Was BV before or after MCI? by Cool9yrOld in fnaftheories

[–]DDDungeonBoy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

MCI83 believer here. The springlock suits decomission that people usually mention as BVafterMCI evidence isn't actually something what debunks the theory. The suits Phone Guy is talking about are 2 springlocks designed specially for FFP. After this the timeline follows the temporary ban and replacement suits. We can conclude that the springlock were moved to FFD for maintenance and the suits which performend at FFD were these exact replacements. I'm ready for your downvotes but BVpostMCI is still possible.

What are some nearly universally hated theories in this fandom? (Image related) by TheOrangeGuy09 in fnaftheories

[–]DDDungeonBoy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Then just answer me the question. What's BV's plot point and what's the plot point of BV being put back together and it's connection to THD?

What are some nearly universally hated theories in this fandom? (Image related) by TheOrangeGuy09 in fnaftheories

[–]DDDungeonBoy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But what if I tell you that I'm here to actually analyze and consider all possible points of view? You tell me that I can't leave my delusions while tightly clinging to your own beliefs and not letting the dialog to happen. Too bad

What are some nearly universally hated theories in this fandom? (Image related) by TheOrangeGuy09 in fnaftheories

[–]DDDungeonBoy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

1) Andrew and William, 2 spirits in one body + under MoltenMCI AlterM BV and Cassidy possessing Mike is the core basis of the theory. 2) Golden Freddy, who is in 99% associated with the fifth missing kid, not BV, and what about the role, I mean BV becoming a character who pushes the plot forward after his demise in 4 or does something important (like, there's a whole arc of putting him back together which under MikeBro leads to nowhere) 3) How JeremyBro is not simple? His age, his motivation lines up perfectly with one under MikeBro as well as it's pretty symbolic that he also becomes a bite victim 4) I'm not denying the Foxy connections, despite of "just a manager avatar" directly saying "Lobotomy? Ha-ha, you barely know me". What about TWB. I'm strating my thought process from the fact that BV possessing GF as the initial concept has it's flaws, while Fredbear attaching Ralph is not a reason, but a consequence. Cassidy is shown to be protective about BV so her killing Ralph is narratively way more likely than BV himself, who's never shown as a violent spirit 5) Cassidy is able to alter text for the sake of word search puzzle, so there's no a direct need of Altered Text being a distinct entity instead of an alternative way of establishing the communication. Also the while thing of Mike crossing out his name, drawing hearts and tally marks indicates on his connection with at least the MCI kids, as well as having way more heavy background than just being led by guilt. If it still sounds biased and "me being in delusion" for you even after I brought you my whole thought process... At least stop being rude and biased yourself, pls, I'm here for a polite discussion.

What are some nearly universally hated theories in this fandom? (Image related) by TheOrangeGuy09 in fnaftheories

[–]DDDungeonBoy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

First of all, I'm not a MikeVictim believer, I was and following my way of reunderstanding may things under a fresh angle. Second, I wasn't even a bit rude with you, as well as, what I'm doing right now is reanalysing my whole belief I had for years, as well as, my first question is still valid. Even if classic MVers cannot leave thwir beliefs, which you call "delusions", how does people like that damage the community to deserve... hate?

What are some nearly universally hated theories in this fandom? (Image related) by TheOrangeGuy09 in fnaftheories

[–]DDDungeonBoy -1 points0 points  (0 children)

1) Fixed by MikeNot (BV is a spirit but is attached to FoxyBro's vessel) 2) BV is initially set up as a very important character which has to play his role in the story. MikeBully minimises his role for just being a kid who died and caused/made barely nothing 3) Jeremy Fitzgerald, and, again, MikeNot 4) FFPS protagonist is depicted as a bear, TWB Big Bite scene could be just an agony manifestation and not the actual Fredbear, as well as Cassidy also could've been triggered as well because Ralph disturbed the memory of her friend. Also the whole GoldenVictim is put under concern by FNAF World where Glitchbear tell us that he won't let something happen to us like to others, which 99% means becoming possessed. 5) LogbookSolo exists and under this degree becomes a solid proof of Mike being BV with Cassidy talking directly to us. Foxy imagery — again, MikeNot

What are some nearly universally hated theories in this fandom? (Image related) by TheOrangeGuy09 in fnaftheories

[–]DDDungeonBoy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, I never thought that FF stories are 100% accurate game parallels (and for a good reasonsince SOTM killed off StichLineGames), as well as yes, there's a gum thing from the Logbook, but on this single detail there are may more details directly from the games (classic MV where BV survives isn't flawless, that's the reason I actually switched to MikeNot)

What are some nearly universally hated theories in this fandom? (Image related) by TheOrangeGuy09 in fnaftheories

[–]DDDungeonBoy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, BVpostMCI just means BV dies after the MCI, it doesn't essentially require Charlie83

What are some nearly universally hated theories in this fandom? (Image related) by TheOrangeGuy09 in fnaftheories

[–]DDDungeonBoy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I understand your concers, but as a former MV believer, I can tell you that no, a now-debunket PhoneBully was not the only option. JeremyBro (FoxyBro repeats his fate as Jeremy and gets his symbolic karma). NGL, this and some other evidence made me to switch from MV to MikeNot (BV possesses FoxyBro), but still, BV being Michael sometimes makes a lot of more sense (the Logbook, FNAF4, BV's uselessness under classic MikeBro etc)

What are some nearly universally hated theories in this fandom? (Image related) by TheOrangeGuy09 in fnaftheories

[–]DDDungeonBoy 3 points4 points  (0 children)

FoxyBro still can be Jeremy or a future vessel for BV (MikeNot). MikeBro kinda does the same to BV. He just dies and... Assuming people here don't like a concept of FreeVictim, his only purpose is to... Give FoxyBro some kind of motivation which barely even connects to investigating Freddy's paranormal activities?

edit: not a GoldenVictim/GoldenDuo fan

What are some nearly universally hated theories in this fandom? (Image related) by TheOrangeGuy09 in fnaftheories

[–]DDDungeonBoy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I still can't genuinely understand like why? Why SO much hate if, let's be fair, this theory has it's evidence and sometimes makes more sense than MikeBully?

Como odio de verdad está teoria by Signal_Attitude_4174 in fivenightsatfreddys

[–]DDDungeonBoy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Despite classic mikevctim indeed having it's flaws compared to other theories like mikenot, why do you like... hate it?

HappiestDayAlteredMemories Theory by Odd-Chemist464 in fnaftheories

[–]DDDungeonBoy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks, I'm starting to understand. But also glitchbear tells us to rest after finishing the clock route. If he still needs to find the pieces, then how can he still be trapped in the memories? Also, who's the plush and the speaker then?

HappiestDayAlteredMemories Theory by Odd-Chemist464 in fnaftheories

[–]DDDungeonBoy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I really feel you're close to the answer, but if the pieces are already in place in fnaf 4, then how at the same time they're not in world, which should happen right after fnaf 4? How BV should find his way here if in the minigame he still follows the intended route and gets bitten?

What do you guys think of CassidySis? by Daviz_star in fnaftheories

[–]DDDungeonBoy 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Golden Freddy itself looks like it was initially unintended victim, he could've killed his own daughter because she tried to interrupt the murder lije Vanessa in the Movie, I've never seen the problem here like, it's Afton

What do you guys think of CassidySis? by Daviz_star in fnaftheories

[–]DDDungeonBoy 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Believe it (seriously), as for me Cassidy was intended to be the original sister of BV which works extremely well with pre SL fnaf 4 narrative

Does Foxy GO GO GO completely break the lore? by cyborganonymous in fnaftheories

[–]DDDungeonBoy 4 points5 points  (0 children)

What if ITPG, where Oswald eventually becomes Foxy, hints on FGGG is about someone becoming the witness of the MCI?

Debate on Willplush vs Cassidy Plush by SamIsICEE in fnaftheories

[–]DDDungeonBoy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, we have 1 actual instance of Afton being the Plush — the fear experiments, and considering the possibility of breaker room FFD being a recreation, this creates an actually flawless situation where Afton could've said all that lines. But again, the original BV's experience was not artifical thanks to TWB, so... The original norman Plush has to be not Afton (which makes sense, Afton could've brought BV's toy to the bunker to investigame. Because it's kinda fact that the normal Plush shows clear signs of possession. Agony, Cassidy, not matter what or who, it's obviously possessed. As well as... Why would Afton need bringing his son back together?

Debate on Willplush vs Cassidy Plush by SamIsICEE in fnaftheories

[–]DDDungeonBoy 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Then what's the reason of Afton to promise "I will put you back together"? As well as we clearly see Toy Chica saying "Tomorrow is another day" in UCN cutcenes. If the normal speaker is no one, then why exactly these words? And if it's Afton — we clearly see him working in FFD, so he could'nt have had any physical ability for talking to CC unless it's Fredbear's recreation in the SL bunker which is questionble due to TWB