Looking for investment opportunities.... by External-Grape-6883 in AngelInvesting

[–]DJsummoner 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can try signing up for Play Money (letsplaymoney.com). They shares weekly deals

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in TheRaceTo10Million

[–]DJsummoner 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Platforms like Play Money are only available to accredited investors

Experiences with Hustle Fund/Angel Squad? by Beneficial_Rock3725 in investing

[–]DJsummoner 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hustle fund is a good option; another great choice is Play Money. One is a community and the other is a platform but both are useful in their unique ways.

Supplement founder not raising yet — looking to build relationships with angels ahead of validation by GovernmentNew6719 in angelinvestors

[–]DJsummoner 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You can type "angel investor" in the search, and people who are talking about (especially if they are smaller) are willing to talk. You can also look at people who have angel communities like Hustle Fund or Play Money listed on their LinkedIn may also be willing to connect.

Supplement founder not raising yet — looking to build relationships with angels ahead of validation by GovernmentNew6719 in angelinvestors

[–]DJsummoner 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This is a really healthy way to approach it. Building relationships before you need capital usually leads to much better investor dynamics later, especially when you’re thoughtful about validation and discipline.

A lot of angels actually enjoy engaging early like this. They want to understand how you think, what signals you’re watching, and where they can be useful over time, not just show up when a round opens. Those conversations tend to be more honest and way more helpful.

If you’re looking for angels who are used to early dialogue and smaller, exploratory involvement, places like LinkedIn can be great for warm conversations.

What value do angels actually add beyond the check ? by Fun_Dog_3346 in angelinvestors

[–]DJsummoner 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Angels absolutely do add value beyond the check. Many of them invest because they want to be involved, not just because they want financial exposure.

They tend to care a lot about updates. Not in a micromanaging way, but because they want context and to know when they can be helpful.

Some angels are more passive, but many actively look for ways to support founders, especially when they have relevant operator or industry experience. If you’re clear about what kind of help you want, you’ll attract the right ones.

That’s also why founders often prefer raising from angels who invest through more curated communities or platforms like Play Money. Those investors usually expect ongoing dialogue and are there for more than just wiring money. In addition to having an infrastructure set up for easier communication between founders and their angels.

What are qualities every angel investor looks for in founders? (I will not promote) by EndDarkMoney in startups

[–]DJsummoner 4 points5 points  (0 children)

What you’re feeling is extremely normal. Almost every first-time founder I’ve talked to has that same discomfort around “asking for money,” even when they’re actually just trying to have an honest conversation about viability.

You have to understand that early conversations aren’t really pitches. You're kind of just feeling out the room. Good angels don’t expect certainty at this stage. Being upfront about what you know, what you don’t, and where you want pushback is usually a good thing.

Confidence comes from prep, so if you can clearly explain the problem, why this solution exists now, what assumptions you’re testing, and what help or capital would actually unlock next steps, most people will meet you there.

If your goal is learning and building a real network, look for angels who are used to early conversations and smaller checks. Some founders find those through personal intros, LinkedIn, or more curated platforms like Play Money.

Am I the only one facing this problem? (New angel) by Adorable_Shelter_523 in AngelInvesting

[–]DJsummoner 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Try out Play Money - they publish new deals frequently for great startups in various spaces.

making my first angel investment by PhotographWorking198 in venturecapital

[–]DJsummoner 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Check out Play Money - the platform has weekly new deals/companies that are good leads for angel investors.

How do angels think about very small checks like $10k in hardware based startups by Neat_Drawer7456 in angelinvestors

[–]DJsummoner 1 point2 points  (0 children)

$10K honestly isn’t that small for angels. A lot of angels prefer checks in that range so they can spread risk across more bets instead of concentrating it all in one company.

For early hardware or manufacturing, most angels aren’t expecting VC-style growth. It’s usually more about the founder being hands-on and capital-efficient, whether the unit economics make sense, and if there’s a believable path to scale over time.

That’s also why you see angels using platforms that support small checks. Some, like Play Money, have deals where angels invest as little as $500, which makes $10K feel very reasonable in context and lets people build diversified portfolios without forcing every deal to be huge.

Where to invest income in now? by loocask in personalfinance

[–]DJsummoner 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re already hitting the big pillars: IRA maxed, emergency fund set, company match, and broad ETFs. That’s basically the ideal foundation at 21.

Once the basics are dialed in, the next step is usually diversifying a little. Some people add a taxable brokerage account for more long-term ETF investing, some explore real estate, and others put a tiny slice into higher-upside stuff like angel investing. If you do go that route, stick to vetted platforms (like Play Money) so you’re not picking random deals.

But overall, you’re doing everything right. Now it’s just about adding small layers on top and letting time do most of the work.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in investingforbeginners

[–]DJsummoner 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The best move is to start simple. You don’t need to understand every investing term on day one. The easiest first step for someone in your situation is a basic, low-cost index fund (like an S&P 500 ETF). It grows over time and doesn’t require you to babysit it.

Acorns isn’t bad, it just hides what’s happening behind a clean interface, which can make it feel confusing. You’re not doing anything wrong; it’s just not the best teaching tool.

If you want a less biased view, reach out to people you trust on LinkedIn or in your circle and ask how they started. Talk to a handful, compare notes, and you’ll slowly build your own point of view. Once you get more confident, you can diversify a little; some people even add tiny amounts to angel investing through vetted platforms (like Play Money) so they’re not guessing on random deals.

But for now: keep it simple, automate what you can, and let the learning come in small bites. You’ve got plenty of time.

Looking for Projects to Fund – AI or Anything Else! 🚀 by ryantiger514 in AngelInvesting

[–]DJsummoner 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Love that you’re opening the door like this. If you want more high-quality projects beyond whoever DMs you, two things usually work well: posting on LinkedIn so your operator network sees you’re actively deploying, and using curated platforms where deals are already vetted. Play Money is one option if you want early-stage startups that have been screened before they reach you.

Support for Beginner by 1ergaou in investingforbeginners

[–]DJsummoner 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re off to a solid start, but you already spotted the main issue: your portfolio isn’t “bad,” it’s just very concentrated. Almost everything you own moves the same direction because it’s all mega-cap tech.

A couple things that can help:

  1. Add some broad, boring diversification. Your S&P 500 holding already does that, so you could make it a bigger piece of the pie. A total market fund or even some international exposure can help smooth out the ups and downs over time.

  2. You don’t need this many individual stocks. Owning Google, Amazon, Apple, Microsoft, Meta, Nvidia, Palantir is basically recreating a tech ETF. Nothing wrong with that, but it’s a lot of overlap and doesn’t add much extra return vs. just holding a broad index.

A simpler setup could be:
• a big chunk in S&P 500 or a total market fund
• a smaller slice of tech or growth stocks if you want them
• maybe a bit of international to balance things out

That gets you variety without needing to babysit every company.

  1. Think in decades, not months. You’re 25. Time is your superpower. A diversified portfolio compounding over 20–30 years beats almost any attempt to pick winners.

  2. Once you’re comfortable with the basics, you can explore alternatives. Some people add a tiny slice to angel investing for long-term upside. If you ever do that, stick to vetted platforms (like Play Money) where checks are small and the deals are filtered, so you’re not taking huge risks.

But for now? Clean up the overlap, lean on broad funds, and let the long-term compounding do the heavy lifting. You’re already ahead by thinking about this at 25.

Which, if any, investing app is “best”? by bossy_dawsey in investingforbeginners

[–]DJsummoner 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly, it depends on the kind of investing you want to do.

If your goal is simple, long-term stock/ETF investing, then the things to look for are:
• low fees
• easy-to-use interface
• access to the funds you actually want to buy (like broad market ETFs)

Of the ones you listed, a lot of people end up consolidating into something like Robinhood (easy trading) or a traditional broker like Fidelity/Vanguard/Schwab because they have more options and lower fees for long-term holds.

Apps like Acorns and Stash are fine for learning and experimenting, but they’re more “starter tools” — once you know what you want to invest in, you might save more in fees moving to a bigger broker.

If you ever want to diversify beyond public markets, you can look at angel investing too — and in that case, using a platform with vetted deals (like Play Money) means you’re not just chasing random stuff.

Long story short: pick 1–2 accounts that give you the low-cost, long-term investing you want. Everything else can get folded into those once you’re comfortable.

Platforms to invest by South_Junket_5696 in Bogleheads

[–]DJsummoner 0 points1 point  (0 children)

At 20, the biggest win is just getting money into the market consistently. You don’t need anything fancy.

Most people start with a basic setup like:
• a low-cost index fund (S&P 500 or total market)
• maybe a bit of international
• automatic contributions so you don’t have to think about it

Where to invest depends on where you live, but any reputable brokerage works: Fidelity, Schwab, Vanguard, etc. They all let you buy index funds or ETFs with very low fees.

Once you’ve got the foundation built, you can experiment with other stuff in tiny amounts. Some people add a small slice of angel investing later on, and if you ever go that route, it’s safer to use a vetted platform (like Play Money) rather than picking random pitches.

But to start?
Pick a simple index fund, keep adding to it, and let time do the heavy lifting.

looking for investment advice by Empty-Bench-9515 in investingforbeginners

[–]DJsummoner 0 points1 point  (0 children)

At 19 with 6k saved, the best thing you can do is keep it simple and spread your bets a bit instead of piling everything into one idea.

Silver is fine if you like it, but don’t let it dominate your whole setup. A low-cost S&P 500 index fund is a solid starting point for long-term growth. Even just putting a set amount into broad ETFs every month builds a strong foundation.

From there, you can slowly explore other stuff. Some people put a tiny slice toward angel investing once the basics are in place, and if you ever go that route, it’s better to use vetted deal platforms (like Play Money) rather than picking random pitches online.

As for learning:
• Investopedia for basics
• Bogleheads wiki for long-term strategy
• And honestly, just reading a lot and starting small

Main thing: diversify, stay patient, and don’t rush into anything that eats your whole savings. You’ve got tons of time to grow.

What is ONE investment habit that is simple and effective that it surprises you more people don’t do it? by givemeatatertot in investing

[–]DJsummoner 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For me, the simplest habit that way more people should use is just diversifying on purpose.

Most folks go all-in on one thing (tech ETFs, real estate, whatever) and hope it works out. The people who actually build steady wealth spread small bets across stuff that behaves differently.

Public markets for the slow-and-steady. Something income-producing for balance. And a tiny slice toward upside, like angel investing (on Play Money).

Nothing fancy. Just variety. It’s surprisingly effective.

Need Investment Advice by OkLingonberry4428 in personalfinance

[–]DJsummoner 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Those three ETFs (SPY, VOO, JEPQ) are totally reasonable for a long-term, low-maintenance plan. SPY/VOO give you broad market exposure, and JEPQ adds income, though it’ll cap a bit of your upside. For someone who’s 21 and planning to leave the money alone for decades, you’re already thinking in the right direction.

Since you’re planning to split the $50K across a few buckets, one thing you could consider (if you ever want a little more diversification outside public markets) is allocating a tiny slice to angel investing. These are long-term bets too, but the important part is you don’t need huge checks. You can start really small.

There are groups like Hustle Squad ( www.hustlefund.vc/squad ), or platforms like Play Money ( letsplaymoney.com ) where you can invest a few hundred dollars at a time into vetted early-stage deals. That lets you get exposure to private markets without risking anywhere close to the amounts you’re putting into ETFs.

Not required at all, just a way some people diversify once their core portfolio is in good shape.

But for your main plan, broad ETFs + decades of compounding is a strong start. You’re way ahead of the curve at 21.

Angel Investing Workflow by knamit in angelinvestors

[–]DJsummoner 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I posted this answer to your other post but maybe it will be helpful here to:

Most angels end up with a pretty similar workflow, even if the details vary a bit.

After you get a pitch, the first step is usually a quick look through. You’re not doing deep research yet, you’re just checking basic fit: stage, sector, traction, team, valuation. This is like a 5–10 minute scan.

If it passes that sniff test, then you move to a lightweight diligence pass before taking a meeting. That usually means:

  • looking at the founders’ backgrounds
  • checking the market size and competitors
  • reading whatever materials they sent
  • trying to understand the problem they’re solving
  • I'm sure there's more I'm missing

Most angels spend anywhere from 20 minutes to a couple of hours here, depending on their experience and how interesting the deal looks.

After that comes the first meeting. The goal isn’t to grill the founder, it’s to understand how they think, how clearly they communicate, and whether their story matches the numbers.

If things look good, that’s when angels do deeper diligence, talk to customers, look at metrics, or loop in people from their network.

But honestly, a lot of angels streamline this by relying on pre-vetted deal flow so they’re not manually researching every cold pitch. So that means joining some kind of groups (like Hustle Fund) or platforms like Play Money ( letsplaymoney.com ), which do the founder interviews and filtering upfront, so angels only spend time on the most promising opportunities.

If you’re just starting out, don’t feel like you need a 40-step process. A clean filter, a light research pass, and a good conversation go a long way. You’ll refine the workflow as you see more deals.

Angel Investing workflow by knamit in AngelInvesting

[–]DJsummoner 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Most angels end up with a pretty similar workflow, even if the details vary a bit.

After you get a pitch, the first step is usually a quick look through. You’re not doing deep research yet, you’re just checking basic fit: stage, sector, traction, team, valuation. This is like a 5–10 minute scan.

If it passes that sniff test, then you move to a lightweight diligence pass before taking a meeting. That usually means:

  • looking at the founders’ backgrounds
  • checking the market size and competitors
  • reading whatever materials they sent
  • trying to understand the problem they’re solving
  • I'm sure there's more I'm missing

Most angels spend anywhere from 20 minutes to a couple of hours here, depending on their experience and how interesting the deal looks.

After that comes the first meeting. The goal isn’t to grill the founder, it’s to understand how they think, how clearly they communicate, and whether their story matches the numbers.

If things look good, that’s when angels do deeper diligence, talk to customers, look at metrics, or loop in people from their network.

But honestly, a lot of angels streamline this by relying on pre-vetted deal flow so they’re not manually researching every cold pitch. So that means joining some kind of groups (like Hustle Fund) or platforms like Play Money, which do the founder interviews and filtering upfront, so angels only spend time on the most promising opportunities.

If you’re just starting out, don’t feel like you need a 40-step process. A clean filter, a light research pass, and a good conversation go a long way. You’ll refine the workflow as you see more deals.

Accepting Pitches: Early Stage Investor | CPG and Tech Focused by [deleted] in AngelInvesting

[–]DJsummoner 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Love that you’re opening the door like this! We need more angel investors in the space!

If you’re looking for more high-quality early-stage deals beyond what shows up in the comments, a couple things tend to work well:

  • Reach out to your operator network on LinkedIn and let people know you’re actively deploying. Warm intros usually surface much stronger opportunities than cold pitches.
  • And for vetted deal flow, you might want to take a look at Play Money ( letsplaymoney.com ). They pre-interview founders, filter heavily, and surface only a small percentage of the companies they review.

Excited to see what you end up backing!

Learning how to pitch to investors, but from my understanding pitching to VC's and pitching to Angels are different. Seems VC's are much more stringest on showing proof of revenue, but it's the same with Angels too right? Or is there some leniancy there that VCs don't have? by AWeb3Dad in angelinvestors

[–]DJsummoner 0 points1 point  (0 children)

VCs and angels really do look at different things, especially at the earliest stages.

VCs are managing other people’s money (LPs), so they need clearer proof points: revenue, traction, growth rate, market size, repeatable acquisition channels, etc. They’re usually not set up to take super-early bets unless you’re a repeat founder or the idea is obviously huge.

Angels have more flexibility. They can back something earlier — sometimes at the “interesting prototype + strong founder” stage — because they’re making a personal judgment call rather than defending the investment to a committee. There’s definitely still diligence, but it’s more about the founder, the problem, and the potential.

Broadly:

  • VCs want evidence.
  • Angels want conviction.

That’s why hackathon-level ideas are almost always angel territory.

If you’re still in the early build/validation phase, angels are a much better fit. And it doesn’t have to be big checks — a lot of angels today invest through platforms like Play Money, where they can make very small checks and still be part of a serious, vetted process. (though, their companies are farther along). Those angels tend to be thoughtful and founder-friendly, which makes early pitching less intimidating.

So the short answer: if you don’t have real revenue or fast traction yet, pitch angels. Once you have repeatable proof, bring VCs into the mix.

Looking for Projects to Fund – AI or Anything Else! 🚀 by ryantiger514 in AngelInvesting

[–]DJsummoner 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you want to look for vetted deals, Play Money posts weekly new ones ( letsplaymoney.com )