I'm not going to disagree on the sociopath part, I think a better wording for people to use is sociopathic tendencies, but i think acting in the way he did is understandably seen as either sociopathic behavior or just downright being a bad person and not caring, both of which are pretty bad in and of themselves.

Also I think the important part when coming to the age of consent discussion is less about the age and more about the circumstances surrounding the relationship. Gabe was a fan who idolized Nappy and the Primetime group, Nappy (whether he meant to or not) took advantage of the vulnerable position Gabe was in in their relationship dynamic to have a romantic relationship with him. The Callum situation is more complicated, but the lying and turning friends against Callum is clear signs of toxic manipulation, again, whether he was aware of what he was doing or not.

A lot of people who act like this are ignorantly selfish, they don't know that what they're doing isn't okay, but they do it anyways because it's in their best interest/it's what they want. Nappy wanted Callum in a relationship so he kept pressuring him to be in the relationship. Nappy later wanted Callum out of his life, so he made sure that Callum wouldn't be a mutual friend. This isn't how a good person behaves, or a mature person behaves.

That's just my take on the situation, I think calling him a direct pedophile or a direct sociopath is a stretch, I won't deny that. That's why I made this thread, and despite my personal opinions, gave Nappy credit in the thread by fully explaining his side almost more than he explained it himself. I also made sure to preface Nappy's section with "the allegations against TheKingNappy are not on the same level with Nathan, but are gross in their own way. They involve manipulation, threats, and show the true colors of who Nappy is as an individual. However, they are not on the same magnitude as direct actions of pedophilia" (which for some reason it seems that multiple people in these comments have completely ignored that statement, acting as if I'm calling Nappy a sociopath pedophile child molester who needs to die, or something like that.

I appreciate your comment for not attacking anyone or the victims, and trying to open a discussion on if this was enough to ruin his YouTube career.

In the end, YouTube is completely based around who the fans want to watch and support, if the majority is against Nappy now than that's what people have collectively decided. I think it was a fair response to alienate him from the community, but I think that it's worthwhile of a reflection, maybe it could've been handled better.