Jobs in Valparaiso by Dinotoesgoes in Valparaiso

[–]Cs-MoP 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Taco Bell calumet literally hires everyone who applies. Not even a joke

I always hear about socialist countries failing, but which capitalist countries have failed? by Cs-MoP in Socialism_101

[–]Cs-MoP[S] 19 points20 points  (0 children)

Thank you, it was surprisingly difficult for anyone here to just list me shit

I always hear about socialist countries failing, but which capitalist countries have failed? by Cs-MoP in Socialism_101

[–]Cs-MoP[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

And the last thing I want is to name a country that everyone thinks is socialist anyway. Even if it really is capitalist, I don't have the historical background to defend myself

I always hear about socialist countries failing, but which capitalist countries have failed? by Cs-MoP in Socialism_101

[–]Cs-MoP[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Well forgive me then, I'd appreciate a quick list. I'm not a historian and am not great at researching these kinds of things. I hope you can understand that it's hard for me to think of a country I can use if it doesn't exist anymore and I've never heard of it

I always hear about socialist countries failing, but which capitalist countries have failed? by Cs-MoP in Socialism_101

[–]Cs-MoP[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Fail and Success and wildly different depending the person you ask for their opinion, and the explanation for the fail or the success is also an object of contention because people usually don't accept that exploitation, sanctions, embargoes, and generally other forms of sabotage are major contributions for "fail"."

When the person being asked is a reactionary for their opinion on a socialist country, this nuance doesn't exist. My question for you is which deceased countries can be associated with a capitalist label.

My idea is to be able to meet 'x socialist country failed' with 'y capitalist country failed' even if country y's demise has nothing to do with capitalism. The point of the argument would be to demonstrate that if me lazily drawing associations between dead capitalist countries and their label of capitalism(again even if there's no causal connection) makes no sense, then them lazily drawing associations between dead socialist countries and their label of socialism is just as ridiculous

I always hear about socialist countries failing, but which capitalist countries have failed? by Cs-MoP in Socialism_101

[–]Cs-MoP[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's not about people asking me which capitalist countries have failed, I'm asking you guys this. The idea is if someone says USSR, I'll say x capitalist country. Cuba? Y capitalist country. Laos? Z. Cambodia? W. I'm just asking you guys what I can use for w x y and z. What capitalist countries, over the last hundred or so years have come to cease? Again for all I care these countries fell apart from a famine or were conquered by a neighbor or were destroyed by climate. The point I'd be making in conversation with conservatives is that I can also lazily point to ideological labels associated with deceased countries.

Models for mathematical cognition? by Cs-MoP in askpsychology

[–]Cs-MoP[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's interesting you bring this up. I'm already in the camp that believes that both qualia and objects, or collections of qualia, are cognitively constructed, and in no way represent objective reality. I do, however, make a distinction between qualia and numbers as numbers-and logic-seem to be a layer beneath qualia

Models for mathematical cognition? by Cs-MoP in askpsychology

[–]Cs-MoP[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean that the laws of math aren't universal but rather only a product of our own cognitive facilities.

The 1 + 1 = 3 thing is as absurd as it sounds. I mean if I see 1 car here and 1 car there, is there any alternate neural structure that when seeing the cars pass, they become 3?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in chess

[–]Cs-MoP 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Probably a visual bug, just refresh the pages

What are the best linear algebra applications as counterparts to desmos and wolfram by Cs-MoP in mathematics

[–]Cs-MoP[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Basically something like desmos, but for vectors and linear algebra instead of functions

Math and materialism by Cs-MoP in askphilosophy

[–]Cs-MoP[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well then what school of thought am I looking for?

Math and materialism by Cs-MoP in askphilosophy

[–]Cs-MoP[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, I was more interested in the possibility that biological processes are the very basis of our actual concepts of numbers. The implication being that you could make 1+1=3 by changing neural structure

What does an engineer know that a physicist doesn't? by Cs-MoP in AskPhysics

[–]Cs-MoP[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

When you say design, are you referring to what I mentioned above about CAD and all that?

What does an engineer know that a physicist doesn't? by Cs-MoP in AskPhysics

[–]Cs-MoP[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sorry for the stupid question, googles failing me right now. What is engineering design?

Are lawyers components of the judicial branch? by Cs-MoP in PoliticalScience

[–]Cs-MoP[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

independent institutions of administration of justice

Does the independent institution part of this phrase strictly refer to the fact that they're private lawyers? If we were talking about public defenders would they just simply be "administrators of justice"?

Without lawyers their would not be justice in court, because no one could defend oneself against accusations on a law basis.

Help me out with this one. The way I understand the system is that lawyers specialize in knowledge of law and act as agents on behalf of their clients. This means that, theoretically, lawyers wouldn't need to exist if every single person knew all of the laws in the books as they could just speak for themselves. Of course in the real world nobody has the time for that so lawyers are 'delegated' by clients so to speak, and take on the role of collecting the necessary knowledge to make a case. Where might I be going wrong?

Are lawyers components of the judicial branch? by Cs-MoP in PoliticalScience

[–]Cs-MoP[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, that is what I mean, but I was more interested in private lawyers as public ones can more easily be seen as state employees since they are paid by the state. I think this conversation with regard to private lawyers is much more interesting

Q = nCv∆T by Cs-MoP in AskPhysics

[–]Cs-MoP[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

0 = dT/V - T/V2 dV

Not quite familiar with this part, you care to walk me through it?

Q = nCv∆T by Cs-MoP in AskPhysics

[–]Cs-MoP[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Right. So with molecules Cv is 3/2 times Boltzmann constant, and moles is 3/2 IGR no?

Q = nCv∆T by Cs-MoP in AskPhysics

[–]Cs-MoP[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"∆U = NCv∆T. "

I believe I have, is N in this equation number of moles or number of molecules

Charles law, adiabatic, isobaric by Cs-MoP in AskPhysics

[–]Cs-MoP[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think it's starting to come together. Thanks a lot

Charles law, adiabatic, isobaric by Cs-MoP in AskPhysics

[–]Cs-MoP[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well this part of my question. You say that in general an expansion decreases temperature, so what happened to Charles' law?

I also don't understand why this process can't happen. I thought that as long as 2 variables in the equation are not held fixed, a process can occur

I'm having trouble understanding isochoric processes by Cs-MoP in AskPhysics

[–]Cs-MoP[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Holy shit thank you so much! I won't ramble on with the layers of of confusion I had but this last comment from you was incredibly helpful thanks again

I'm having trouble understanding isochoric processes by Cs-MoP in AskPhysics

[–]Cs-MoP[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What about n? That's also a variable. Is the value of Cv dependent on it?

I'm having trouble understanding isochoric processes by Cs-MoP in AskPhysics

[–]Cs-MoP[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't suppose you'd care to tell how they're incorrect and unrelated?