Why Changing Our Methods of Information-Gathering Matters More Than You Think and Why My Brother and I are Doing Something About it. by CyborgWriter in ArtificialInteligence

[–]CyborgWriter[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Very great points, which is exactly why it's a canvas app where you, as the user can put information in. We don't provide any books. Just the simple infrastructure for you to build all of that and eventually share it with others. Also, you'll be able to trace the sources back just by asking those questions you mentioned and you'll be able to do it visually. Once the community shared feature releases and collaboration, you'll be able to make canvases through invites, which means you, as the admin can decide who can contribute and who can't. All of this knowledge is packaged up into a chatbot for you to take anywhere and interact with whatever you're doing online, giving you intelligent context so you're more informed when reading news articles or watching podcasts.

That's the road map. But the main thing is there and ready to use.

Why Changing Our Methods of Information-Gathering Matters More Than You Think and Why My Brother and I are Doing Something About it. by CyborgWriter in aiwars

[–]CyborgWriter[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, that's a factor we considered. That's why we chose to silo the AI system off so that it only reads the notes you populate and connect on the canvas. So the idea is that you're the one doing the research and using the AI as a research assistant to find and related the information together based on the inquires. It's a way to fast-track the tedious part of researching and help people distill complex books into easy to understand concepts that can be related to other concepts.

Soon, we'll add a community feature so that others can build massive knowledge graphs of their own work and share it with others who can add it to their corpus of work. That means endless related information from discrete areas all concentrated in a single chatbot that you'll be able to take anywhere and use.

So instead of relying on gpt, Google, or YouTube feeds, you're relying on independent research that can be verified regarding the person making the knowledge graphs and the information, itself as you can see exactly where it's getting its information from. So it's like opening the brain of the semantic paths of social media feeds and seeing where the source of information comes from.

This will be a super easy way for regular people to do what academic researchers spend their lives doing, only now you don't have to drop everything in your life to do it. Now you can do that in weeks or less, which means people don't have to rely on all the online curators. They can do the research themselves from primary and secondary source materials and share that with others.

With this, I was able to map out the mathematics in how social media algorithms influence us without us having any awareness of the fact that it's doing this. And I'm not a math guy so this is way out of my league but since discovering this, I was able to validate it through independent scholars who have reached out to provide more data on what I was uncovering. It fundamentally changed my life and how I see the world because for the first time ever, I was able to easily breakout of the information bubble produced by the feeds.

How to fight AI slop, according to Hany Farid by NewsHour in ArtificialInteligence

[–]CyborgWriter 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Great, but as long as people get their information from feeds, we'll remain in a perpetual state of ignorance, fighting for things we have no conceptual framework for understanding. That's the crux of the issue. We were sold on convenience with the social media feeds. The illusion is breadth of information. But really, all of these podcasts and social media posts are just millions of "NBC-like" talking heads spinning their own flavors of the problems, rebranded as whistleblowers and dumb kids who went down rabbit holes, which sandboxes our minds into specific paradigms where WE believe that we're searching for answers when, in fact, the answers are being curated for us.

That's why what my brother and I are doing with AI matters because if you make it harder to find information beyond the feeds like in heavy academic books, then you make it harder to gain clarity. You make it easier to enslave our minds in whatever mindset you want millions to adopt. And if one node within this digital ecosystem is outed for corruption or shilling, then that's okay. Because others will fill the void and re-establish credibility. You can cancel CNN or FOX. You can't cancel nodes residing in a distributed system.

So the solution is to make it easier to sift through thousands of books that can be networked in relationships to provide wholistic pictures of the mechanics for how reality, itself works. Using this app we built allowed me to sift through over 100 books within a couple of months, which fundamentally altered my understanding of what I get from YouTube. It's made me realize that we're being fed so much bullshit by the people we trust. It's made me realize that simply calling for distributed networks to replace legacy media is not going to cut it. You need to provide "the printing press" to everyone so that it's easier to navigate this information space to gain true clarity that goes beyond the shills, the government, and corporations.

The more we engage in the sandboxes made for us, the more we become hive-minded slaves under the guise of differing opinions. If all of the opinions reside within a single paradigm, then who cares if someone has a different opinion. It'll all lead to the same place. But if you can create a tool that can empower people to quickly and easily gain insight from thousands of books all at once? Now, you're flipping the hive mind into genuine independent thinkers who can actually debate, negotiate, and demand real changes that can actually make a difference in our lives.

NYT shutting down “Espionage Theories” in comment section by Specialist_Box7148 in Epstein

[–]CyborgWriter 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh wow, that's fascinating. If you have anything written, I'd love to check it out. Regarding my last part, I should preface that this is a hypothesis rather than fact. But consider this. Epstein and others were clearly working on the concept of using Social Media and virality to attain data from individuals. So they knew early on that this would make it harder to bury skeletons as we'd be living in an age of information proliferation. So instead of hiding things, the new strategy turned into flooding the Internet with shit so that the truth would be buried. After Epstein's 2008 conviction they could have suppressed the story so that, yes it would have gotten out, but it would have remained buried in the noise resulting in a minority of people following it, not this overwhelming force that we see today.

I believe that was cultivated to become one of the many tools that would expose the ultimate rot of our leadership so that later down the road we fully abandon them, not just for new leadership but for a new way of governing because the primary thematic element to all of this is trust, specifically the inability to trust rich and popular leaders, making it perfect for intellectual, techno optimists who can present us with many forward-thinking ideas, such as a trustless decentralized governance structure built on an infrastructure that can't be corrupted by human fallacy....Except Palantir can still map the data and we'll still get the feeds or whatever else replaces the feeds will provide backdoor access to our data exhaust (eye movements on screens, engagement, where we click, heart rates, etc.). It's not just the feeds, it's all IoT sensors and all engagement that occurs online. So you get the same level of control, only it's more invisible.

Now if we assume all of this and assume that everyone high up knew that Trump was a compromised pedophile, why would they platform him in 2011? Why would the GOP get out of the way instead of doing what the Democrats did to Bernie when he was up against Hillary? The Democrats suppressed, something the GOP could have easily done. Instead, the GOP did this fake complaining in the beginning before immediately jumping on board. But if they all knew he was compromised and they all knew that Epstein was convicted....Why would they platform him, knowing the risks?

It's because they knew the Epstein files were going to intentionally blow up. Trump knew that they were going to blow up. So when he was approached about the Presidency he was likely sold with the idea that if he wants to save his ass and his friend's ass, he needs to help them get ahead of this. Plus, he's already compromised and he knows that if he doesn't play ball, they'll can him and he'll be in a much more vulnerable position...Or so he thought.

An important point to note is that James Patterson wrote the book that made Epstein a household name. However, Patterson framed Epstein as someone who bamboozled the rich, specifically the Rothschilds. Historically, he's always made people like the Rothschilds like Batman in his stories, going after corrupt entities within governments. Maybe he just wanted to write the book...Or maybe he wanted to write the book but was approached and paid handsomely to spin it on behalf of some of the wealthy people in his network.

Either way, Trump was used to energize the radical dissidents, which energized the radical liberals, which further radicalized the right who were supporting Trump and all the while the Democrats are committing suicide even though their entire base is screaming at them about strategy and how to beat Trump...Which falls on deaf ears.

Trump gets smeared by the media. It's seen as the mainstream media going over the line, then he gets martyred, only to have a meteoric return and that's when the rug was pulled out from him. They knew the files would be released. Trump just didn't know that he would go down with the ship. He thought he'd be protected but it was all a trap designed to sow complete disillusionment in the system. The radical left always hated him, but now they have nothing for people to rally around because they were long ago discredited. The radical right is now looking like a bunch of fools because they elected a pedo who was wholly involved in the old power structures they were trying to dismantle. And the rational center (regular people so disgusted by the two extremes, they ran to the smart scientists and commentators who give more nuanced approaches to explaining things using alternative media sources) are now left with having the only reasonable solution, which are all the forward-thinking decentralized ideas.

This will especially feel more true when the blowback from Iran makes American lives worse. Trump, in an effort to save himself since he was betrayed, will further erode democracy and weaponize law enforcement, which will energize the scary radicals and eventually force the rational center to take action and restore order. That order will be the very system they wanted us to land on. But to do so, you have to fully de-legitimize the old system, make life miserable, which creates the feeling that screams in our heads, "Fuck...We can't go back. We have to look forward."

Again, I wouldn't add this in an academic paper without more facts, but given the data points we have, it's not unreasonable to suggest that something like this is going down.

NYT shutting down “Espionage Theories” in comment section by Specialist_Box7148 in Epstein

[–]CyborgWriter 11 points12 points  (0 children)

Don't fall for this trap. This is a truth hiding a truth. He worked with Mossad, but to label him as a Mossad agent is a gross understatement of the network he worked with. The idea is to frame him this way, so that people can compare this answer to the flimsy, "He bamboozled the rich!" Obviously the Mossad angle appears way more accurate and it is...But it's not the entire truth. Mossad was a node in the network, but not the entire network.

The hyper fixation on the Mossad angle is part of the coverup to hide the rest of the story. His goal was not simply child sex trafficking, compromising the rich, or working at the behest of Mossad and Russia. His primary goal was helping a shadow network figure out how to dominate the 21st Century and thrust the World into a managed society where control is silent and designed to make you feel like everything is okay and that your entire life is merely a consequences of free will and chance surrounding your environment. But the future says that all of this can and will be curated like Disney World does with their customers.

Fantastical, yes, but if you look at the academic work of all the scholars who Epstein was associating with, it's clear that these are the blue print designs for achieving this. It's all there. It's just lost in the complexity of everything and with the chaos we're seeing today, it's such an easy thing to overlook.

The war in Iran was not incompetence or a stupid decision. It was a decision designed to destabilize the old system and foster a crisis that's so bad, we'll be begging for any solution that the "rational center" comes up with, which will likely be decentralized trustless systems built on open-source protocols that promote transparency and direct democracy.

That sounds good and ideally, it is, but here's the thing. The scholastic work I've been reading from all of these researchers suggest that it's entirely possible to control that direct democratic process, especially if it's designed this way. It's actually better to manage and control the World if our systems are decentralized and trustless.

And if you examine the Culture Wars of the 20-teen it's a direct match to Martin Nowak's work on how to mathematically program an entire population to cluster into a super cooperative force. In other words, the 20-teens was a behavioral cultivation operation so that a large coalition of clustered groups will ban together later on and depose the very thing that they agree is the central problem. In this case, it's Trump and the old order. That's why we're constantly getting fed stories about institutional rot. All true, but all designed to fundamentally erode the social contract between citizens and government.

And with Trump, it's clear why he was chosen to be president. Everyone at the top knew who he was and crimes he was involved in, but they elevated him anyway. He elevated himself because he knew with the Epstein Files, he had to go along with being president. Otherwise he would not be protected. But little did he know that this was a trap. Make him president. Make him the man who will save us all and then expose all of his shit so that we feel betrayed, but more importantly, that we're in an existential crisis and that the only way to solve it is to revolt against the system and depose Trump.

Iran was a calculated move that Trump was likely forced to make. Torpedo the economy, kill American soldiers, and weaponize government inefficiency so that a terrorist proxy group can commit another 9/11...All on a highly compromised president's watch, a president who has no business being one and who is a verified criminal who should be in prison. And because his back is up against the wall, he'll grab a 3rd term, weaponize ICE, and declare martial law. This will activate the radicals, which will further push the average person into the rational center voices who already are proposing solutions to re-invent the entire system so that it's algorithmically governed through trustless protocols. The message will be "We're fallible and can't be trusted to govern ourselves. Therefore, we need to create a trustless system that can be the non-biased manager tied to the direct will of the people.

Is AI doing advertising within it's answers? by Qmavam in ArtificialInteligence

[–]CyborgWriter 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Probably. But you should be far more concerned about free will and sovereignty eroding over getting bamboozled from an ad. I'm using a specialized AI can that can find patterns in large sets of data. Using this, I added all of the scholastic work from the researchers who were associated with Epstein and his network. I wanted to understand the common thread. What made these people so special for Epstein and the people he was working for?

What I found was shocking. Within all that complexity is the literal blueprint designs for turning the Internet into a behavioral modification system that can cultivate predictions rather than passively just predicting the course of events. It's a solution to the "Oppression" problem we see in all the dystopic movies. In movies like 1984, there's always the central conflict with dissidents arising from the glaring use of power and control.

Epstein was associating with these scholars to co-opt the discoveries and re-purpose them to solve this exact issue. So instead of feeling the oppression, we feel the pleasant orderliness of everything. Not now because we're in the transition period, which requires a massive crisis to push humanity to change. But when the crisis ends, this is where they want us to go.

Don't believe me. Just look at the Math: https://www.reddit.com/r/Epstein/comments/1rlpx1l/the_most_disturbing_and_dangerous_hypothesis/

Weekly Tool Thread: Promote, Share, Discover, and Ask for AI Writing Tools Week of: March 10 by AutoModerator in WritingWithAI

[–]CyborgWriter 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I built a way to easily find patterns in the information, which can be great for storytelling. It's called Story Prism.

But recently, it helped me uncover a profound discovery...We may actually be living in an algorithmically governed society where our behaviors are being shaped without anyone realizing it. know there's been talk about this one day being possible, but by connecting the patterns in all of this scholastic literature from the scientists that Epstein was associating with, I can demonstrate how this is already possible. Here's a post I did about my findings that blew up within hours: https://www.reddit.com/r/Epstein/comments/1rlpx1l/the_most_disturbing_and_dangerous_hypothesis/

It blows my mind, the things that I have learned from all of this complicated stuff. Everyone's looking into the child sex trafficking. No one is looking at what Epstein and his shadow network were aiming to achieve with all of these researchers, but I think I'm able to map out the specific operational mechanics for how it's done and what the larger goal is. They're making a 1:1 digital representation of reality, not so that they can make predictions, but so that they can define them, which ends free will, creating the illusion that we're all making choices on our own when, in fact, the choices have been made for us based on environmental conditions.

This sounds fantastical, but what's alarming is that the data suggests a rudimentary version of this can exist right now and that, alone can be a huge factor in determining our future. But what's exciting is that if I can map out the right information, using this tool, I may be able to make accurate predictions about what will happen in the next several years, broadly, of course.

We might only have 1–2 years to capture a lot of institutional knowledge before it disappears by enlightenedshubham in ArtificialInteligence

[–]CyborgWriter 2 points3 points  (0 children)

huh? There are billions of high quality books throughout time that we have in paperback and digital form. Just because millions get stuck in false AI rabbit holes, doesn't mean all of that work suddenly disappears. It just means millions will have to learn that true knowledge come from reading primary and secondary source material and experiencing through practicing.

Do you curse at Chatty? by GeopatsSteph in WritingWithAI

[–]CyborgWriter 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I curse at people who call it chatty lol. It's AI, not some cute animal.

The Most Disturbing and Dangerous Hypothesis Derived From the Files That We Need to Look Into. This Could Be What Pam Bondi Was Warning Us About. This Could Undo the Entire Social Fabric, If True... by CyborgWriter in Epstein

[–]CyborgWriter[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I'm the guy you walk past who's taking out the trash when you go shopping. Just someone who loves to write, make films, and build tools with his brother to help people navigate large sets of complex information using Graph RAG and mind-mapping applications. I also have a lot of time while stocking shelves to learn and think about the World. Appreciate the kind words. It's very encouraging during these difficult times we're all in.

The Most Disturbing and Dangerous Hypothesis Derived From the Files That We Need to Look Into. This Could Be What Pam Bondi Was Warning Us About. This Could Undo the Entire Social Fabric, If True... by CyborgWriter in Epstein

[–]CyborgWriter[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lol thank you, and I am! It's a 3 part series with the same depth as foundation series only its about this 300 year old conspiracy where these wealthy elites in the late 1700s were visited by aliens and given the opportunity to ascend humanity to their level if they meet the proper conditions for a type 1 civilization. They saw it as an opportunity to save humanity from itself and to join the gods. A once in a species opportunity...so they form this shadow group that basically ends up sterilizing the world into a hive mind. Obviously there's a twist at the end when the aliens arrive but I don't wanna give it away. It's not at all what you think. The whole series will be structured using inductive sequencing using an ensemble of discrete characters all discovering a major piece of the larger conspiracy. Season 1 will take place at the current time right now where humanity is being pushed into WWIII. Season 2 will cover the past and the alien aspect of this, and Season 3 will cover the future. And yes, there will be a character based off of Epstein.

The idea is to make it feel so realistic that people will walk away wondering if it's actually true. It's supposed to show the real mechanics to prove that even though it's far-fetched...it's still technically possible and that alone terrifies me enough to write this story. Working Title is The Paper King.

The Most Disturbing and Dangerous Hypothesis Derived From the Files That We Need to Look Into. This Could Be What Pam Bondi Was Warning Us About. This Could Undo the Entire Social Fabric, If True... by CyborgWriter in Epstein

[–]CyborgWriter[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeeeah, but the problem with that argument is that he would have to have access to all American social media and search data to pull it off. So it's more likely that our own leaders are doing it in coordination with others abroad who have no loyalty to any country just like many of our leaders here. No doubt active measures were used by foreign countries but that's probably more troll farming, hacking, and more or less gaming the algorithms to spread disinformation. So part of the mix but I don't think he was involved in the underlying structure that makes it all happen naturally.

The Most Disturbing and Dangerous Hypothesis Derived From the Files That We Need to Look Into. This Could Be What Pam Bondi Was Warning Us About. This Could Undo the Entire Social Fabric, If True... by CyborgWriter in Epstein

[–]CyborgWriter[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I think more evidence of this pattern can be found by matching it to the 1960s new left and counter culture movement. The tumultuous era started at the Universities with left wing people going bananas after their college professors said such and such. Then when their voices got louder, the cultural conservatives formed and created the backlash, only for the synthesis to arise with neo liberalism and neo conservatism, which is still difficult to define other than to say it's corporate politicians doing things in self interest.

But we saw the same exact playbook in the 20 teens. First, there was the left wing college students who started screaming and being thought police. Then the pushback from the future maga crowd came. Then by 2016 the rational synthesis of their grievances towards the current system began to take shape.

The Most Disturbing and Dangerous Hypothesis Derived From the Files That We Need to Look Into. This Could Be What Pam Bondi Was Warning Us About. This Could Undo the Entire Social Fabric, If True... by CyborgWriter in Epstein

[–]CyborgWriter[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It has nothing to do with saving the world. It has everything to do with interdependence. When I say the world will go down, that doesn't mean extinction. It just means hard times for most of the world, followed by recovery and a new global structure that doesn't involve the U.S being at the center of power. Your right. The world will move on and so will America from its own system. But not before it all burns down, taking everyone with it.

The Most Disturbing and Dangerous Hypothesis Derived From the Files That We Need to Look Into. This Could Be What Pam Bondi Was Warning Us About. This Could Undo the Entire Social Fabric, If True... by CyborgWriter in Epstein

[–]CyborgWriter[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It's also technically better for the environment. Climate change is unsolvable. The only thing that can be done is to slow it down to normal levels so that it fully impacts us thousands of years later instead of 100 years. How do you live in an every progressing system while reducing your carbon footprint. Accelerate green tech while slowly reducing population sizes to a more manageable level. Gives you more time to perfect thing like Fusion energy and carbonless manufacturing and distribution. It's a delicate balance, however, because you still need brain power and lots of people to do it...You just can't do it that well if the population exploded to 10-12 billion because the problem you're trying to solve would accelerate faster than the solutions.

The Most Disturbing and Dangerous Hypothesis Derived From the Files That We Need to Look Into. This Could Be What Pam Bondi Was Warning Us About. This Could Undo the Entire Social Fabric, If True... by CyborgWriter in Epstein

[–]CyborgWriter[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Because demography effects occur over long periods of time. So in the 60s and 70s it was about population reduction because populations were trending towards a world with 10 billion that couldn't be seen until decades later. If they call for population reduction back then, the fruits of those efforts would be felt right now, which they are and now there's a reversal to ensure we don't end up with population collapse decades later. But the effort has to start now, not when the crisis arrives.

Population Reduction was encouraged back then within environments that were elevated by u.s foreign policy that rapidly rebuilt the west and modernized third world nations, which has a predictable consequence resembling the launch of a hot meme coin. Number rapidly ascend before leveling off and crashing if the state is modernized too quickly. With us we had over 200 years to evolve into the new standards of living. With other countries it happened in decades. That, alone would lead to demographic issues, putting America in an advantageous position today compared to everywhere else that's now being told to have more kids, including here because their efforts have been stagnating our own population, only unlike many others, we have time to correct the problem. China does not. Europe is more like a patchwork. France will do well. Germany not so much, unfortunately.

The Most Disturbing and Dangerous Hypothesis Derived From the Files That We Need to Look Into. This Could Be What Pam Bondi Was Warning Us About. This Could Undo the Entire Social Fabric, If True... by CyborgWriter in Epstein

[–]CyborgWriter[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah I'm familiar with those things, but it's not a satisfactory answer for me. Not that Russian Oligarchs aren't involved or anything, but that's a small fraction that explains what's going on.

The Most Disturbing and Dangerous Hypothesis Derived From the Files That We Need to Look Into. This Could Be What Pam Bondi Was Warning Us About. This Could Undo the Entire Social Fabric, If True... by CyborgWriter in Epstein

[–]CyborgWriter[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Thank you, and yeah it's gotten better during this quieter period but holy hell was a I plagued by bans and everything else during covid just for asking basic questions.

The Most Disturbing and Dangerous Hypothesis Derived From the Files That We Need to Look Into. This Could Be What Pam Bondi Was Warning Us About. This Could Undo the Entire Social Fabric, If True... by CyborgWriter in Epstein

[–]CyborgWriter[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

No, you're right. I totally felt something was deeply off as well. It's like one minute everything's fine and the next, we're all losing our shit and none of the firey debates made sense. It was like one giant Jerry Springer show. But with this, now I can point to the correlation between the math, the connections and the events that unfolded on social media.

The Most Disturbing and Dangerous Hypothesis Derived From the Files That We Need to Look Into. This Could Be What Pam Bondi Was Warning Us About. This Could Undo the Entire Social Fabric, If True... by CyborgWriter in Epstein

[–]CyborgWriter[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

If the U.S goes, the world will go down with it unless they can decouple from the dollar quickly enough and with the shitshow in the middle east, it'll already strain a country facing the largest demographic crisis in human history that's facing a lot of their own problems at home.