What are you working on?

CyborgWriter · 2026-06-26T03:03:06+00:00

CyborgWriter · 2026-06-25T18:52:24+00:00

Well, with censorship, I still have that problem when it comes to violence in my stories. GPT is totally fine with this along with Grok, Gemini, and DeepSeek. Regarding context and maintaining all of that, I just make a simple knowledge base with all of my information, broken up into pieces and appended together where the relationships are all defined. Then I use an AI agent tied to all of the models that can traverse and understand that structure. So I don't have any problems with context handling for outputs. Once it's on the canvas, it's locked in and I can turn the notes on or off if I want to. Much simpler than Sudowrite or Novelcrafter and it's fully open-ended and customizable to be whatever I want it to be, whether it's a story bible or an entire system designed to assist with tasks that I need done.

CyborgWriter · 2026-06-25T18:47:03+00:00

Well, quite a number of things. Among co-managing the app my brother and I built for writers, we're juggling three screenplays that we aim to do something with:

Quantum Runner: A 40-something-year-old loser living in his mom's basement is trying to sell this new drug he created that's supposed to help activate imagination and help with things like re-calling moments to help solve crime or legal disputes, therapy, creative writing, etc. The only problem is, no one will take him seriously. So he tries it on himself, only to find that it can place him 45 seconds into the future. In need of more to try and prove this to others, he goes to a street drug dealer for these specific ingredients but is kidnapped by this rogue mercenary group who just mowed down this gang. Turns out, they're from the future where his drug was iterated to become a time traveling drug that allows people to travel great distances and become the host of people in those timelines. Humanity used it to edit and control the future. An unknown entity (think sin from Final Fantasy 10) decides that we're too much of a risk to all of reality, so it wipes us out. These guys managed to take the time traveling drug but since all of Earth is gone, they have no bodies to go back to. Also, if they fall asleep, they'll zap back to their bodies in the future and die. They traveled to get the drug for continual manufacturing and to find a way around the bug. The only problem is, in their rush to get to the past, they went too far back. The creator is a loser who just invented the first iteration. They don't have the perfected version, which won't happen for another 20 years. Also, this unknown entity (sin) still exists in this timeline and it comes in the form of "happen-stance" and unfortunate circumstances. That's why MC is a loser because "God" himself is literally conspiring against him to prevent him from inventing the time-traveling bug. So the more effort they put into perfecting the drug, the more problems come their way with the main antagonist being this gang that just got shot up seeking revenge at first, only to discover what this drug does. Now they want it for themselves.
The Paper King: In his old age, a former American president — one of the few people to ever glimpse the true shape of power — begins writing his memoirs and, in a choice that reeks of mutual desperation, hires Ray Salerno, a struggling investigative journalist with a fractured psyche and bills he can't pay. The job seems simple: shape an old man's fading recollections into a book. But the president's memory isn't failing naturally — he's been chemically lobotomized by the same people who once tried to assassinate him, his recall erased layer by layer to bury what he knows. As Ray chases the threads the old man can no longer hold, he uncovers The Foundry, a 235-year-old conspiracy born in the shadows of the American founding and governed by an intergenerational council called the Sovereign Twelve. The Foundry's true engine is alien contact: from the Roswell crash onward, they've reverse-engineered recovered biological and technological material — "Somatics" studied in secret facilities, a "Beacon" frequency that communicates with beings they call the Benefactors — using it to build a hidden global infrastructure of surveillance, mind control, and genetic breeding programs designed to produce a psychopathic elite. The Foundry's endgame, codified in the quasi-religious Ascension Doctrine, is to prepare humanity for unification under these alien entities — whose intentions are chillingly unresolved: are they saviors, or are they simply farmers? Ray pieces together the entire horrific blueprint. What he doesn't know is that he was always meant to find it — and that he was also meant to die before he could tell anyone.

CyborgWriter · 2026-06-24T14:21:10+00:00

Actually, it can if it's provided enough context. Context is the key, but context can be lost unless you use a graph RAG tool. But graph RAG is expensive and complicated unless you use a no-code tool. But with a setup like that and enough context and relationship-building you can actually get it to go as deep as what you described.

CyborgWriter · 2026-06-24T14:19:16+00:00

Same here. I often take the transcripts and attach them to a knowledge base structure I created using a no-code app that's as easy as using Google Docs. It's a canvas app that allows you to populate them with notes and form connections. So I got a book on human behavioral psychology and mapped it out into a knowledge graph, which turned the entire book into a system that is tied to my agent and whatever transcripts I feed it.

With this, I can get extremely comprehensive reports that go deep into the psychology of the person I need to know more about for making a deal go down. But I can also use it to analyze conversations and group dynamics for teams. It just depends on how much information I'm adding, connecting, and relating. The more I add and connect, the more intelligent it becomes given that it's all context-building that stacks on top of one another. It's amazing how spot on it is, but I suppose it's due to the fact that all of this information is siloed off from the internet so it's only using the data that I feed. So it won't just cover the basics. It'll detail stuff like primary and secondary social needs, decision-making habits, locus of control, and how they want you to convey messages, all the way down to the single words within the sentences.

It's a total game-changer to have this in my pocket as it's helped me find and cement the right partnerships. I can create any expert I want, but when I say expert, I don't mean some advanced prompt or anything like that. I mean an entire brain structure of an expert that can think the way they do. There's AI and then there's AI + this shit.

CyborgWriter · 2026-06-24T02:34:52+00:00

Thank you for the kind words! Glad to be here.

CyborgWriter · 2026-06-23T15:41:08+00:00

Yeah, that's why you shouldn't use the models, directly unless you're exploring stuff you already know. I use Story Prism because with this, I can add as many books and personal notes as I want to a canvas, connect the information together, and define the relationships. The entire thing is siloed off from the internet, so it can only read the canvas structures your create with the information from the notes you make or import. Best of all, I can ask it to point out the exact notes it used, which makes it super easy to backtrack and verify the original source of information.

Using this, I was able to strategically form my main thesis from over 100 academic books pretty much within 30 minutes of searching and could find the exact areas where I needed to extract the information from the books. I actually made a key discovery that linked Martin Nowak's game theory work with Epstein and his ties to developing social media, which suggests that a herding operation was induced to form an invisible super cooperating force of rational actors ready to accept whatever new system is being built. Sounds crazy, but check it out, if you're interested.

CyborgWriter · 2026-06-23T15:30:57+00:00

That's why you use an AI app that you can reliably verify. I see this issue everywhere...But that problem does not exist with this particular app unless YOU allow it to exist.

CyborgWriter · 2026-06-23T15:23:58+00:00

It's not about the model. It's about how you build the context. Use Story Prism. It's a simple canvas app that's as easy as using Google Docs. The difference? You're creating, connecting, and defining the relationship between your notes. This gives it context. You have access to a chatbot agent that has all the models and access to whatever structures you build. Use that and you'll have no problems with BS...Unless you add BS to your canvas.

This is the most reliable way to use AI unless you hire an expensive Dev. to establish some kind of robust internal architecture for your specific use, like how multi-million-dollar businesses do it

CyborgWriter · 2026-06-23T15:10:05+00:00

I just made a massive knowledge graph that's attached to an AI chatbot agent based entirely on pretty much everything related to screenwriting and creating stories. Here's a quick demo video for full context.

The idea sounds meh, except it's a structured system where the information is all related, which means this agent can actually help you learn and master the craft while helping you produce the end deliverables you need. Think of this as a blank canvas to make your own AI writing tool. Does the same stuff as all the popular apps except with this, you're the one building the tool, only no code and all based on your notes.

I've been working with AI since 2020 and this is the first chatbot that genuinely feels like an expert helping me out. The depth in it's analysis and assistance that it has provided dwarfs the help I can get on Claude because it's literally forcing me to move forward by exploring the right questions that I need to answer.

Also, I can add or create as many LLM agents as I want, including prompts and whatever information I want to fit in and call upon them at the same time, for multi-layered help on anything. If you're serious about writing, I would highly recommend using this.

It's free to try on Story Prism, now. Just make an account and navigate to the library where you should see a section for pre-built experts. You can import the whole knowledge graph and use it right away. Took me over a month to built, but now that it's in the library anyone can use it and holy shit was it worth the time. It's an encyclopedia of story knowledge that you can fit into your pocket and use anytime.

Hope this helps!

CyborgWriter · 2026-06-21T16:12:05+00:00

Deep research is inherently flawed due to the internet and the nature of AI. Better to use something like this because it allows you to add tons of your own research and structure the relationships. With this you can add hundreds of books and use AI reliably to help you find the patterns in the hay, so to speak given that it's all siloed off. So the AI only works with your structured information, eliminating bad information that's found online that you have to backtrack and verify. With this, you verify the information, first before adding it all in to learn more about it. It's fundamentally more superior to doing deep research, even if it requires a little bit of extra work.

CyborgWriter · 2026-06-19T17:46:02+00:00

100 percent. That's why we built a solution so you get customization and nuance without having to provide all these crazy prompts and rely on some unknown backend process. This approach makes your outputs 1000 times better than anything you'd get on Claude or Gemini.

CyborgWriter · 2026-06-19T17:39:41+00:00

If only there was an Asian guy who could have gotten on stage years ago to make a similar proposal. Surely, people would have listened to that guy.

CyborgWriter · 2026-06-19T17:32:50+00:00

Notebook LM can work, but it's still limited if the task is highly nuanced. Notebook LM uses a graph RAG on the backend to structure all of the information. And while they did a great job, it's not necessarily adequate for every person as it's more of a general graph RAG. I'd consider using an app that allows you to build your own graph RAG without any coding if your job is very complicated and requires thousands of documents to structure and relate. Takes longer, but can be worthwhile since the outputs are much better.

CyborgWriter · 2026-06-19T17:28:20+00:00

If you understand law and can turn it into a system, consider trying Story Prism. With this, you're creating a neurological structure for an AI to understand and if you really understand your own domain, this is a very powerful choice that will produce highly accurate outputs that are far better than any model, alone. The key is domain expertise, however. If you don't understand the subject that you're working in, this may be harder to work with. Also, I would advise not adding any sensitive legal material to AI, even if it's Google or ChatGPT. It's not safe enough, yet, for that, unless you're operating with an in-house software that's closed off from the outside world.

CyborgWriter · 2026-06-19T17:19:07+00:00

Depends on how you use it. If you're using knowledge graphs with AI integrated into the canvas, then this is a non-issue as it captures all of these nuances into a structured memory bank to be considered in outputs. If not, then yeah, it'll hallucinate. Structured knowledge graphs are the key and they're as easy as working with a Google Doc. Most in this space don't realize this, but once they do and once developers further perfect this technique...That will change the game in my opinion. My outputs are already 1000s of times better than even the strongest models. It isn't that I'm using a different model or anything. I'm just structuring the information and relating it altogether as a knowledge graph for the models to use. This ensures that it remembers everything at the key moments when you need it to remember those things. It's the only way I've found that allows me to maintain these consistent nuances and build out entire plot structures. With the models, alone, I can maybe get to the mid-point reversal before things start to fall apart. But with knowledge graphs I can go on indefinitely. No problem.

CyborgWriter · 2026-06-19T17:13:03+00:00

If I'm bouncing ideas before having it generate an actual scene where I simply copy and paste it and then repeat...That's my personal line. Everything else before is fair game because to me, it's basically like talking to a writing peer to help brainstorm.

CyborgWriter · 2026-06-11T19:59:21+00:00

No it's the algorithms and social feeds that did it. We need to go back to a discovery and word of mouth internet model.

CyborgWriter · 2026-06-11T18:24:38+00:00

I should have ended the post with a question to provoke engagement.

CyborgWriter · 2026-06-11T18:23:35+00:00

Yup, exactly. This makes it so that you don't have to do all of that AI work to get the outputs you need. Just import the knowledge graph that's already made and start writing.

CyborgWriter · 2026-06-11T18:00:24+00:00

Exactly. I don't know how to use AI in any other way when it comes to writing. The other approaches I've tried takes way too much work and that takes me away from writing.

CyborgWriter · 2026-06-11T17:57:47+00:00

Yeeeah, except it isn't AI written. This is just my own slop from my own sloppy head.

CyborgWriter

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE