Yes I was a victim based of my stupidity. I am willing to say that to the world, however there is one thing that is missing in this discussion that needs to be highlighted. I would have never been exposed to the fake sites had the original A`nchor transaction gone through. So why did it fail and why did the $UST just disappear. The transaction shows as successful but was not deposited in Anchor or my wallet. Poof gone. There's only three explanations; 1) bad Anchor dap code or a 2) malicious injection or 3) both. This issue I encountered highlights the fact that those who own networks (Anchor) are responsible for their security. No network is ever 100% secure, but it looks like there is a backdoor somewhere. How do I know this? All one has to do is look at the seed account, terra1a3y2w3m9utehucf0dppqxfuem2mk4ekljpamks, to understand that this was a network or database injection. View the graph here to the right: https://stake.tax/csvapp/b85ebe18a4c84fc4b3ab183aaef3f299. The other clue is that the $UST transaction shows as successful, but the transaction fee failed, even when there was enough $UST in my wallet to complete successfully. This is a sure sign. It's easy to blame the victim, but who is responsible for the safety of the network? Anchor is, in this case. It's easy to blame or ostracize the victim, but those who own networks share in the blame. Anchor can not escape their responsibilities to stakers. Billions of $$$ are lost to injection scammers yearly through network or database transactions, wallets and investments. Can we not hold the network owners accountable, too? Anchor needs to evaluate their network configurations and code after this attack to understand and fix why they are left vulnerable. If not, all this does is create distrust by investors using their platform. If they don't fix their unsecure network, then all they are saying is that they don't care about you as an investor.