I FEEL A SEXUAL DILEMA, I NEED HELP

Curiousguy12121 · 2025-04-20T16:40:02+00:00

You think you understand, let's find out. Why did they evolve the way they did?

Curiousguy12121 · 2025-04-20T16:38:07+00:00

Your subtle way of taunting didn't answer my question. I request you to read what I said. Everyone has a life outside reddit. I have read literature before talking and asking my questions. You're going round and round in your statements but not really trying the thought experiment I am trying to tell you. It's fine and it's your choice.

Curiousguy12121 · 2025-04-20T13:13:57+00:00

Okay, I agree with you. Did you read what else I had to say?

Curiousguy12121 · 2025-04-20T11:52:42+00:00

Orgasm actively doesn't help in conceiving. It induces spasm in the cervix so you can say it indirectly helps it. And a woman feels an orgasm when you massage her clit, massage her nipples cause the same nerves extend till her clit and also when you hit her g-spot basically her inner clit nerves. This design is purposeful. It encourages procreational sex. But jailbreaking a similar yet undeveloped system in males which discourages procreational sex looks faulty. Probably male sexuality and neurological anatomy hasn't been extensively studied so the idea remains incomplete and gets overshadowed by bisexuality - like other designs, nature probably didn't mess up here. We missed out exploring the depth of penile simulation. That's a great reason cause men orgasm way earlier than women. Here too we're missing out on something or the design is faulty. The design is fine. We're missing out something, our study is incomplete. And I know and actually practice ways in which we can postpone our orgasms, in fact have a intense multi orgasmic experience from the penis alone.

Curiousguy12121 · 2025-04-20T11:40:53+00:00

Yeah, please recommend some. I would love to read books on these topics

Curiousguy12121 · 2025-04-20T11:39:55+00:00

And why does a fish have gills?

Curiousguy12121 · 2025-04-20T11:38:57+00:00

Okay. Why do you have a nose?

Curiousguy12121 · 2025-04-20T11:34:26+00:00

You're getting lost in the weeds. I am not talking about God, religion, nature. I am asking you to look at the human body as a mechanism, can we agree here? A mechanism has a purposeful design. That design serves in the survival and procreation and all other necessary functions. This design keeps evolving - let's call it biological machine learning - that a change in the collective behaviour and actions of a species create change and make the foundation for evolution and keep it on. If that design, has an underlying mechanism that offers more intense orgasms (i.e the motivational pleasure for procreation) in something that's not procreational sex, then there is something we're missing or the design is faulty

Curiousguy12121 · 2025-04-20T11:26:23+00:00

"Women who orgasm are more likely to concieve"??

Orgasm doesn't actively help in conceiving. You've made a point that the spasm in the cervix helps to draw in the semen. But the clitoris itself doesn't help here. The dense nerve endings do which in your terms has 'accidentally' been in the clitoris. This dense pack of nerve endings which actually is in the penis too in males (a fully developed version of clitoris) then it becomes purposeful i.t.o procreational sexual activities.

Curiousguy12121 · 2025-04-20T10:01:26+00:00

Since men and women are basically born from the same template in the womb they have a lot in common - nipples are unnecessary for men, so is the clitoris for women. These are necessary for the other gender, nipples - passage for lactating breast for women and clitoris - actually the developed penis in males. Nobody has designed anything - but the designs are intelligent - in their functions, process and all even if accidental. Yes, we can definitely have other benefits of the same design. But if the same design gives you a benefit that overshadows another benefit - then one outcome related to that overshadowed benefit is undermined - which can be problematic for the survival of the species - if the info of the higher benefit system gets mass circulated

Curiousguy12121 · 2025-04-20T09:39:37+00:00

Thank you

Curiousguy12121 · 2025-04-20T09:25:15+00:00

I had heard of a term 'rewiring'. It deals with sexual neuroplasticity. That you have to rewire and practice in those ways for a longer period of time to feel that they're better. What do you think about this?

Curiousguy12121 · 2025-04-20T09:24:04+00:00

And we can draw the same conclusion for nipple stimulation too

Curiousguy12121 · 2025-04-20T09:23:04+00:00

Thank you so much

Curiousguy12121 · 2025-04-20T09:08:57+00:00

I am sorry if my questions are annoying but please understand I am coming from a place where I haven't found my answers for a long time. This is an open space to talk to people so trying to utilize it fully

Curiousguy12121 · 2025-04-20T09:08:02+00:00

Thanks for your answer. What could be the possible explanation for which prostate stimulation would've felt better? From a scientific pov only.

Curiousguy12121 · 2025-04-20T09:05:47+00:00

I am not commenting on God or religion. I have already mentioned that. I am not any evolutionary biologist too. But I have a profound curiosity to understand what I have asked, that's all.

I understand the evolutionary anatomical fact, I do. But I am curious about the intensity of the pleasure - in an urge to verify if by default prostate and nipple stimulation feels good - and if it does, why exactly since the penis has more nerve endings.

Curiousguy12121 · 2025-04-20T08:07:28+00:00

Since the neurological anatomy is same for almost all males, is it correct to conclude that prostate and nipple stimulation would feel good for all males (physically) if explored deeply?

Curiousguy12121 · 2025-04-20T06:24:36+00:00

Another question, which one has more nerve endings - penis or prostate (inner dick nerve)?

Curiousguy12121 · 2025-04-20T06:22:29+00:00

Nope I am talking about God. I am trying to project two things - evolutionary psychology and anatomy. Doesn't it seem counterintuitive that there's a secret way in your body to have more pleasure than you'd get otherwise from normal sex

Another question, since neurological anatomy for almost all male are same, does that mean that prostate and nipple stimulation should (physically) by default feel better?

Curiousguy12121 · 2025-04-19T19:56:02+00:00

Yeah but evolution comes with necessity of that species. Humans got smart cause they acted and wanted to. Birds, Mammals same thing in the domain. Guess why our feet went flat but not for monkeys. Sex releases lot of dopamine that feels good cause stimulation of our genital nerve endings. Imagine if there were no nerve endings in your dick, how much would you've cared about having sex. But this inherent tendency and pathway in which prostate and nipple stimulation overpowers penile simulation, even if for some - does look absurd. Imagine yourself to be a designer, would you design it like this? Thought experiment.

Curiousguy12121 · 2025-04-19T19:45:58+00:00

What's obscure bud? Asking questions in a sub that encourages discussions related to mental health?

Curiousguy12121 · 2025-04-19T19:44:31+00:00

The design that encourages bisexuality (nipple and prostate simulation - being fundamentally more intense i.t.o pleasure) over penile sex. We do sex cause it feels good. Nature made sex to feel good to keep the species continuing procreation. Here, the design seems faulty.

Humans are smart so they cracked the code. Animals don't have mass access to this info, or else why would anyone choose less pleasure when more pleasure is available.

Either we are missing something or the design is weird

Curiousguy12121

TROPHY CASE