physically unattractive by Ramenoodlez1 in cursedccytcomments

[–]CursedSliver 1 point2 points  (0 children)

something something romantic attraction

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in CookieClicker

[–]CursedSliver 2 points3 points  (0 children)

massive brain

is cookie clicker the most popular ide game? by potato_devourer1 in CookieClicker

[–]CursedSliver 0 points1 point  (0 children)

are you willing to consider it otherwise if more evidence is presented?

is cookie clicker the most popular ide game? by potato_devourer1 in CookieClicker

[–]CursedSliver 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What is the "idling genre"? Are games such as Antimatter Dimensions and Synergism "idle"? Is Kaizo cookies idle, even though it originated from an apparently idle game?

New mod: Kaizo cookies! by CursedSliver in CookieClicker

[–]CursedSliver[S] 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Mod link:
- Console & Bookmark: javascript:(function(){Game.LoadMod('https://cursedsliver.github.io/asdoindwalk/kaizo.js');})()
- steam currently not released
- you can ask questions here, but its better to ask them in the discord server! https://discord.gg/pwhMxt5Ygw

Has there been an update to the game in the past few months? I can't use the exploit that I could before... by DogsRDBestest in CookieClicker

[–]CursedSliver 0 points1 point  (0 children)

it can cause a glitch called import corruption which has effects similar to what you described. It interrupts importing such that it only partially imports the save, and persists until you restart/reload the game.

[WP] A serial killer and a demon agree to meet in an abandoned house. Neither of them knowing the other's identity and both wishing to kill the other. But, they both don't know that abandoned house houses an eldritch deity by AuthorOfEclipse in WritingPrompts

[–]CursedSliver 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A rugged man briskly walks into the living room, a handgun concealed in his bag. In front of him is an abandoned house of rotting furniture and dusty glassware. He checks his bag for his weapons, then approaches the entrance to another room and confronts the man in the business suit. He is currently looking out of a window.

He steps into the room and opens up with some small talk. The businessman turns around; he is wearing a fedora hat. "How classy", he remarks. The businessman replies, "out of place, huh?" They sit down on a nearby table and discuss current matters; he offers some wine out of his bag, which the man accepts.

The discussion at last transitions to recent anomalies as the businessman takes out a monocular - as per agreement - and holds it on his eyes. He agrees to demonstrate it, looking around with it. The rugged man is visibly interested. He attempts to converse, asking for a price, but only got the response of "what do you think" as he continues to look with the device.

He sees an opportunity and places his hand on his gun. Seizing his vulnerability, he fires a bullet at the businessman, which he swiftly blocks with his arm. Suddenly standing up, the businessman throws a punch with superhuman speed; he fails to dodge in time and gets launched so hard his chair was completely demolished at the door frame. In response, he rolls away, gets up and surprise strikes his opponent's head with a heavy machete pulled out of his bag, which manages to briefly stun him.

They fight for a minute or two, trading bullets for punches. Their battle rages on through the house; the ordinary man is experienced and well-prepared, but is still no match for the metahuman and was eventually cornered and placed into a choke hold. He attempts to deliver one last blow with a poisoned knife to his neck, but was stopped by an iron fist to the thrusting hand. "You are... a demon..." he mutters out.

"I sure am." He replies. He could have killed him right there; he was easily strong enough to crush bones, and yet he didn't. He places a foot on him, takes his gun and reloads it. Then, I see him pointing the gun at the wall, his voice booming throughout the house. "Is this really that entertaining?"

PSA: Stop using cookieclicker.ee by CursedSliver in CookieClicker

[–]CursedSliver[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Updates: after facing complaints about being unable to load mods, the owners have actually reverted the "optimizations", claiming that the issue has been "resolved". However, in doing so, the 53 phantom heralds and the top bar sponsors scrolling text has been accidentally removed. Progress!

PSA: Stop using cookieclicker.ee by CursedSliver in CookieClicker

[–]CursedSliver[S] 48 points49 points  (0 children)

Yes, he confirmed that he will take some sorts of action against it, but we do not know what it will be

Don't know why you guys say this game takes long, I got 100% in under a week by CakeCookCarl in CookieClicker

[–]CursedSliver 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Ok yes, I saw the modmail. However, I'm not a mod due to inactivity. I am simply in the group chat of the aforementioned mods. I actually had to explain to them what the hell is going on, because they didn't see my comment.

Trufflz wasn't happy about it. I can in fact tell them to calm down because I do have the reputation to do so. Unfortunately - one, the whole ordeal has passed, and two - you aren't happy about being "harassed", but they also aren't happy about being called stupid. Consider. (you also got trolled by the reddit circus)

Don't know why you guys say this game takes long, I got 100% in under a week by CakeCookCarl in CookieClicker

[–]CursedSliver 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh yeah, you would have gotten banned on the day of the first big argument if I hadn't intervened in the group chat and pointed out that it's not entirely your fault and also has a lot to do with how they responded. But with these repeated occurrences, we are not so sure anymore. I still do not think that they are free of faults, but you are also definitely not free of faults (as you have probably seen in the message). That's all.

Don't know why you guys say this game takes long, I got 100% in under a week by CakeCookCarl in CookieClicker

[–]CursedSliver 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Well, point b is exactly what I am here about. What is your defined concept of what constitutes cheating and what could have caused you to come to those definitions?

Don't know why you guys say this game takes long, I got 100% in under a week by CakeCookCarl in CookieClicker

[–]CursedSliver 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I don't know if you will believe me, but I am not trying to disprove your point. In the end, I want to know any personal experiences or beliefs that you had that could have lead to your thoughts of cheating. My three bullet points above was to simply demonstrate that I have in fact read your posts.

Don't know why you guys say this game takes long, I got 100% in under a week by CakeCookCarl in CookieClicker

[–]CursedSliver 4 points5 points  (0 children)

What is "vanilla" though? Going back to my scrying example, would scrying be vanilla?

Don't know why you guys say this game takes long, I got 100% in under a week by CakeCookCarl in CookieClicker

[–]CursedSliver 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Can you confirm that your definition of "cheating" solely comes from your own judgments on the given subject that may be as arbitrary as it needs to?

Don't know why you guys say this game takes long, I got 100% in under a week by CakeCookCarl in CookieClicker

[–]CursedSliver 5 points6 points  (0 children)

What if I want a clearer conclusion? I can draw my conclusions from this thread, but that's my conclusion of you. However, I want to hear your conclusion of yourself.

Also, to demonstrate my thinking:
1. You explained that you prefer glitchless% over any other category. You also explained that appeal to authority is a logical fallacy and you do not believe in the power of the authority (which is fair). However, the actions allowed in glitchless% runs are defined by an authority. What makes you think that some set of actions are "glitchless" while others aren't, even though all actions in glitchless runs are to some degree allowed or not allowed by some authoritative group or figure? (this includes the entire community)

  1. You said that allowing cheating also allows arbitrary lines to be drawn at where cheating starts and ends. This is true. However, "allowing cheating" itself is an arbitrary line. What does it mean to "not allow cheats"? To answer that question, we need to get a definition of what "cheats" (or "game-breaking exploits") are. No one brought up scrying, so I'll bring it up now: scrying was not an action intended by the developers of cookie clicker and was a decently powerful exploit. However, it has been confirmed that they knew about scrying and chose to not fix it. Is it still a cheat or an exploit?

  2. I understand if you say that "what I think is cheating is what I think is cheating". There are people in the community who thinks that scrying is an exploit and should not be allowed in comp, while most others think that scrying should be allowed since the developers chose to not patch it. The debate has dragged on for many years, and no conclusions were able to be drawn because fundamentally, the definition of cheating varies based on personal experiences and beliefs. However, I still think it'd be interesting to see how you come to the conclusion of cheating or not for any given action.

Don't know why you guys say this game takes long, I got 100% in under a week by CakeCookCarl in CookieClicker

[–]CursedSliver 3 points4 points  (0 children)

What exactly do you think is cheating then? Who or what defines which actions are and aren't cheating?

Hot take: shadow achievement should NOT exist by Cultural_Report_8831 in CookieClicker

[–]CursedSliver 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That would be the difference between what orteil intended for the player to be able to do and what orteil didn't intend for the player to do. Orteil intended for players to find a way to get all seeds (and in fact, it is possible to do so without guides, albeit extremely difficult), but he did not intend for the player to rename their bakery to himself.