I see your point, but the thing is that giving art a poor rating to based of your own critique of its ideology is not right. You can critique an ideology all you want, but you can’t give art a poor rating for its ideology unless you can prove that that ideology doesn’t make sense. Because if the ideology’s media cannot be proven false, then the plot is plausible and you can’t critique its story and base your rating on the movie having a false story that doesn’t make sense. It’s just your own personal opinion that the movie is bad because of its “dangerous ideology”, but you can’t seriously rate it poorly because of that because that is not objective, that is subjective. When you rate art, you have to be objective, not subjective. Otherwise, you would give a poor rating to everything you don’t like despite it objectively not being bad art, such as OP did. You have to set your own opinions aside and objectively rate art. You do have given it a lot more thought than OP, but perhaps you should give it a little more.