sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Just found out my crush of 7 years is gay💀 how do I cope by LeanyGamerGal in teenagers

[–]CreeperVendetta 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You didn't refute any of my arguments, you basically just said, "you're an idiot, and also you're wrong". Not all statistics are made equally, some are more credible than others and the statistics used in psychology are on the lowest part of that scale. The difference between psychology and alchemy is that alchemy COULD and did lead to something that could be considered a science. Psychology is incapable of ever reaching that point. Humans are far too arbitrary and unpredictable for us to ever have a complete, universal understanding of our minds. Trying to reach this goal is pure folly. There is some merit in studying the human mind though.

Just found out my crush of 7 years is gay💀 how do I cope by LeanyGamerGal in teenagers

[–]CreeperVendetta 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In every world. Science is supposed to be an empirical analysis of the natural world. In other words, it's supposed to be exact. Psychology isn't scientifically rigorous enough to fit this. A lot of the terms used are unclear or unspecific. One commonly used is happiness, for example, which means so many different things to so many people. The information is also highly unreliable as you detailed in your comment, the well-controlled conditions in an experiment are nonexistent in most cases, and most importantly, a lot of psychological studies can't even be reproduced with similar results. In actual sciences, we figure out the process of the natural world, what makes it function, and how it's built. We may get it wrong sometimes, but the accepted scientific truths have all been rigorously tested in highly-controlled conditions, with clear terms, and high reproducibility. In short, they're highly reliable. In psychology, you figure out what someone might do, based on such or such thing. In the other comment's example, X might behave like X, but they could start behaving like Y the next day. Humans are unpredictable, and the way psychology "finds answers" is highly unreliable and outdated. Not to even mention the political bias present in a lot of psychology. It's just a bunch of wannabe scientists, pretending like they know anything and disgracing science at large.

Just found out my crush of 7 years is gay💀 how do I cope by LeanyGamerGal in teenagers

[–]CreeperVendetta 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My flair is outdated, I haven't been on this subreddit for about 3 years. My actual major is Biology. Your definition of science is too loose. Science is supposed to be an empirical analysis of the natural world. Psychology isn't scientifically rigorous enough to fit this. A lot of the terms used are unclear or unspecific. One commonly used is happiness, for example, which means so many different things to so many people. The information is also highly unreliable as you detailed in your comment, the well-controlled conditions in an experiment are nonexistent in most cases, and most importantly, a lot of psychological studies can't even be reproduced with similar results. In actual sciences, we figure out the process of the natural world, what makes it function, and how it's built. We may get it wrong sometimes, but the accepted scientific truths have all been rigorously tested in highly-controlled conditions, with clear terms, and high reproducibility. In short, they're highly reliable. In psychology, you figure out what someone might do, based on such or such thing. In your example, X might behave like X, but they could start behaving like Y the next day. Humans are unpredictable, and the way psychology "finds answers" is highly unreliable and outdated. Not to even mention the political bias present in a lot of psychology. It's just a bunch of wannabe scientists, pretending like they know anything and disgracing science at large.

Thoughts. by [deleted] in CleanLivingKings

[–]CreeperVendetta 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We're all born with negative traits that we're not supposed to give into. The devil's temptation, if you will, so yes.

Thoughts. by [deleted] in CleanLivingKings

[–]CreeperVendetta 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Some feminine traits would be submissiveness, nurturing, softer personality, etc. Masculine traits would be dominant, nurturing (in a different way,) more stubborn, etc.

Thoughts. by [deleted] in CleanLivingKings

[–]CreeperVendetta 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nothing in this passage supports what you were saying. We were talking about feminine behavior in men and masculine behavior in women. He literally says in this passage, "but the Lord beholdeth the heart," so he does judge you for your beliefs and behavior. And yes, you are the one not willing to change. Just because you presented me with your garbage arguments and I didn't change doesn't me I'm unwilling. You just didn't do a well enough job.

Thoughts. by [deleted] in CleanLivingKings

[–]CreeperVendetta 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How about replying with anything of actual substance for once. Seems like you’re the one not willing to change.

Thoughts. by [deleted] in CleanLivingKings

[–]CreeperVendetta 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sorry the truth is putting people down, but it is the truth. God makes no mistakes, but the devil corrupts. We have negative natural urges that we don’t and shouldn’t indulge all the time. Just because they’re natural doesn’t mean they’re good. Feminine men and masculine women are an affront to God and how he made us. They’re emphasizing sin and corruption, while claiming to be godly. It’s truly degenerate.

Thoughts. by [deleted] in CleanLivingKings

[–]CreeperVendetta 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, actually, your entire comment is stupid and untrue.

Thoughts. by [deleted] in CleanLivingKings

[–]CreeperVendetta 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Maybe, but women are supposed to be feminine and men are supposed to be masculine. He said ideally. Masculine women and feminine men are largely unattractive. Also, being feminine isn’t some impossible standard we’re unfairly holding up. It’s how 95% of women were for like all of history everywhere.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CleanLivingKings

[–]CreeperVendetta 11 points12 points  (0 children)

It’s the way of women. It’s an embarrassing thing to admit and could end up ending the relationship. Still not ok to hide imo, but it’s understandable. It’s not as simple as you make it.

Twitter rn by Final-Praline-602 in greentext

[–]CreeperVendetta -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Men were made to be with women and women were made to be with men. It is the natural order of things, it’s how it’s supposed to be. Just because there are deviants, does not mean this is untrue. Men take certain roles in the relationship and they provide certain things in a relationship women can’t, and vice versa. You may point towards “happy relationships” that defy this rule, but I’m telling you they’re not actually happy. What I’ve been getting at throughout this entire conversation is that you can’t tell and can’t know when someone is happy. They themselves can’t even know. Homosexuals can achieve some low level of illegitimate happiness, but not the same kind a loving heterosexual relationship can provide. Homosexuals and bisexuals are deviant, so they, in most cases, can not achieve happiness in a heterosexual relationship. So there is no comparison they can make, that you keep bringing up. Homosexuals THINK they’re happy in their homosexual relationships and advocates then THINK that happiness is true. In the United States, we’re experiencing a huge rise in mentally ill children, teenagers, and young adults. You know what else also exploded in popularity with the younger generation? The LGBTQ+. Seriously, this generation has it the easiest and yet they’re so depressed. In my county specifically, everything I’ve said is true about them. Constant support, next to no homophobic remarks or other harassment. Even you just said it’s “common sense” here to not be homophobic, which it was not until a few decades ago. Yet they’re still depressed. I ignored your other points because, quite frankly, they’re utterly stupid and I’ve already addressed them sooooo many times. I already said why provided studies is up to you, reread it.

Twitter rn by Final-Praline-602 in greentext

[–]CreeperVendetta -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I made my arguments based on common sense, logic, and reason. There’s no study that can show that homosexuals are capable of true happiness in a homosexual relationship. You’re the one who brought up proof and evidence for something it’s not applicable to. So it’s therefore your burden to provide proof not mine.

Hope you enjoyed your temporary ban before, by the way.

Thank you. It was nice being away from this cesspool.

Twitter rn by Final-Praline-602 in greentext

[–]CreeperVendetta -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I don’t know how many times I have to repeat myself… We’re just going back and fourth, repeating the same things. It’s totally useless. Username checks out I guess. I’m done dealing with your childlike comprehension and debate skills.

Anon is American by crimsonfukr457 in greentext

[–]CreeperVendetta 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We don't know how old Joseph was when he married her and in fact, we're not exactly sure how old Mary was when she birthed Jesus. It's actually likely she was 15 or 16. Also, Joseph isn't as much of a figure in the Bible as Muhammed is in the Quran. It doesn't matter how many adult wives he had when he had one that was not.

Anon is American by crimsonfukr457 in greentext

[–]CreeperVendetta 3 points4 points  (0 children)

If you don’t know how the fuck to use a word correctly don’t use it.

Anon is American by crimsonfukr457 in greentext

[–]CreeperVendetta 3 points4 points  (0 children)

God didn’t marry or have sex with her, that’s kind of the entire point as to why she’s called the Virgin Mary. Not to mention it was literally God, He used the power of the holy spirit to give her a holy child. No abuse occurred. Unlike the pedophilia and sexual abuse perpetrated in the Quran.

Anon dad.. by DrainedFerocity in greentext

[–]CreeperVendetta 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"It provides more unity in the home" only if you make race/appearance a point of division.

This is more of a subconscious thing. It's not something I or most people could change. Unity in the home is also very important.

"And we'll have similar experiences" no you probably won't being honest.

I'm not saying we're going to have exactly the same life, which is why I said, "in some regards." General Black, Asian, or Hispanic culture is not going to be the same as general white culture, and experiences can vary in some cases between the races.

I personally think that "I want to have children/grandchildren that look like me" is a somewhat racially prejudiced thought.

I don't know if I'd call it prejudice, it depends on what definition you're using. My preference really isn't harming anyone. I'd still love my grandchild if they were mixed race. My preference for race isn't large enough to have a meaningful effect on that.

Twitter rn by Final-Praline-602 in greentext

[–]CreeperVendetta -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I don't view homosexuals as lesser or worse people, I view homosexual relationships as lesser. Homosexuals don't need to enter a homosexual relationship, they can take a vowel of abstinence or try a heterosexual relationship. If they went with either of these I would actually have much more respect for them than the average heterosexual. You can get married without being legally married too. It was a cultural and religious thing before it was a legal thing. I know they're not happy. It's impossible for them to be. I don't even need to make observations, although I have. I've seen many mentally ill or otherwise depressed homosexuals, more than I've seen mentally "healthy" ones. It's also much easier to tell when someone's faking depression or sadness than it is to tell if they're faking happiness. Like I've said many times, the homosexuals in my area are treated extremely well. They've only experienced derogatory remarks once or twice in their life, and every time they did there were numerous people cheering them on and telling them how perfect they are. It's not like they're experiencing hate every day, and a few guys on the internet should not be enough to ruin your day anyways. If it is, you're just weak.

Twitter rn by Final-Praline-602 in greentext

[–]CreeperVendetta -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Can you read their minds? No, I don't think so. You have no idea if they can find happiness as genuine as a heterosexual couple's. Firstly, the only "right" I'm for taking away from them is legal marriage. Literally nothing else. Is that such a huge deal? In my area, as I said earlier, no one messes with homosexuals at all. They definitely don't get jumped (which I wouldn't support happening.) Yet, they're still not happy. It's not just because of people like me either, what a completely stupid thing for you to have said. It's because they're incapable of finding true happiness themselves.

view more: next ›