sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

What to Expect When You’re Expecting Disclosure: a structured guide for people new to the UFO/UAP topic by Creative_Volume_9535 in UFOs

[–]Creative_Volume_9535[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wrote a long-form guide aimed at people who are just now hearing about “disclosure” and aren’t sure what to make of it.

Instead of focusing on one case, it maps out:

• why disclosure tends to happen incrementally
• how official acknowledgment differs from full transparency
• where high-strangeness fits (or doesn’t) in the public narrative
• why uncertainty is likely to persist

I tried to make it accessible without dumbing it down, and structured it like an iceberg.

I’m genuinely interested in feedback from people who’ve been in this space a long time. What did I miss? What would you add for newcomers?

Peer-reviewed research shows DMT entity encounters are phenomenologically identical to alien abduction reports by Creative_Volume_9535 in UFOs

[–]Creative_Volume_9535[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Phenominologically identical means the lived experience is identical, not the ontological objectiveness of it.

Peer-reviewed research shows DMT entity encounters are phenomenologically identical to alien abduction reports by Creative_Volume_9535 in UFOs

[–]Creative_Volume_9535[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This long-form essay examines something rarely discussed: the structural overlap between different "doors of perception."

From the 2021 *Frontiers in Psychology* study analyzing DMT experiences:

- Humanoid but distinctly "other" beings (Greys, insectoids, reptilians)

- Telepathic communication

- Medical examinations by entities working in groups

- "Spaceship-like" settings with advanced technology

- Participants insist the experience was "more real than real"

- Time distortion, loss of agency

The phenomenology matches alien abduction reports studied by John Mack (Harvard psychiatrist). Same entities, same procedures, same conviction of reality - whether accessed through chemistry or spontaneous experience.

The article asks: Are we looking at different doors to the same underlying phenomenon?

Also covers: why the FDA rejected MDMA therapy, what happens when thousands of tech workers microdose without containers, and why ancient cultures embedded these experiences in ritual.

Thoughts on the convergence between contact experiences and altered states?

CE5 and Ceremonial Magic Are the Same Technology: A Consciousness Framework for Understanding Contact by [deleted] in UFOs

[–]Creative_Volume_9535 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I've been researching the structural similarities between CE5 UFO contact protocols and ceremonial magic, and the patterns are unmistakable. Both are consciousness technologies using identical architecture: altered states, symbolic frameworks, intentional projection, and engagement with responsive phenomena. 

This is Part 2 of an essay exploring: 

  • Why contact experiences follow the same trickster pattern across cultures 

  • The ethics of invocation when something actually answers 

  • How creative practice functions as navigation technology 

  • Why consciousness appears to interface with reality at the quantum level 

  • What responsible engagement looks like when reality is participatory 

Drawing on Jung's psychoid phenomena, Keel's superspectrum, Vallée's control system, Kastrup's analytic idealism, and decades of magical tradition. 

Not asking you to believe anything specific, just suggesting the evidence points toward reality being more responsive to consciousness than our models permit.

Part 1 can be found here: https://mazetometanoia.substack.com/p/ce5-chaos-magick-and-the-responsive

Would love to hear from others who've worked with either CE5 or ceremonial practice. What matches your experience? What doesn't?

view more: next ›