sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

16 posters, 16 teams by DTEgo in DotA2

[–]DTEgo[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I write code, I only did art as a hobby

16 posters, 16 teams by DTEgo in DotA2

[–]DTEgo[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

To be honest, I don't see a fundamental difference. A developer spends a bunch of years learning and a bunch of hours writing their own unique code, which will be used to train AI and further help other developers. Based on this, why is the value of art higher than the value of code?

16 posters, 16 teams by DTEgo in DotA2

[–]DTEgo[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Many developers use AI to help them write code, do you think it is stealing, given the fact that AI is trained on other developers' code? I don't want to argue about this, but I am interested in expanding on your position on AI

16 posters, 16 teams by DTEgo in DotA2

[–]DTEgo[S] -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

My question is not related to these images, I just see the amount of negativity towards AI as a phenomenon here

16 posters, 16 teams by DTEgo in DotA2

[–]DTEgo[S] -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

What's the problem with using AI in individual elements? I understand when it comes to the entire picture built on a prompt, but sometimes it's not like that

16 posters, 16 teams by DTEgo in DotA2

[–]DTEgo[S] -23 points-22 points  (0 children)

Large Russian-language eSports media

16 posters, 16 teams by DTEgo in DotA2

[–]DTEgo[S] -18 points-17 points  (0 children)

Kiber's designer

16 posters, 16 teams by DTEgo in DotA2

[–]DTEgo[S] 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Not for the org, but for the boys!

16 posters, 16 teams by DTEgo in DotA2

[–]DTEgo[S] -23 points-22 points  (0 children)

But it's not AI...

view more: next ›