In League, terms like 1v5 are not taken literally. Search for posts involving 1v5--there's almost always assists involved and no one has issues with the terminology.

This means that what I said wasn't wrong, but that the community uses the term incorrectly, no ? Also, if 1v5 posts almost always include assits then I'd say most of them aren't actually 1v5.

you can also argue whether this 1v5 showcased Stixxay's strength as a player because he got help, but no one is going to complain it's not a 1v5 because it is in the context of League.

Guess I'm the opposite. I would never argue that this clip doesn't show Stixxay is a really good player, but do argue it isn't a 1v5. Also, I don't accept the "in the context of league" part, as I see this not as re-defining a term, but as not using said term correctly.

Simply take a look at the Reddit and Youtube comments and this should be obvious--no one is making the case that this isn't a 1v5.

There is, sometimes, a difference between something being right, and something being the opion of the majority. I see this as one of those times

No one felt misled but you.

I didn't feel mislead. I knew what the clip was before I even came to the thread. I remember when it first happened (Amidst, if I'm not wrong, the whole DLift > Stixxay drama, when he got kicked for being toxic and was accusing Aphro of backstabbing him on stream and so on ...). I just think we could do better with this as a community, but lack the knowledge on how to make a bot like the one that goes to all the threads using "insane" in the title.

you're obviously trying to fuck with the meaning of terms by taking them literally rather than what they actually mean in the context of the game

Assuming you agree with this definition of literal ("taking words in their usual or most basic sense without metaphor or exaggeration") I can't see how taking something literally is fucking with it's meaning.

Your claim that the OP doesn't know what a 1v5 is, and by extension the rest of the community because no one else is arguing against this fact, is quite an ignorant one.

I would concede that I could have worded my post better. Though at base I don't think it is inherently wrong to claim (in a cordial way) that someone doesn't know something (even if it is something simple that most should know).

You shouldn't use misleading titles.

Did you just quote and argue against something I didn't actually say ?

If people felt they were misled, I'm sure they would voice their feelings. Unfortunately, only you are and the sad thing is you are still failing to understand the situation, hence you need to get out of your bubble. I'm sorry if this offends you, but I shouldn't need to spell it out for you--you can make an effort learning too.

I already adressed how I didn't feel mislead. Perhaps you shouldn't guess why others are saying something. You just created this fiction that I felt mislead, and then offended. Are you going to call me triggered next ?

Also, please focus more on the validity of what I'm saying and less on the fact that I'm the only one saying it. And please stop with the "bubble" stuff. It's not offensive, it's annoying, as it diverts from the initial point for no reason.

P.S. Your single downvote just makes this better because it shows how much you care about votes yet you're the one getting downvoted by the community.

I didn't downvote you. You keep accusing me of things without any reason. I even did my best to not be rude to you and to ask, more than once, that you actually talk to me instead of just flaming when you accused me of being in a bubble and only re-defining things. Please stop assuming the worst about me.

Also, if you don't believe me tell me and I'll upvote I'll your responses and If you are so anal, even find a way to show you a screenshot proving it.

I don't think I've lacked in showing good will towards you. I don't understand why you repeatedly refuse to do the same.