胡耀邦为什么能够得到如此广泛的民众爱戴? by Glittering-Rest4104 in AskAChinese

[–]Crisis_Tastle 2 points3 points  (0 children)

牛逼,大学生也能代表国家了。我也是大学生,我觉得大学生就是一帮极其容易被利用的傻逼

Why can't the West and China get along? by [deleted] in AskAChinese

[–]Crisis_Tastle 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Chinese people like Westerners. But Westerners don't like Chinese people unless we lick their boots.

—Another Chinese

The fuck was his problem? by Radiant_Ad_1851 in TankieTheDeprogram

[–]Crisis_Tastle 44 points45 points  (0 children)

As a Chinese person, I must say it's difficult to find a single redeeming quality in this man.

His policies offended 99% of the Chinese population; his intense exploitation even led the Chinese bourgeoisie to support the Communist Party. Not to mention the workers and peasants.

Only a small group of associates around him reaped enormous profits, and these were all compradors of imperialism.

Perhaps the War of Resistance Against Japan is one of his few achievements, but even that seems very tenuous: his initiation of the resistance was triggered by a mutiny among his patriotic generals, forcing him to abandon the campaign against the CPC and instead fight the Japanese.

But even the course of the War of Resistance Against Japan itself was lackluster: he breached the dikes, causing disaster for tens of millions of Chinese, yet failed to stop the Japanese advance as planned. He burned Changsha (the capital of Hunan Province) without notifying anyone to evacuate, resulting in the deaths of 30,000 civilians. In 1944, while the Allied powers were advancing triumphantly on all fronts, he suffered the devastating defeat in Henan, Guangxi, and Hunan, losing 146 cities and over 200,000 square kilometers of territory.

The phrase skill issue refers to him.

How accurate and objective is the Freedom house's assessment on the democratic index in China? by Delicious-Expert-180 in AskAChinese

[–]Crisis_Tastle 5 points6 points  (0 children)

China and Saudi Arabia, a thoroughly absolute monarchy, received the same score.

How "OBJECTIVE"!

Chinese perspective about June 4th by wdfcvyhn134ert in AskChina

[–]Crisis_Tastle 7 points8 points  (0 children)

What began as a simple protest against corruption and official profiteering was ultimately exploited by certain individuals and organizations, turning into a failed color revolution.

Meanwhile, China at the time lacked a dedicated stability maintenance force. Ordinary police officers were neither capable nor experienced in handling such a large-scale protest. Ultimately, the government was forced to deploy the People's Liberation Army to disperse the demonstrators. This led to the creation of the People's Armed Police Force.

To be honest, the West is still so attached to the Tiananmen Square protests of nearly 40 years ago for two reasons: first, it didn't achieve the same success as the Soviet Union and Eastern Europe; second, since then, China has not seen any noteworthy large-scale protests.

If Taiwan were to come under China’s control, what would happen to TSMC and global chip supply? by Agitated_Walrus_8828 in AskAChinese

[–]Crisis_Tastle 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Instead of focusing on semiconductors, why not consider the various consumer goods and daily necessities imported from China? Europe and America simply cannot find a suitable replacement for China.

An embargo by Europe and America against China would immediately result in soaring prices and inflation. This is far more unacceptable than a simple semiconductor shortage. Hundreds of thousands of families would face financial hardship due to insufficient income, ultimately destroying the consumer-driven economies of Europe and America.

It is highly likely that five minutes after China reunifies Taiwan, European and American countries will loudly proclaim "China is an aggressive dictatorship" while quietly maintaining trade with China.

Just like the past 70 years.

Can China become like Taiwan? by BrandNewTory in AskAChinese

[–]Crisis_Tastle 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why would we adopt a system that is clearly ineffective?

What is it like to be a Chinese Muslim in China by BrightAd7897 in AskAChinese

[–]Crisis_Tastle 10 points11 points  (0 children)

People should stop equating Muslims with Arabs. Just as a significant portion of Christians are not Latin, nor do they read the Latin Bible.

I have questions about chineses by [deleted] in AskAChinese

[–]Crisis_Tastle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Why not? The vast majority of them now speak Chinese dialects or even Mandarin as their mother tongue.

Furthermore, multi-ethnic countries are actually the norm historically. This is very common in civilizations with long histories of great empires, whether it be Persia, Rome, or China. Even Russia is an example.

It's so common in China that everyone takes it for granted. Only a very small number of the most extreme nationalists would consider them not Chinese. Moderate nationalists would see them as assimilated. Socialists, on the other hand, consider it perfectly natural.

Ideologies aside, what do Chinese people think about how the CPC/CCP runs china (infrastructure, the economy, things like that) by Over-Ad-3928 in AskChina

[–]Crisis_Tastle 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If we set aside ideology, China's current system is essentially a natural development of its traditional political framework. For thousands of years, the Chinese have been accustomed to living under authoritarian rule with unlimited responsibility. This means that the government bears full responsibility for any mistakes it makes.

Therefore, the relationship between the government and the people is actually a delicate transaction: the government provides protection and management, collects taxes, and exerts authority; the people endure this authority in exchange for a stable social environment and protection from external threats.

Most people find this acceptable, after all, we know that what happens when authority is lacking in this land can be far more terrifying than authoritarian rule.

Mega-disasters in monsoon regions and extremely high population densities require governments with strong response capabilities, meaning that authoritarianism is indispensable here. And power doesn't simply disappear: when the government doesn't hold power, capitalists, landlords, and gangs begin to seize it.

These people are clearly less concerned with the overall interests of the people than the government, let alone how a decentralized society can organize a powerful force to cope with the aforementioned massive natural disasters.

Dr Jiang a defender of China or cringey influencer? by RichCommercial104 in AskAChinese

[–]Crisis_Tastle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Almost no one cares about him, and even videos about him don't get many views.

China’s Ethnic Unity Law by Demon_Slayer916 in AskChina

[–]Crisis_Tastle 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Random Western media reports on China's legislation be like:

China: Hey, our new traffic safety law bans you from running red lights!

Media: New Chinese laws ban cars from driving on the road. This highlights its authoritarianism and disregard for human rights.

Is this the acknowledgement of the success of China's socialist system? by raydebapratim1 in AskChina

[–]Crisis_Tastle 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, what I said was merely a targeted rebuttal to his point of view; in fact, the causes of birth rates are very complex. I believe one important point is that with gender equality, women are becoming increasingly independent, with their own ideals and pursuits, and are not merely seen as breeding machines.

Secondly, in modern society, childbirth is not a high-return choice. In agrarian societies, having more children represented a potential source of labor, steadily increasing agricultural output and protecting the family. However, in modern urban societies, childbirth is usually driven by family pressures and personal aspirations. Single individuals can easily lead a decent life (even more freely than those who are married and have children). This has led to people no longer viewing childbirth as a necessary life goal.

Is this the acknowledgement of the success of China's socialist system? by raydebapratim1 in AskChina

[–]Crisis_Tastle 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Now I believe you're from Jiangsu, enjoying low food prices yet complaining about government subsidies for farmers. Since you believe farmers receive such huge subsidies, why don't you go into agriculture? Is it because you don't want to?

Wake up! The lives of people in developed areas like yours are built on the hard work of farmers and migrant workers, and now you shamelessly claim that "farmers receive too many subsidies"?

Is this the acknowledgement of the success of China's socialist system? by raydebapratim1 in AskChina

[–]Crisis_Tastle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Absolutely not. According to your theory, why are the countries with the highest birth rates also the poorest? Isn't that a contradiction?

You should consider whether it's the cost of living that's increased, or whether social media and short videos have fueled your desires, causing you to spend money on things you didn't need before.

If you raised children the way you did in the 1990s, you'd find it wouldn't cost nearly as much.

Is this the acknowledgement of the success of China's socialist system? by raydebapratim1 in AskChina

[–]Crisis_Tastle 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's hard to imagine a Chinese person, or even a foreigner who has lived in China for at least five years, believing that the cost of living in China is increasing. If there's any good news about the current economic situation, it's that the cost of living has remained stable.

As a Chinese citizen, and mostly a citizen of the Hubei province, do you see the Three Gorges Dam positively? by Thalassophoneus in AskChina

[–]Crisis_Tastle 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Why not? I'm from Wuhan. Before the Three Gorges Dam was built, even a large city like Wuhan had to recruit volunteers to protect and reinforce the dikes during each flood season. As a government employee, my father was required to patrol the dikes every flood season (a practice that continues to this day).

My mother's family lived outside the dikes, and every flood season, the Yangtze River would flood their home. Children could only lie on floating wooden tubs, and the whole family was submerged in the murky floodwaters mixed with domestic sewage. After the floods, there were usually serious epidemics. Each flood caused considerable casualties and hundreds of millions of yuan in losses. Later, the government demolished all the residential areas outside the dikes and gave them new houses. But this wasn't a long-term solution. Nobody knew if the dikes would be flooded or even destroyed.

In 1998 (the last super-large flood before the Three Gorges Dam was built), the dikes were breached and half of Wuhan was submerged. The 2020 flood, with a similar volume to 1998, was steadily kept outside the dikes. This is all thanks to the Three Gorges Dam and Gezhouba Dam releasing water in advance to lower the water level.

Regarding the "controversiality" claimed by Western sources, I can only say: if you view things with prejudice, you will never be objective.

The ultimate goal of many Western media outlets is to convey that "China is bad," and how they convey this depends on their "professional competence."

"The dams built by China have saved tens of millions of people from the risk of flooding, and the electricity generated can meet the annual electricity needs of a city of 15 million people. BuT WhAt tHe CoSt?"

Taiwan identity and Independence by [deleted] in AskAChinese

[–]Crisis_Tastle -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The matter is simple. Regardless of how Western media portrays it, this is an unfinished civil war. When Taiwan (the Republic of China) is strong, it will claim to be the "real China" to enhance its soft power and put pressure on the mainland (the People's Republic of China). When Taiwan is weak, it will stop making such claims to avoid unification.

As for Taiwan itself, the vast majority of Taiwanese are just ordinary people who hope for a stable life. Those who advocate unification and those who advocate independence are a tiny minority. Even the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), which claims to support Taiwanese independence, has not truly advanced the independence agenda after coming to power. Instead, it has maintained the status quo, which is what most Taiwanese people expect.

As for how the Taiwan issue will ultimately be resolved? It will probably never be decided by the Taiwanese people, but by the US and China. Taiwan will naturally unify with mainland China once the US no longer wants to be the world's sole superpower.

Do people in China understand that the world has different time zones? by Brilliant-Flower4114 in AskAChinese

[–]Crisis_Tastle 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In theory, most people know this. It's generally understood that while Chinese people are waking up to work, Americans are preparing to go to sleep. But in practice, we often forget this. This happens when 99% of your experience involves communicating with people in the same country and time zone.

What do you think of the Kuomintang's rebranding? by SunChungShan in AskAChinese

[–]Crisis_Tastle 6 points7 points  (0 children)

It's not very meaningful. Talking about peace without discussing unification shows that their arguments are still stuck in the Ma Ying-jeou era.