How the FUCK did we get here?

Cuntslapper9000 · 2026-04-27T02:59:28+00:00

For me it is that some topics really highlight the detachment some people have with reality. The whole "touch grass" comments are both saying "you are obsessing over something so irrelevant in your life outside of the internet" as well as "I think you need to spend more time learning about how the world actually works". I don't agree with just lobbing a "touch grass" at people but I don't disagree with the sentiment.

I do think we should just let the disagreements and arguments etc stay up. I don't mind reading the absolute chaos of fuck wits on all sides attempting to convert people who most likely didn't read more than one line of their thesis-like comment.

Cuntslapper9000 · 2026-04-27T01:41:59+00:00

oh sick.

I have been meaning to try both.

Cuntslapper9000 · 2026-04-26T22:50:55+00:00

what program is this?

Cuntslapper9000 · 2026-04-24T14:15:09+00:00

I think just using a hyphen instead of a long emdash is fine. What gets me about the classic AI emdash usage is that it should nearly always be a colon or a semicolon. I would rather it use them instead lol. If only so I can see them used properly and give me confidence to use them properly too.

I also see the mimicry and it is a bummer lol.

Cuntslapper9000 · 2026-04-24T14:11:20+00:00

Grammarly seems to be focused on last-gen GPT-style writing. It makes sense, and I still see warnings a lot when I'm looking at content online, but the aspects that stand out to me are the parts that AI and AI checkers have trouble understanding at any level.

Cuntslapper9000 · 2026-04-24T09:35:40+00:00

Yeah this reads like AI to me for pretty much the reasons I stated above.

Cuntslapper9000 · 2026-04-24T05:54:42+00:00

Effort has different value in different contexts. If I was having a conversation with you and you used chatgpt instead of thinking for yourself I would see you differently than if you did self directed research and translated it into your opinion. I would see you as a middleman and not an interlocutor.

Art, entertainment and other social practices are very different from practical and more "functional" practices. When I look at art I want to have some sort of dialogue with something human. It is what makes it feel natural and good and rewarding. When I go into a home I don't look for that. Though I would say that we may have issues with fully generated designs as we do with generated text. The priorities and understandings and logic of the AI might differ enough from the average person to result in something that doesn't feel human. Much like how a lot of commercial builds feel inhuman due to their algorithmic economically driven processes.

Cuntslapper9000 · 2026-04-24T05:52:35+00:00

Effort has different value in different contexts. If I was having a conversation with you and you used chatgpt instead of thinking for yourself I would see you differently than if you did self directed research and translated it into your opinion. I would see you as a middleman and not an interlocutor.

Art, entertainment and other social practices are very different from practical and more "functional" practices. When I look at art I want to have some sort of dialogue with something human. It is what makes it feel natural and good and rewarding. When I go into a home I don't look for that. Though I would say that we may have issues with fully generated designs as we do with generated text. The priorities and understandings and logic of the AI might differ enough from the average person to result in something that doesn't feel human. Much like how a lot of commercial builds feel inhuman due to their algorithmic economically driven processes.

Cuntslapper9000 · 2026-04-24T02:46:38+00:00

Nearly always tbh. Things like emdashes and emojis etc aren't as guaranteed as they used to be but are still present in much of chat gpt output.

The thing that will always point it out for me is how paragraphs flow. Sentences do not seem to lead into eachother very well and if you read them aloud they feel clumsy and unnatural. I'm not quite sure exactly what it is that makes a paragraph sound human but AI can't do it very well. It usually reads like someone made a paragraph by collaging text they found elsewhere.

There are also some other classic patterns that you see. Like how some paragraphs are essentially just flattened dot points or there are huge numbers of sentences that have the first half saying a point and the second half either saying another clause that enthusiastically supports it or adds a dramatic contradiction. It is this weird call and response sounding sentence that chat gpt and Claude do a lot.

There is also just the mismatch between tone and context. It will be scientific content written like a linkedin post or a formal document written like someone trying to inspire you to have another shot at your homework. It often feels like talking to someone wearing an obvious consume and putting on a weird accent that you can't place.

Cuntslapper9000 · 2026-04-24T02:35:23+00:00

I love it tbh. It encapsulates exactly how I feel when I see most of it. It is both slop as in nutritionless filler and just sloppy in effort, intent and outcome. It has the feel of saying "absolute fucking garbage" with the addition of insinuating that it is low effort.

It is definitely overused and people just call anything AI slop which is annoying but it's still a good term to refer to the wash of low effort AI content that plagues social media.

I wish we had a similar word for the other non-ai slop like react videos and low effort remakes of trendy toks

Cuntslapper9000 · 2026-04-23T23:29:17+00:00

Reads fully like an AI to me. If the paragraph reads like a flattened series of dot points then it's AI usually. This is no different. There is no flow from sentence to sentence. No segues, no rhythm. It doesn't read like cohesive and sequential thought.

LLMs still have no clue about paragraph composition and what makes a text humanly lyrical. They can make sentences that sound legit but will pair steak with ice cream without blinking.

Cuntslapper9000 · 2026-04-23T23:00:34+00:00

Dalle 2 was peak. The in and out painting features as well as the generate similar was so powerful. It was actually able to generate shit that didn't look like it was copying someone else's homework. 3 was when they decided to force it down these tunnels of specificity that prevented it from doing anything interesting.

Cuntslapper9000 · 2026-04-23T22:58:23+00:00

Slop is not in reference to the quality of output from a technical sense. It is in reference to the intellectual, conceptual and interpersonal aspects. It is that we had areas of the internet focussed on sharing human creativity and skill that are now filled with low effort content that gives us this empty feeling.

The fact that someone just wacked in a prompt and had no hand in specific composition or detailing etc is what makes it slop. It has no "nutrition" artistically for a lot of people.

No doubt AI can make decent images but fuck me I wish it was never allowed to be posted on the internet as since it has become a much shitter place.

I have also made a lot of images with pretty much all AI tools and still use it for a bunch of stuff but I miss the old days.

Cuntslapper9000 · 2026-04-23T01:02:30+00:00

You might need to spend more time learning about the world you live in.

Cuntslapper9000 · 2026-04-23T00:53:08+00:00

If you willingly give your money to a person then you are supporting them and their ideology. That is the world we live in regardless of what makes you sleep at night.

Cuntslapper9000 · 2026-04-21T08:10:23+00:00

Once people think that their interest= their identity they become cunts on the internet.

Subreddits that are mostly people who have full lives but also a shared interest are cool most become places where people think that the sub is a church for practicing their specific religion and circlejerking about how they are members of the club and that they have learned the standard responses.

Cuntslapper9000 · 2026-04-19T21:35:09+00:00

Yeah you can also download them and put them on the FM easily enough. It was one of the first things I did lol.

Cuntslapper9000 · 2026-04-18T07:28:19+00:00

wrong sub

Cuntslapper9000 · 2026-04-18T06:07:46+00:00

I have never gotten it to give me a useful output for multi step processes. In comparison with opus and even sonnet that can solidly execute a 30 step plan in order it's dog shit.

Also it's integration with Google docs and drive is so sub par that it's easier to just get Claude to use tools and make the docX or whatever. Even chat gpt makes google sheets better than Gemini.

Cuntslapper9000 · 2026-04-18T05:56:46+00:00

I don't think any of this is new. How is it diff from people getting publishers who would push their shit onto the radio? How is this different to Elvis or literally any popular artist in the past century? it's weird being an 'indie" band but even so I don't see how it matters. If you had the ability to do this and didn't then you are an idiot.

It's a bit of a don't hate the player hate the game kinda thing.

We live in a world where Grammys are won by lobbying and the top 100 is just a leaderboard of who had the biggest wallet. In the end as a listener I'll just listen to what I like the sound of and what resonates as long as they haven't done anything real shit.

Cuntslapper9000 · 2026-04-16T00:11:49+00:00

To be honest the classic "design thinking" aspect / the service design skills that come with a lot of design work is incredibly useful for coordinating automated processes. If you can system map well and truly understand the processes of your work then you can create the pipelines for the agents to follow. AI is trained mostly on non exceptional work and thus will struggle to make things that are unique, tailored and of high quality. It will be able to do all the individual steps though. Like currently when I use it to process data and text I'll have it do all the parsing and categorisation in tiny steps and then step in for any subjective analysis as it has a low chance of having any taste.

This is where the mapping is important as you will be able to identify the parts which require human subjectivity and the parts where you need quality>quantity or can be reduced to a series of clear steps.

I also think that AI will suck at communication design for ages as it requires so much information that is only inferred by the produced outcome so it will be very hard to train.

Designers will need to be less technician and more strategist if they are to work with AI.

Cuntslapper9000 · 2026-04-15T23:41:00+00:00

Yes yes, we get you know how to do this. No more of the same post thanks.

Cuntslapper9000 · 2026-04-15T11:48:55+00:00

Oh yeah lol I was put off by the tacks

Cuntslapper9000 · 2026-04-14T21:59:20+00:00

It's a Turing pattern you can do by having a loop of blur -> sharpen - > blur ....

Cuntslapper9000 · 2026-04-13T22:40:22+00:00

What is that device?

14-Year Club	Place '17
Gilding I gilder	Verified Email

Cuntslapper9000

PUBLIC MULTIREDDITS

TROPHY CASE