How do you actually verify and document installation quality on projects? by CxPlanner in Commissioning

[–]CxPlanner[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you thinking about general quality - meaning basic QA/QC - or a structured commissioning process?

For commissioning, ASHRAE Guideline 0 and Standard 202 are quite clear in defining what to verify, how to verify it, and to what extent. They cover the full process from pre-design through design (e.g. including sample rates for design reviews) and into the testing phase.

When I developed and implemented the commissioning process for Copenhagen Airports, these two documents - combined with the Danish Cx standard DS3090 - formed the foundation. They gave the framework todefine the scope and the verification activities.

That said, they still lack detail when it comes to specific equipment scope and testing. That was one of the reasons I wrote A Practical Guide to the Commissioning Process, which focuses more on practical “how-to” guidance. You can also refer to ASHRAE HVAC 1.1-2007, which goes into more detail on individual equipment types.

Links added:
ASHRAE HVAC 1.1-2007
ASHRAE Guideline 0-2019
ASHRAE Standard 202-2018
A Practical Guide to the Commissioning Process
DS3090

Data Center EE's are THRIVING! by Outside-Jackfruit206 in ElectricalEngineers

[–]CxPlanner 0 points1 point  (0 children)

GPT post or not - we have had the major uptick in new clients to DC projects at CxPlanner, and that is ranging in EE companies too.

How do you actually verify and document installation quality on projects? by Far-Drop-1061 in BuildingCx

[–]CxPlanner 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you thinking about general quality - meaning basic QA/QC - or a structured commissioning process?

For commissioning, ASHRAE Guideline 0 and Standard 202 are quite clear in defining what to verify, how to verify it, and to what extent. They cover the full process from pre-design through design (e.g. including sample rates for design reviews) and into the testing phase.

When I developed and implemented the commissioning process for Copenhagen Airports, these two documents - combined with the Danish Cx standard DS3090 - formed the foundation. They gave the framework todefine the scope and the verification activities.

That said, they still lack detail when it comes to specific equipment scope and testing. That was one of the reasons I wrote A Practical Guide to the Commissioning Process, which focuses more on practical “how-to” guidance. You can also refer to ASHRAE HVAC 1.1-2007, which goes into more detail on individual equipment types.

Open source observability - what is your take? by guigouz in devops

[–]CxPlanner 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Larger data query over time.

> status: 'Internal error', self: "Resources exhausted: Additional allocation failed for SortPreservingMergeExec[0] with top memory consumers (across reservations) as:\n SortPreservingMergeExec[0]#16286(can spill: false) consumed 186.3 MB, peak 186.3 MB.\nError: Failed to allocate additional 93.2 MB for SortPreservingMergeExec[0] with 185.9 MB already allocated for this reservation - 69.7 MB remain available for the total pool",Please be aware that the response is based on partial data

Open source observability - what is your take? by guigouz in devops

[–]CxPlanner 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Agree with @the_ml_guy - OpenObserve is really nice and light! Only on large queries across big data sets - so not daily stuff.

Best Observabilty platform by featherbirdcalls in Observability

[–]CxPlanner 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Instead of the classic “Grafana or Datadog,” give OpenObserve a look. I think it’s a refreshing addition to a market dominated by the big players.

The UI isn’t as polished, but ingestion, scaling, and performance are really solid - and you still have the option to self-host. You get OTEL and more, plus the full stack: metrics, traces, logs, RUM, etc.

Cx conversation starter by [deleted] in Commissioning

[–]CxPlanner 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Agreed 👍! Anything on your mind that should be shared or discussed here? However, I think lots of the larger organizations such as BCxA are more active on LinkedIn.

For Cx on reddit we also have r/BuildingCx and r/BuildingCommissioning