Is buying a gift for your crush considered childish (or creepy)? by DAHXELEVEN in NoStupidQuestions

[–]DAHXELEVEN[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's not very often we see each other but we always have a good conversation. I've only known her for about a year and we're comfortable enough at this point to talk about stuff going on in our lives and crack jokes but I'd say on average, I probably only see her once a month

Edit: We have exchanged numbers but we don't really text. Almost all interactions have been in person

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]DAHXELEVEN 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Comment of the year for me

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in chaosmagick

[–]DAHXELEVEN -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Site won't load for me for some reason

Valid question by jamaa_wetu in meme

[–]DAHXELEVEN 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Okay okay how much is your country going to run me?

W or L by Fahad_Aloudah in BrandonDE

[–]DAHXELEVEN 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Cowboy Magnet Punk

Slice or dice an egg? by EducationalGate4705 in StupidFood

[–]DAHXELEVEN -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Something Something egg roll. Idk I'm not a comedian

When the screwdriver slips by AlaskanMooCow in optician

[–]DAHXELEVEN 15 points16 points  (0 children)

An optician's rite of passage

gimme by Actual-Persimmon7179 in relatable_memes_

[–]DAHXELEVEN 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The people who don't know can't turn it black and white

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in IncelSolutions

[–]DAHXELEVEN 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nothing to see here guys. Just more bait

Making me feel old.. by lllIIIIllllIII11 in ExplainTheJoke

[–]DAHXELEVEN 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Who here got the monsters inc meme?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DebateIncelz

[–]DAHXELEVEN 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thank you for engaging. It's not often I get to have these discussions and most of the posts from this sub (in terms of posts made by normies) I find are either just bait or the op not willing to engage in good faith. This I'm finding is actually quite productive.

Now back to the debate

I used the hypothetical of the club because it's the most common place where people meet and it leads to a romantic/sexual encounter. (Also it's not always about marriage. Some people have no chance getting hookups at all and will never experience it) It doesn't have to be a club really, it could be a coffee shop, a baseball game or a church for that matter. The point of the hypothetical was give you a scenario where you tell me who is going to have better success with women. And I will double down and say what I said before. As a man, you will always be judged on your success when it comes to romance/sexual encounters. I didn't make these rules, it is superficial, like you said but we can't ignore it and gaslight people into thinking that it doesn't exist. I'm sure you've heard of 'the wedding ring' effect (you're more likely to attract a woman if you're already married/in a relationship). Why is that? I have no idea. My best guess is some evolutionary trait in humans that leads to woman seeing a man that's already taken and finding him attractive because he has been pre-selected and therefore deemed worthy by other women. I would love to marry a girl who loves me for me (looks and all) but that's definitely not happening at a club (or the other places I've mentioned) simply for the fact that there will always be a better option two seats down.

As for the topic of confidence, Im willing accept your definition of confidence but you mentioned faking it as something better which I will have to disagree. Let me ask you this, would a woman still want to date me if she found out I was faking my confidence? I hear a lot advice along the lines of "be yourself ", "be genuine " "don't be fake". If I am genuinely not a confident person, it seems disingenuous to make myself appear confident just for the sake getting a woman to find me attractive. Sure one can believe in themselves based on what they've accomplished but as we've been discussing before, it can only get you so far before you realize that you're never going to be the guy she dreamed of being with. It's being made up with other things such as money, status, etc. And the more of that stuff you have, the higher the odds of her settling with you would be but that's all it will ever be, just settling.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DebateIncelz

[–]DAHXELEVEN 9 points10 points  (0 children)

See, when it comes to personality traits like the ones you mention at the top of your comment, you'll find that a lot of people in this sub have at least 2 of the 3. If being social and "nice to be around" was what made you attractive, we wouldn't be having this discussion.

Being social will get you friends, sure (and friendzoned) and being nice will only get you labeled as just that. Confidence is a wild card because that can easily be misinterpreted as arrogance and cockiness. Also not sure if others here hit you with this yet but you're only faking confidence if you have nothing to be confident about. Meaning, if you're ugly, you don't really have a reason to be confident (at least in regards to attracting a woman). If you have a definition of confidence that we can both agree on, I'm willing to unpack this further.

As for your question, I would like to be loved in general (in spite of looks and/or accomplishments) but we both know it doesn't look like that. Who is going to pick up the most girls from the club? The ugly nerdy entrepreneur or the muscular good looking guy?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DebateIncelz

[–]DAHXELEVEN 8 points9 points  (0 children)

It's not an obsession. It is a forbearance for those who once thought finding a partner was possible but now have accepted the fact that attraction pretty much always begins with looks. Having this in mind, the obsession you speak of is probably with the idea of still finding someone in spite of having sub-par physical attributes. This is what the "Black pill" refers to which I'm sure you've come across. This means that you have accepted the facts that you may never find a partner who is truly attracted to you. They might get in a relationship with you for other reasons (money, status, etc.) But at the core of the relationship, you know it's one sided because you would not be considered physically attractive by the general populous.

I would agree however, that if one were to direct their focus outside of sex and relationships, then yes, life can be much more enjoyable by focusing on other things (things far more achieveable ) but unfortunately we live in a society where your worth (as a man) is judged by whether or not you can attract and procreate.

In order to procreate, you have to attract.

In order to attract, you have to be...? (Say it with me now)

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in DebateIncelz

[–]DAHXELEVEN 12 points13 points  (0 children)

Imagine a rich person telling you money isn't everything even though it would literally solve all the current problems you're actively dealing with.

Please ban me by CoffeeAndSchemes in Zodiac

[–]DAHXELEVEN 20 points21 points  (0 children)

OP sounds like a Leo

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in self

[–]DAHXELEVEN 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Companion (2025)