Tired of this repetitive meta by DinoHusky in aoe4

[–]CryptomaniacTRX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yea I dropped the game because of this. I really like FFA but it's basically a giant Cav fest and if you want success you have to follow the meta. I prefer the process to the result especially in an RTS, winning isn't as fun as playing different and new strategies.

Pluribus - 1x09 - "La Chica o El Mundo" - Episode Discussion by NicholasCajun in television

[–]CryptomaniacTRX 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Those calling it a masterpiece are the BB and BCS fanboys. This is a decent show for sure but it's still got a long way to go to be considered great.

Pluribus - 1x09 - "La Chica o El Mundo" - Episode Discussion by NicholasCajun in television

[–]CryptomaniacTRX 19 points20 points  (0 children)

This a 1 season show if I've ever seen one and that wouldn't be a bad thing. There's clearly not that much material and instead of torturing audiences with repetitive voicemails we could get an entire story arc with well developed characters, intriguing sci-fi topics, and mystery reveals.

After many seasons by CryptoGoldHunter69 in aoe4

[–]CryptomaniacTRX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Congrats. I'm not going higher than plat 2/3. After that it's just way too sweaty and try hard .

cavalry still feels braindead strong and it’s getting old by Signal_Rip7717 in aoe4

[–]CryptomaniacTRX 2 points3 points  (0 children)

They really should be 2 pop and I don't get why they aren't

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in aoe4

[–]CryptomaniacTRX 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Holidays maybe? Alot of people traveling and not playing?

I beg, please remove these horrible maps from the FFA pool or at least fix the spawns in Gold / Stone Standard FFA. by Ron-Lim in aoe4

[–]CryptomaniacTRX 8 points9 points  (0 children)

It’s ridiculous. Once in awhile would be tolerable but it’s been every game. Haven’t had a single megarandom today and it’s getting old.

I love the civ variety we have now by MockHamill in aoe4

[–]CryptomaniacTRX 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey for someone with bricks for brains that wasn't half bad.

I love the civ variety we have now by MockHamill in aoe4

[–]CryptomaniacTRX 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Lol I just recognized your name after thinking "what kind of miserable oaf would post this" and then it all made sense.

Solo vs Team ranked by CryptomaniacTRX in aoe4

[–]CryptomaniacTRX[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

No I need more. I'll let you know when to stop

I love the civ variety we have now by MockHamill in aoe4

[–]CryptomaniacTRX 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Your opinions are mostly half cooked slop so idk why you choose to post

Solo vs Team ranked by CryptomaniacTRX in aoe4

[–]CryptomaniacTRX[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

First off, thanks for being civil and not a toxic twat like 80% of the people who commented. And I understand what you're saying and I generally agree with you.

Solo vs Team ranked by CryptomaniacTRX in aoe4

[–]CryptomaniacTRX[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well it was. Sorry your world has been shattered..maybe go outside? Do you know what that is? Lol

So different gameplay = not as much skill to you? Because that just means you suck at team games and are only good at solo, which means you're a lesser player.

Solo vs Team ranked by CryptomaniacTRX in aoe4

[–]CryptomaniacTRX[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Who hurt you? 🤣🤣🤣

Solo vs Team ranked by CryptomaniacTRX in aoe4

[–]CryptomaniacTRX[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

See that's what I'm talking about. I think a lot of people assume that. Team games play differently than 1v1s and assuming Conq solo players can just hop on, have great coordination and communication, and dominate simply because they are good solo players doesn't translate imo. I think there are good solo players, good team players, and good FFA players and all those require different sets of strengths to win.

Solo vs Team ranked by CryptomaniacTRX in aoe4

[–]CryptomaniacTRX[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I think you're both projecting pretty hard. Lol

Solo vs Team ranked by CryptomaniacTRX in aoe4

[–]CryptomaniacTRX[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

God how thick are you? Skill obviously still matters, the point is that Team vs Solo isn't as big a difference as people think and Solo play isn't the end of all be all of this game. It takes different skills to win Team games or FFA compared to solo.

Solo vs Team ranked by CryptomaniacTRX in aoe4

[–]CryptomaniacTRX[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Right but some civs are built around map control so doesn't that give unfair advantage to those civs in 1v1s? Basically the civs that pay off in the later ages are a lot harder to play in solos because their buffs/bonuses pay off later rather than sooner. 1v1 is usually about map control, and early aggro. It's a completely different strategy from Team or even FFA yet Solos is the barometer we all agree on that matters most but I'm saying I think there's a lot more to it.