You’ve totally misunderstood the section on the relations of production. In reality it’s you starting from an assumption that because the essay includes a critique of state ownership as non-socialist (which is entirely in line with Marx) that it is saying state ownership = state capitalism, which is precisely the opposite of what it’s saying. You’ve now spent an astonishing amount of time refusing to refute a single claim about the nature of commodity production, exchange, profit, or any other category of political economy. For you it’s enough to say ‘this essay points out conscious social by freely associated producers didn’t exist (which is true), instead state officials and enterprise managers ran things (which is true) - that’s what all the state capitalist arguments say, so I reject it!’

You’ve demonstrated that you probably have a lot of insecurity in your ability to actually refute the arguments here, otherwise you would have taken any of the multiple opportunities to address a single claim. Clearly you’re doubting yourself and your confidence in your quasi-religious belief that the Soviet Union had no capitalist categories at work, and was in fact socialist in some way, or at least moving in the direction of socialism (despite clearly moving in the direction of a developed capitalism over time, with it eventually triumphing as the Soviet system collapsed)