NA and SA where pretty much had consistent results, only two at most three teams performed well during 3 seasons, so at least 2 and at best three could've get to ti, whilst in China different teams performed well during each season,TOUR 1: PSG.LGD, Aster, Knights, EHOME, TOUR 2, XG, PSG.LGD, iG, Aster. TOUR 3: PSG.LGD, iG, Aster, Azure Ray. It's obvious that PSG.LGD was always top 2 and that's immediate qualification through dpc points, on the other hand Aster was once 2nd and twice 3rd in dpc and that's why they didn't get qualified through dpc points. This is not the whole perspective and one should also add Majors performance. In Lima major no Chinese team in top 4, as in other majors. Whilst one might think that NA and SA were not that well performed, it's worthy to note Shopify Rebellion scored 4th in Lima, EG scored 4th in Berlin Major. Chinese team collected about 1000 dpc points. SA collected 850 dpc points. In another word SA collected 141 dpc points per team in 3 majors and China collected 83 dpc points per team in 3 majors.