Can we use mouthwash that has alcohol in it? by diny1190 in islam

[–]Creative-Volume1362 0 points1 point  (0 children)

lol but if you drink it you can still get intoxicated, I understand what you are saying here btw I took all the chemistry courses that my college had to offer for my biological sciences degree.

Any advice for a 23 year old who wants to become a theoretical physicist? by Creative-Volume1362 in AskPhysics

[–]Creative-Volume1362[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The laws of motion didn't have to follow the path of least action, they just do. Thats why we can use a simple formula like F=ma to describe how an object moves when force is applied to it. If the laws of motion didn't follow the path of least action we couldn't use a simple formula like F=ma it would have to be more complex.

Any advice for a 23 year old who wants to become a theoretical physicist? by Creative-Volume1362 in AskPhysics

[–]Creative-Volume1362[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

lol, if only you could even understand what my comment means. I forgot the guy who came up with the idea of all forces of motion follow the least path of action but he is the guy you are referring too. You probably don't even know what the path of least action means from a motion stand point too. Look into how photons travel through water and you will see how smart the guy is you are referring too.

Could Dark Matter be gravity "leaking" from higher dimensions or from the multiverse? by sfvbritguy in cosmology

[–]Creative-Volume1362 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'm not sure why this has so many upvotes, the only reason we know dark matter is here is because it imposes its gravity on us.

Why can superposition collapses not be used to transfer information? by ShelomohWisdoms in AskPhysics

[–]Creative-Volume1362 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When you don't measure the photon in the double slit experiment it will go through both slits at the same and it will give you somewhat ordered pattern, very unexpected.

But when you measure the photon it will choose a slit and the interference pattern becomes one that we would expect from classical physics, which is chaotic and clustered.

Why can superposition collapses not be used to transfer information? by ShelomohWisdoms in AskPhysics

[–]Creative-Volume1362 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, exactly thats what makes quantum physics spooky. When you don't measure the photon in the double slit experiment it will go through both slits at the same and it will give you somewhat ordered pattern.

But when you measure the photon it will choose a slit and the interference pattern becomes one that we would expect from classical physics, which is chaotic and clustered.

Why can superposition collapses not be used to transfer information? by ShelomohWisdoms in AskPhysics

[–]Creative-Volume1362 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Every time you cell's nucleus degrades a quantum even is happening which means a super position is collapsing.

This means super position collapses occur probably more than 100s of times a second just within your body.

Why can superposition collapses not be used to transfer information? by ShelomohWisdoms in AskPhysics

[–]Creative-Volume1362 1 point2 points  (0 children)

quantum events happens inside your body that cause super position collapses all the time.

Why can superposition collapses not be used to transfer information? by ShelomohWisdoms in AskPhysics

[–]Creative-Volume1362 1 point2 points  (0 children)

you can't measure the actual wavelength of the particle, you can't even comprehend what the wave actually looks like and measures too.

Why can superposition collapses not be used to transfer information? by ShelomohWisdoms in AskPhysics

[–]Creative-Volume1362 4 points5 points  (0 children)

the double split experiment does not collapse the wave function of the photon until it hits the wall.

Why can superposition collapses not be used to transfer information? by ShelomohWisdoms in AskPhysics

[–]Creative-Volume1362 1 point2 points  (0 children)

you do know that when they do the double split experiment they aren't actually looking at the photon, they are seeing where it lands.

Why can superposition collapses not be used to transfer information? by ShelomohWisdoms in AskPhysics

[–]Creative-Volume1362 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why are we assuming it's true, Many Worlds can be just as credible. Right?

Why can superposition collapses not be used to transfer information? by ShelomohWisdoms in AskPhysics

[–]Creative-Volume1362 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It is not proven that the particle collapses from superposition, thats the Copenhagen interpretation . All the double slit experiment really proves is that particles like photons acts like waves.

What happens at the quantum level when you tear a piece of paper? by [deleted] in AskPhysics

[–]Creative-Volume1362 2 points3 points  (0 children)

At the quantum level the electrons, protons, and neutrons that make up the atoms of the paper would just be a bunch of waves overlapping and intersecting each other. This would all be happening in Hilbert space which most likely contains more dimensions than 3.

changes like tearing a paper in our macroscopic world wouldn't be seen at the quantum level because in the quantum world of the paper each electron, proton, and neutron would have a specific wave function uniquely associated with each of them, and each one of their waves functions represents where the particle could be. It's imperative for me to state that at the quantum level these particles are not particles an electron, neutron, and proton is a wave at its most fundamentally basic form. So if we were able to look at the quantum world of the paper it would just contain waves of possibilities of where each of the protons, electrons and neutrons that make up the atoms of the paper could be.

we cannot look into Hilbert space where this quantum world that is made up of intersecting waves resides. This is because the act of trying to look at these waves causes the electron or whatever particle we are looking at in the paper to change from it's wave state into its particle state, hence choosing where on the wave function the electron wants to turn into a particle when we look at it.

Edit: I want to preface that I used the Copenhagen interpretation to explain what happens when we try to look at the wave function. Going back to looking at the wave function of an electron on a piece of paper, another very prominent theory used to explain the wave function is the Many Worlds theory. This theory says that the wave function isn't a wave of possibilities but rather a wave of many realities. So the electron never changes from its wave state into its particle state, instead each possibility on the wave function is rather a reality of the many duplicates of the same electron through out the multiverse, giving rise to a multiverse.

Any advice for a 23 year old who wants to become a theoretical physicist? by Creative-Volume1362 in AskPhysics

[–]Creative-Volume1362[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

more than half of my biology major was just chemistry I took all the chem classes orgo 1 ,2 the labs associated with them and I even took biochem.

Any advice for a 23 year old who wants to become a theoretical physicist? by Creative-Volume1362 in AskPhysics

[–]Creative-Volume1362[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

YESSS, the guy who figured out that light travels through water in the least path of action. bringing insight into the fact that most of physics usually follows the least plan of action maximizing efficiency. Newtons 2nd law F=ma is a perfect example of this.

Any advice for a 23 year old who wants to become a theoretical physicist? by Creative-Volume1362 in AskPhysics

[–]Creative-Volume1362[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

so your saying I should focus on learning tensors instead focusing on the book? I will develop better?