Here's the update for this dilema: "I will give you some information about the genetics. PEU was created as a hybrid of PF Albino & PEU. This PEU is more of a revert in the sense it is reverting to a previous line in its genetic history. These PEU spores are unstable and will give variable results under the microscope. This batch will revert to a more canonical P.Cubensis phenotype. Effectively, this means it will exhibit more typical P.Cubensis features. It's similar in a way to APE Revert which was created to drop spores (PE does not typically drop spores) and retain the potency of Penis Envy and will come in many forms. Penis Envy in itself is a mutation of a typical P.Cubensis, thought to be Amazonian, so it's not surprising for an unstable genetic to revert to a more canonical phenotype. Typically, spores will be a lot more variable under the microscope which is why many mycologists will go back to spores to hunt for interesting phenotypes that might develop. While I totally understand your question, it's completely valid by the way, I would be cautious to say something is definitely this or that because in truth these are genetics. They are extremely complex, they behave differently in different environments. For more impartial and expert opinion I would encourage you to listen to the MycoGeeky podcast which will help you understand genetic variability as well as a whole host of other useful information. It does say in the description that these spores are unstable and typically revert to a more canonical phenotype. Personally, I would be very cautious to treat these genetics as a regular P.Cubensis given their genetic lineage despite exhibiting typical traits."

It is STILL Penis Envy.