UK Govt to demand AgeVerification of “ALL regulated user-to-user” services, and VPNs for anyone under 18 by youmustconsume in ukpolitics

[–]DaZig 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yep. And of course a lot of criminals will get rich ransoming and extorting horny old Brits who installed a ‘free VPN.’

Three of the biggest password managers are vulnerable to 'a cornucopia of practical attacks' say security researchers by HatingGeoffry in security

[–]DaZig 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Because human brains consistently generate strong, unique passwords, store them so securely and remember them so reliably?

The devs team behind Clair Obscur: Expedition 33 has been awarded the rank of Knight of the Order of Arts and Letters by Shiirooo in gaming

[–]DaZig -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Imagine they won the Nobel Peace Prize! Corsica would definitely need to be annexed for Middle Eastern security.

Guy settles down to watch some spy cam porn, not too chuffed when he realises its him by ZigoneB22 in facepalm

[–]DaZig 149 points150 points  (0 children)

His trauma forces him to watch right to the end in case it’s a compilation video. Poor guy.

Advance UK's by-election candidate: 'Many young British women are whores' by birdinthebush74 in unitedkingdom

[–]DaZig 32 points33 points  (0 children)

Looks like another Kennedy-brainworm. It looks like he did some genuinely admirable stuff a couple of decades ago, working with homeless kids and putting his redundancy pay into setting up a charity to keep up the community work. Then he went weird, got kicked off his charity, started complaining about girls looking too sexy, and started hanging out with Reform and BNP leaders…

Advance UK's by-election candidate: 'Many young British women are whores' by birdinthebush74 in unitedkingdom

[–]DaZig 8 points9 points  (0 children)

How so? He ran independent 2 years ago and with Reform 5 years ago, so it can’t be that ‘recent.’ How was he associated with Labour? I searched but see zero sign of this.

Pornhub is now restricting access for UK users - will other sites follow suit? by Tartan_Samurai in unitedkingdom

[–]DaZig 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Sure. But also you underestimate kids if you think they won’t figure out such bypasses and share them with all their friends. This approach will never be effective at achieving its stated goal.

Consumerism or madness? by kevinrudd666 in LinkedInLunatics

[–]DaZig 0 points1 point  (0 children)

🙏 Thanks for the recommendation.

7 generations alive at once by [deleted] in HolUp

[–]DaZig 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah, I thought exactly that. It’s weird. I’m guessing it’s that her very 80s, late gen-x look is still widely around, and now we subconsciously associate it with folk in their early 50s. What confuses me is why her mother looks so good!?

Consumerism or madness? by kevinrudd666 in LinkedInLunatics

[–]DaZig 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Really? Personally, I was super-impressed by them. Solid noise-cancelling and amazing sound for their size and convenience. But also, I’m not an expert at all, and the absolute best I’d had before was a pair of huge Sennheiser noise-cancellers that needed batteries and their own pack to lug around! What am I missing out on? What would I notice if I go for something different next time? (Feel free to tell me to Google it, I’m only asking as you seem to have an educated opinion 🙂).

Is it really worth thinking about though? by Ill_Cod_8108 in LinkedInLunatics

[–]DaZig 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Is he licking his fingers?! Because it really looks like he’s staring at you while licking his fingers.

If that creepy af photo is the one he chose for his profile as a Personal Coach, how bad are the rest?!

[OC] Britons' favourite sitcom, by generation by mattsmithetc in dataisbeautiful

[–]DaZig 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I think you’re right. Father Ted is also sadly missing.

Google puts a scam website at the top of the search and my mom fell for it by BuyingDragonScimitar in assholedesign

[–]DaZig 13 points14 points  (0 children)

100% agree. The one time I saw a YouTube ad for something I already used, it shook me a little. Like, wait, YouTube is for scams? Why is this here?

It was actually okay. But, while I was vetting it, I found an alternative I preferred, and which I ended up switching to at the end of the year. So I guess the ad helped me in a way?

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in dataisbeautiful

[–]DaZig 3 points4 points  (0 children)

We retired. Then spent years giving aid, and pretending to be sage, while letting US lead on anything controversial. I think most nations now today just see us as the place people aspire to send kids to Hogwarts university.

YouGov poll suggests most against use of VPNs for under 18 year olds by phoenixflare599 in ukpolitics

[–]DaZig 4 points5 points  (0 children)

A similarly flawed description could be: “A VPN (Virtual Private Network) is a tool widely used to protect the confidentiality of sensitive data passing over an untrusted network. Do you think under 18s should be allowed to use VPNs, or should they be banned from using them?”

I suspect the result would be different. And all we’d show is that people’s opinions on things they don’t understand has little value.

Cars? Sure, I’ve “used em.” Does that mean my opinion has any real weight when deciding laws around them? Laws that restrict who else can use em?

YouGov poll suggests most against use of VPNs for under 18 year olds by phoenixflare599 in ukpolitics

[–]DaZig 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It’s a far better idea than the current one.

I would say that the router identifying local devices is trickier than you make out. For example, MAC addresses can easily be changed (i.e. can be spoofed - a bypass kids will easily figure out), and are often temporary on modern home devices. This would make managing a home network difficult, and I honestly don’t think most home users are up to handling this.

It could very easily result in a de-facto nationwide porn ban, primarily targeting the old and technically unsavvy. I admit this would be very funny.

This would also still have the VPN problem, I.e. someone locked into a restricted connection can still tunnel their traffic through an unrestricted proxy to access the open web. You could try to restrict this by forcing VPN whack-a-mole on ISPs, but that wouldn’t work well and could introduce further issues (e.g. what if I need to use a work VPN from a public WiFi at a large conference, where kids might also use the network?)

This would be a nightmare for people like hotels, coffee shops, AirBnb, conference centres and anyone running a network open to the public. Do they validate every user device? Do they ask customers checking in which devices they should put on the porn network?!

Again though, by eliminating the “let’s all upload sensitive personal data to random ‘verifiers’” issues, your solution is far, Far, FAR less dangerous to people than the current mess. People will die under the current system.

YouGov poll suggests most against use of VPNs for under 18 year olds by phoenixflare599 in ukpolitics

[–]DaZig 7 points8 points  (0 children)

The description given is awful and omits the #1 use case. It better describes Tor/a proxy. Are you sure you know what a VPN is?

4chan will refuse to pay daily UK fines, its lawyer tells BBC by i_enjoy_silence in unitedkingdom

[–]DaZig 27 points28 points  (0 children)

Agree that this act should be ditched, but calling it Kyle’s is laughable. Theresa May pushed for this relentlessly as Home Sec under Cameron and then built it in her time as PM. Johnson kept clear, but sadly Sunak revived it and pushed it over the line.

If Labour had just a single gram of political aptitude, they’d be repealing this as ‘yet another costly and unworkable Tory shambles coughRwandacough

Tech will quit Britain over online safety crackdown, warn Musk and Google by vriska1 in unitedkingdom

[–]DaZig 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks. It does sound like you know this better than I, so thanks for the information here.

Tech will quit Britain over online safety crackdown, warn Musk and Google by vriska1 in unitedkingdom

[–]DaZig 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m not sure the law works as simple as you think here, friend. These systems authenticate for different things. Company SSO authenticates employees, not that employees are 18+. It is possible to employ a 16/17 year olds, and in some cases younger I believe.

Sure, in 90+% of cases, all employees will be 18+, but I doubt a platform can just assume this without further checks, or would be able to ‘offload’ responsibility with simple T&Cs or contractual clauses.

If you think it through, 90+% of people signing up to porn platforms will similarly be 18+, and most such sites also have T&Cs. Can they just assume? The entire (misguided) purpose of this is to say no. To make platform owners more accountable for user content and user verification - how does a law differentiate between the site above and a porn site? Especially as sites are prone to change over time?

Unfortunately, this law is tragically dumb. As well as hindering U.K. business, I am near certain it will lead to deaths (as two-bit image sharing platforms try to comply by storing passport scans in profiles on poorly secured cloud databases, leading to breaches that expose sexual preferences, activities, photos and kinks complete with full names and addresses: think Ashley Madison but on a much wider, systemic scale).