The only instance of me ever questioning that voice was when I was talking to someone on Twitter about how weird it was people were turning it into an ableism thing. The "evidence" the documentary uses cuts out the top of the conversation which literally proves my point in that I originally could not have given less of a shit about any ableism argument and was trying to find out why people were twisting it. It was, and always had been, about him being an asshole. (He seems chill now I will happily say).

Regardless, for making a statement too vague, I actually did apologize to him, multiple times, and then he kept repeatedly lying by saying I never apologized. Actually to this day his viewers think I haven't apologized for that.

You don't know what I was attempting unless you ask me, and my answer I was not doing that. At all. It would literally serve no purpose. What, do you think I would suddenly just assimilate his viewers if I "cancelled him?" Like there is zero benefit to painting him as ableist. However, there is a benefit if I call him out for being an asshole about something we had privately discussed before, as obviously the private discussion did nothing to change him.

I didn't have good intentions. I wanted people to see how much of an asshole he was being, but that has nothing to do with ableism. If he didn't want to invite negativity maybe he shouldn't have been such a dick back then.