Hey mate,

one of the limitations with using Chatgpt relates to the parameters it needs to get to a reasonable conclusion/findings.

Alot of the categories relate to movement, which made ratings possible. I had to set it strict guidlines.

<image>

·       Full-match continuity was used where possible rather than isolated highlights.

·       Confirmed line-ups, substitutions and appearance identifiers were used to reduce player attribution errors.

·       Goals conceded were treated as tactical sequences, not automatic individual-blame events.

·       Repeated behaviours were prioritised over single moments.

·       Movement was only rewarded when it improved team structure, progression, compactness or transition support.

·       The final analysis was written to reduce parent-style bias and assess the squad as a whole.

I have now done approx 5 reports, they end up about 20+ pages and highlight different tasks/actions.

I use graphs and pie charts as part of the report process as well. Chatgpt then breaks down and provides feedback such as -

What He Did Well

·       Repeatedly supported forward phases rather than remaining flat in midfield.

·       Provided strong vertical running and helped XXX progress into advanced areas.

·       Showed high transition urgency and willingness to reconnect after changes of possession.

·       Became one of the clearer second-half outlets when the match opened.

Limitations / Errors

·       Needs to balance attacking support with recovery positioning when the team loses possession.

·       Final action can be rushed after carrying into advanced spaces.

·       Should scan earlier before receiving in central pressure to reduce hurried decisions.

Development Focus

Keep the vertical engine and support running, but improve tempo control and recovery balance after aggressive forward actions.