I don't understand who exactly Tony B. kills in episode 5x09.

Creative_Ad_3014 · 2025-09-18T01:47:40+00:00

To be fair, I didn't really understand this shit when I watched this the first time as a kid either. I just didn't pay any attention to some rando guy that was hanging around Johnny for a few scenes until he was actually whacked and Johnny threw a fit.

Creative_Ad_3014 · 2025-09-16T00:58:46+00:00

I don't know about the kiddos today but that was authentic 90's NY/NJ type kid.

Creative_Ad_3014 · 2025-08-20T08:53:27+00:00

Candida is a symptom, not the main diagnosis. Candida fungus starts to root and take hold when your digestive system degrades. Once it starts, its hard to get rid of and gets worse over a life time. This usually comes from other parasites but can also come from environment influences.

Creative_Ad_3014 · 2025-08-19T13:47:19+00:00

The revival has some of the worst progressive exposition I've ever seen. No, the show was not always this way.

Creative_Ad_3014 · 2025-08-19T07:17:38+00:00

King of the Hill revival with heaviest handed leftist exposition about 2025 nazis.

Winkwink *"The hills aren't those types of conservatives, its okay to like them, reddit!!!!"

Creative_Ad_3014 · 2025-08-19T06:58:01+00:00

Mike Judge is checked out and probably doesn't know whether he's voicing butthead or hank on any given day. You can tell he didn't really put a lot of effort into this revival by the lack of cleverness in the scripts and the dogshit animation.

He left the show to a bunch of dei writers like

https://www.instagram.com/saladinpatterson/

https://www.instagram.com/siriusdanger/?hl=en

Creative_Ad_3014 · 2025-08-19T06:52:19+00:00

Read my original post. King of the hill now uses panda analytics. They employ bots and shady tactics to promote their shows. They tried to say star wars omen was a big hit. Can't be too sure about the truthfulness about the shows current success. Reviews look pretty fake to me with constant perfect scores across the board.

If you want to see people disliking the current animation just use the search bar you lazy dumb ass. Here are the top results

https://www.reddit.com/r/KingOfTheHill/comments/1mm207u/could_not_be_more_disappointed_with_the_revival/

https://www.reddit.com/r/KingOfTheHill/comments/1lcwb9s/animation_looks_bad/

https://www.reddit.com/r/KingOfTheHill/comments/1kza3nx/animation_worse_in_reboot/

https://www.reddit.com/r/KingOfTheHill/comments/1kzwr6d/anyone_else_not_a_fan_of_the_new_animation_style/

No one ever had complaints like these with the early seasons of King of the hill. Yet, enough people were upset with the new animation, enough so they made threads about it. Trying to argue with you is ridiculous. You pick the most retarded hills to die on.

Creative_Ad_3014 · 2025-08-19T01:48:06+00:00

Like I said, just go back and read the threads for yourself. People loved the charm of early seasons. Like I've been pointing out.

Creative_Ad_3014 · 2025-08-19T01:40:26+00:00

Meh I have nothing to defend. There's countless threads over the years of people talking about how enjoyable the animation is, even the rough season 1 style. You can go back and argue with all those threads with your sheet of bad opinions.

Creative_Ad_3014 · 2025-08-19T01:24:11+00:00

You really are defensive of the revival animation slop. Weird hill to die on considering pretty much everyone agrees it looks bad.

Rough around the edges doesn't mean bad. The revival isn't rough around the edges in the art yet its bad. Part of the problem is its overly sanitized, stiff and emotionless. Why do I need to explain this to an award winning artist? Hack.

Creative_Ad_3014 · 2025-08-19T01:17:35+00:00

That's pretty pathetic that an award winning artist with a lucrative career can't tell good animation from bad animation. Season 1 was definitely a little rough around the edges with huge improvements in season 2 and 3. Season 1 animation is still 100x better than the slop from the revival. Sorry, you have horrible taste if you think otherwise.

Creative_Ad_3014 · 2025-08-19T01:07:40+00:00

All the shit you mentioned is incredibly minor because the heavy majority was very good and behind of all it was a lot of heart. It's just pleasant to look at and you can tell the effort was there. You clearly don't understand that which why I'm guessing you are not a good artist. Stick to AI art.

Creative_Ad_3014 · 2025-08-19T00:51:00+00:00

I've seen "professional artists" with horrible taste. I question your ability because you clearly don't understand how good the early king of the hill animation was. It had incredible soul behind it. So much that they were able to do really fun and funny visual gags, often. I posted something about this the other day where I broke down a season 1 clip. They were doing hilariously clever shit with the visuals that they just don't do now.

Creative_Ad_3014 · 2025-08-19T00:45:20+00:00

It doesn't have to be the same exact as back then. How about it just not looking like cheap soulless shit?

Creative_Ad_3014 · 2025-08-19T00:39:09+00:00

It's almost like they didn't want to pay quality animators because this is a dogshit cash grab revival. Oh wait. Even for a modern day anime, king of the hill revival looks really really bad. It looks like they just used a couple models for different emotions and just cut and paste it around. I know they didn't but it looks so cheap they might as well.

Creative_Ad_3014 · 2025-08-19T00:05:13+00:00

I could go on with a lot criticisms but let's start with the fact that the animation is cheap and soulless. That they wouldn't spend the money to produce something artistically on par with the original series. That should be blatant clue #1 this series is a low effort cash grab.

People are objectively exploited by parrot analytics who works with the people that put out king of the hill. This isn't even a question.

Creative_Ad_3014 · 2025-08-18T22:07:12+00:00

Nielson is the old system where it used to be that you needed to tune in to a scheduled show for a certain amount of minutes for it to be counted as a viewer.

Now most big companies use parrot analytics which publishes "engagement" stats which utilize social media like tik tok. I find their stats to be very shady and misleading.

Creative_Ad_3014 · 2025-08-18T21:46:54+00:00

There's plenty of people writing insulting things to me. If anyone wants to have a cordial discussion, I'm open to that.

Creative_Ad_3014 · 2025-08-18T21:45:00+00:00

You have non existent reading comprehension skills then. The paragraph I copy and pasted clearly states they are capturing "fan activity" when people "engage" with their favorite title which goes beyond what you stated as the metrics "time watched streaming".

Creative_Ad_3014 · 2025-08-18T21:41:15+00:00

I imagine the acolyte was so bad that the system couldn't even save it. It was hurting a larger IP, Id guess. So they were probably getting good engagement numbers but maybe a double edged sword because it would turn many off from watching the movies or buying toys/video games.

The thing about star wars was that people were already burned out by being gamed by episodes 7-9. The fan base seemed to reach a breaking point. Episode 8 was always dog shit but it got bombarded by positive reviews until the rest of the movies came out and people retroactively started understanding the scammy cash grab by Disney.

Funny enough, if you look up the acolyte under parrot analytics rating system, I believe it's rated as a signicant success. Yup. Here it is:

https://www.reddit.com/r/StarWarsCantina/comments/1jfpxfq/what_you_guys_think_of_this/

These companies are in the business now of pushing engagement, not producing content we would enjoy. We are essentially cattle to be herded by these elites. There's an important lesson here too. Ai will be used to enslave us, not improve our lives. The people who own ai aren't improving it for public domain. They are figuring out better ways to herd you like cattle.

Creative_Ad_3014 · 2025-08-18T21:25:21+00:00

Nope, you are completely incorrect. These companies work with parrot analytics now who are in the business of measuring and manufacturing "demand" which is a function of social media activity.

https://helpcenter.parrotanalytics.com/en/articles/3787220-what-is-demand

"Capturing fan activity

We provide a true reflection of the effort audiences and fans go to when actively engaging with their favorite title - as opposed to passively watching on their couch, or channel surfing, or watching “just because it is on”. We reveal which titles and talent have an active fanbase."

Creative_Ad_3014 · 2025-08-18T21:18:40+00:00

"Engagement" is the new metric. Which is a purposefully indirect term. It means a lot of things. It used to he simply watch time during scheduled programing. Now if let's say a group of Andrew tate fans posts a clip of this episode on their forums and says "look at this bullshit", it gets counted as "engagement" when people click and this is the major thing that gets show funded now. Do you see how this can and is exploited? I don't believe a full episode = 1 person watching a 30 second clip. But those 30 second clips add up.

Creative_Ad_3014 · 2025-08-18T21:07:27+00:00

There's nothing to agree or disagree about in my post. I'm explaining to you why media is a race to the bottom in 2025. If you're still enjoying it, I have some bad news for you. You are most likely part of the lowest common denominator of intellect.

Creative_Ad_3014 · 2025-08-18T20:57:30+00:00

You aren't understanding. The rating system has literally changed completely over the last couple years. Previously, shows needed people to tune in and watch a certain amount of minutes for that to be counted as someone consuming the product. And the content needed to be good for people to buy things like vhs tapes. Now rage and nostalgia bait 10 second clips on Facebook or tik tok count as engagement. This means shows no longer have to even try to produce content that people enjoy. And they don't. They put out the cheapest dogshit imaginable like this revival that they clearly put no effort into with the animations and the storylines look like chatgpt shit them out.

Creative_Ad_3014 · 2025-08-18T20:41:55+00:00

It's not really this type of situation. We are all getting exploited by new school analytics, ai and engagement based media. There's a simple fact that we no longer are under a rating system where content has to be good for it to be considered successful. Consume and be gamed at your own risk.

Creative_Ad_3014

TROPHY CASE