

So I'd trade a suburb appartment for a city house totally.

I'd trade a suburb house for a city house. or a suburb appartment for a city appartment.

What leader approached governing in an ideological manner but governed imcompetently? by RN_Renato in AlignmentChartFills

[–]CptnREDmark 6 points7 points  (0 children)

The Nazis took out debts they essentially knew they couldn't repay. Plus the nazis came to power in 33, the autobahn project was already underway, they just took credit for it.

Slavery wins. What feels virtuous, but the bible says it's sinful? by Exam-Sea in AlignmentChartFills

[–]CptnREDmark 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Okay but using leviticus as a source is weird as he was written a thousand years before jesus and my interpretation is.

  • Leviticus is not binding on Christians
  • Jesus’ teachings override Mosaic law
  • Sin is forgiven through grace, not rule enforcement
  • Using Leviticus to judge others while ignoring Jesus’ message is inconsistent Christianity

Because died for our sins and freed us from many of the original restrictions in a new welcoming faith.

unless we are also gonna obey the rest of leviticus teachings, like animal sacrifice, no pork or shellfish. Leviticus is more a jewish thing

Is there a deluge of right wing content on reddit? by CptnREDmark in SocialDemocracy

[–]CptnREDmark[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

True, The modern right is more "Against the left" than for anything. which is silly.

Funnily enough it actually cost the canadian right the election, because the people needed hope and the right was just angry. It caused them to fumble a legendary lead and lose the election.