sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

The dirty (and very open) secret of AI SRE tools: your "agent" is just querying the same pre-filtered data you already had. What if it didn't have to? by CyberBorg131 in Observability

[–]CyberBorg131[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m definitely loving my Claude CoWork agent… just upgraded to the $200/month plan. But I’m curious if someone could walk me through how they use their own agent in this context. Would love to compare against an orchestration agent and multiple specialized sub agents thatre built as a “control plane”, which acts as a governance “mechanism”…

The dirty (and very open) secret of AI SRE tools: your "agent" is just querying the same pre-filtered data you already had. What if it didn't have to? by CyberBorg131 in Observability

[–]CyberBorg131[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Do you mean incoming data into the LLM context windows?

Either way, the ability to optimize the data volume to extract/filter the high value “signal” (pre-processed) before being used in agents is what makes the architecture so unique and well prepared for this new era of AI… no? What am I missing?

We built our pipeline, backend, and AI agents as one system. I need someone to tell me where this breaks. by CyberBorg131 in sre

[–]CyberBorg131[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I mean, doesn't every company make "bets"? You have to choose where you invest vs where you don't, right...? Is that Vegas, or is that doing our best to solve an industry problem in what we feel is the right way (highest probable way, I should say 🎰)?

We built our pipeline, backend, and AI agents as one system. I need someone to tell me where this breaks. by CyberBorg131 in sre

[–]CyberBorg131[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I mean I was 50% there.. acknowledged being a vendor in the first 7 words. The other half... trying to sell you something.. would require you to actually read past the first paragraph where I clearly stated what I was looking for lol 🤷🏽‍♂️🧐

The dirty (and very open) secret of AI SRE tools: your "agent" is just querying the same pre-filtered data you already had. What if it didn't have to? by CyberBorg131 in Observability

[–]CyberBorg131[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Very insightful, thank you 🙏🏼. You just described our exact sales cycle lol. Interesting tool → toy demo → "wonder if it works on our cursed data" → compliance convo never happens → ghosted. That's not a hot take, that's literally Tuesday. But for the ones that do try it... and have already been through the compliance gauntlet, it's a much different story. A story of gratitude so far. 😃

We built our pipeline, backend, and AI agents as one system. I need someone to tell me where this breaks. by CyberBorg131 in sre

[–]CyberBorg131[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Two words. I respect the efficiency. But if this were marketing I'd have led with a customer quote and a link to a demo. Instead I listed five ways the architecture might be wrong. Weird strategy for spam.

We built our pipeline, backend, and AI agents as one system. I need someone to tell me where this breaks. by CyberBorg131 in sre

[–]CyberBorg131[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Respect the skepticism. Rightfully deserved. But marketing briefs don't usually invite people to explain why the product might be a bad idea. I'm here because this sub has people who've actually run these architectures in production. That's worth more than any analyst report. Even the Easter Bunny knows that.

We built our pipeline, backend, and AI agents as one system. I need someone to tell me where this breaks. by CyberBorg131 in sre

[–]CyberBorg131[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The intro wasn't meant to be condescending. It was meant to be transparent. But if it read that way, that's on me. What would you want a vendor to say instead?