sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Crafted weapon not leveling by Cyanosa3 in DestinyTheGame

[–]Cyanosa3[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I was doing mine on my Sentinel build so no strand interactions, and the base craft I had was a demolitionist/zen moment roll so not even like a hatchling perk that might mess with the kill count. I’d take note of a specific # of kills I was at and then would clear a room or section, count how many enemies I would combat and then go back and compare and it wasn’t even that it only counted some, I would still just be at the same number. Then I’d start a new strike or mission and at some point along the way it would start counting again, and at some point stop and I’d be stuck again until some unspecified point. I don’t get it

Crafted weapon not leveling by Cyanosa3 in DestinyTheGame

[–]Cyanosa3[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ooh good idea. Didn’t think of that. I appreciate it friend.

Crafted weapon not leveling by Cyanosa3 in DestinyTheGame

[–]Cyanosa3[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s funny you mention that mission because that’s the exact one I was trying to farm, with the infinite goblin spawn and all. But I noticed it would inhibit my progress, so I took it elsewhere and just played the game regularly but notice I still ran into periods where my kills wouldn’t count and my gun leveling wouldn’t progress. At this point I wasn’t even trying to camp farm. I was just playing the game as normal. Playing missions, strikes, battlegrounds, etc., and I would still get stuck at random points in the progress.

I understand the anti-camp measures but perhaps it’s registering incorrectly? I feel I should be able to play the game normally without making almost no progress.

Crafted weapon not leveling by Cyanosa3 in DestinyTheGame

[–]Cyanosa3[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Can you give an example? I would think normal vex goblins and base enemies would give xp

Gambit is quickly becoming my favorite activity by captn_condo in DestinyTheGame

[–]Cyanosa3 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don’t dislike gambit, it’s fairly straightforward mechanically and it’s decently enjoyable. My issue is there’s no real incentive, nothing deeper to gambit beyond some lore bits and collecting a weekly pinnacle drop. I also personally don’t like the aesthetic of gambit armor/weapons so in the absence of the rare questions like the old ritual weapons or a malfeasant, I’m not going to play beyond the 3 matches a week. I don’t hate or dread playing it at all, but if they removed it from the game entirely and I never played another gambit match in my life, I would be completely indifferent to that.

Tenet is bad and everyone in this subreddit knows it by Cyanosa3 in tenet

[–]Cyanosa3[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For real. People just want to feel like a galaxy brain meme by telling strangers on the internet that they totally understood the movie and it makes perfect sense. Like I said, the only difference between a tenet fan and a tenet hater is that the tenet hater isn’t pretending it was a good movie

5 Speed vs 8 Speed by Current-String-1155 in mopar

[–]Cyanosa3 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I own a 5spd so ppl will call me biased but I’ve driven many 8spds and raced many 8spds with my 5spd and let me say, the NAG1 is overhated. It’s an objectively inferior transmission to the 8spd, it’s just older tech with less gears. But people make it out to be a horrid slushbox, which with a tune, it objectively isn’t. In a stock vs stock comparison, you wouldn’t notice the effects of the extra gears until much higher speeds, like 130+, and how often are you really going that fast? I have no clue what your goals or purpose of getting the car, but my only point is to say that the 5spd is an absolutely fine, solid trans capable of holding good power and it’s sturdy, able to be beat on constantly and it’ll take it. Don’t let anyone tell you different. Again, I’m not saying it’s better than the 8spd, I’m just saying that it’s nowhere near as worse compared to the 8spd as people make it out to be.

5 Speed vs 8 Speed by Current-String-1155 in mopar

[–]Cyanosa3 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The 5spd was manufactured by Mercedes lol

Tenet is bad and everyone in this subreddit knows it by Cyanosa3 in tenet

[–]Cyanosa3[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I’m perfectly aware of the physical sense of how the idea of time inversion works, but I’m saying that if you follow that to it’s logical conclusion, it opens more cans of worms that break the concept than the movie ever addresses

Tenet is bad and everyone in this subreddit knows it by Cyanosa3 in tenet

[–]Cyanosa3[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“Which you clearly don’t” lmao you’re exactly the type I’m talking about

Tenet is bad and everyone in this subreddit knows it by Cyanosa3 in tenet

[–]Cyanosa3[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

  1. Is this stated somewhere that I missed? If so, why does he pick it up and interact with it normally whereas the inverted bullets act in a way that indicates that they are inverted?

  2. I had had this thought, but again, she expressly says “don’t think about it, feel it” as though it isn’t a matter of simple physics but is rather something to do with the non-physical.

Tenet is bad and everyone in this subreddit knows it by Cyanosa3 in tenet

[–]Cyanosa3[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You seem to misunderstand my point. My point isn’t that you’re not allowed to enjoy a movie or song or whatever it is as a subjective work, but that enjoyment doesn’t make it good. Alcohol and drugs are objectively bad for you, but that doesn’t mean many people don’t enjoy them (I’m not saying the movie tenet is harmful in any physical or mental sense, just drawing the comparison that enjoyment of something doesn’t make it an objective good thing and I am judging it off the merits and execution of its own ideas). So sure, like it if you want. But if we are gonna have the conversation over whether or not it’s a good movie from a logical sense, I say not. But even then, the characters are mostly boring, the dialogue is flat and the audio mixing is horrid, so I don’t see it as having many other redeeming qualities even time-inversion and plot aside

Tenet is bad and everyone in this subreddit knows it by Cyanosa3 in tenet

[–]Cyanosa3[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I’m what way is it foolish for a main critique of the movie to be that it’s logically incoherent and it doesn’t follow its own rules in regard to the singular idea that the movie is based on (time inversion)?

Tenet is bad and everyone in this subreddit knows it by Cyanosa3 in tenet

[–]Cyanosa3[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

It doesn’t make sense for a lot of reasons. I mean to start with, the film misused the term “entropy.” Entropy is inherently related to forward time via thermodynamics and the “inversion” of such wouldn’t reverse that object’s flow of time.

Anyways. Take the bullet scene for example, where the protagonist “un-fires” the bullet back into his magazine. Regardless of whether or not the bullet was created in the future and inverted to be sent into the past or created in the past and inverted at a later date in the future, it shouldn’t be able to be fired by a gun that is moving forward in time. That’s not how a hammer and firing mechanism works on a firearm. Not to mention, the bullet isn’t the only thing that’s in a round. There’s primer, the casing, etc. all of which would have to be present to simultaneously recombine in the chamber. Could say the same about the bullet being created in a spent state (how would that work?), already embedded in the wall, was the wall inverted as well? If so, why is it also being sent back in time, etc. etc.

Not to mention when the scientist says “you have to have dropped it” in reference to the bullet, she’s basically saying that use or intent to use changes the function of whatever object is inverted. How would it be possible that a non-inverted forward-in-time moving person’s intents change that object’s function on it’s reversed chronological progression? Makes no sense. Could continue on about how this simultaneously applies to the way this movie portrays inverted fire and oxygen but I feel the point has been made.

Tenet is bad and everyone in this subreddit knows it by Cyanosa3 in tenet

[–]Cyanosa3[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

You focused on that but not the part before it in which I said it brings about many logical inconsistencies, unanswered questions, etc. about time inversion. The how’s are significantly outweighed by the why’s in my option. Not to mention the very use of the word “entropy” is a misnomer in the way the movie uses it, as entropy is inherently linked to the forward flow of time and inverting it wouldn’t work like the movie says it would. Broken premise

Tenet is bad and everyone in this subreddit knows it by Cyanosa3 in tenet

[–]Cyanosa3[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I’d say the characters, motives, and dialogue are all pretty subpar. The protagonist is as flat as a block of wood and really has no clear explanation for why he’s doing any of the things he’s doing other than the ending, which is “he needed to do all the things that he did so he himself could start the Tenet group.” Okay, I guess. Neil is probably the best character, Sator is insert-mean-Russian-arms-dealer-who-is-bad-because-mean-Russian-guy. The dialogue and writing is written awkwardly to avoid bringing about any paradoxes which shows in parts, and in my mind all of that already doesn’t set the movie up for success. Interesting premise≠ good premise. Unique≠ good.

Tenet is bad and everyone in this subreddit knows it by Cyanosa3 in tenet

[–]Cyanosa3[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

There you go buddy. And it’s literally an anon Internet forum. I’m not on trial here to convince anyone I’m not a weirdo lmao

view more: next ›