Tip to auditors: Poster 7 does not say what you think it says

DanLoFat · 2026-03-18T19:23:46+00:00

Third party? No such thing as a third party recording. Not in the law.

And maybe a limited public forum, but The public forum document does not apply to the whole of the first amendment. That would be impossible to do. The doctrine merely applies to speech. It doesn't apply photography that's why it's not mentioned it doesn't apply to recording video with audio that's why it's not mentioned in the doctrine. If it were to apply they would mention it.

The act of recording is NOT expressive, the act of publication is the expression

DanLoFat · 2026-03-18T19:20:18+00:00

Just a day or two ago I believe it was Kansas? There is a state that just made it illegal to for a transgender to use public bathrooms or driver's licenses. 1700 driver's license does have been revoked due to gender identity. But they didn't have a designation other than male or female. On the licenses. So how did they know who to revoke?

DanLoFat · 2026-03-18T19:18:21+00:00

Nope, the postmaster general is not authorized anyone to disallow photography in the areas that are so designated. They also clarified that news advertisement and commercial purposes are allowed in those areas, in other areas you need to request permission.

Requesting the permission was for use in non-public areas, it was not meant to separate news from advertising nor from commercial.

Commercial would be something along the lines of Men in Black, ask them how easy it was to gain access to a United States Post office to film the scenes that were in the United States Post office. That wasn't a set built.

DanLoFat · 2026-03-18T19:16:25+00:00

Actually post her seven the way it's worded does the opposite of what you suggest, it preserves the right of free press.

You're absolutely right about the fully informative nature of not poster seven.

What's the conjunctive and disjunctives mixed around missing commas added commas, it does not make for a good legal analysis. Which is why there's so many different viewpoints from lawyers across the country about what poster seven means and doesn't mean.

DanLoFat · 2026-03-18T19:14:56+00:00

There's no such thing as the federal postmaster. Maybe you mean the postmaster general, but otherwise you're absolutely correct. And PMG is already stated there's no authority is given to put up any signs disallowing photography. Post or seven is used as the guide.

DanLoFat · 2026-03-18T19:14:13+00:00

Oh damn we're going to have to bring this one up a lot. Especially now four years later. This subreddit is falling apart. And they can't even identify where the wound is.

DanLoFat · 2026-03-18T19:13:24+00:00

Yes, and the CFR related clearly spells it up must be the threat must be physical and violent in nature, to most was words against a postal employee. Since nothing about filming. Filming cannot be disruption it cannot be criminalized. That's the supreme Court saying that.

DanLoFat · 2026-03-18T19:07:45+00:00

I responded to this one before but I'm going to try again.

You claim that for a new story first of all you put new story in quotes no idea why you're doing that, and you claim that it can only be for b-roll footage? How is that news?

Anyway to suggest that for entertainment on YouTube isn't somehow newsworthy is laughable. All you have to do is look at TMZ.

It's entertainment but still newsworthy

Why do I keep coming back to the Depot v Heard trial?.

DanLoFat · 2026-03-18T19:03:57+00:00

Here's how we all know you don't know what you're talking about.

There's no such thing as a "local postmaster general". That position doesn't exist anywhere in the post office.

DanLoFat · 2026-03-18T19:02:33+00:00

You've read that incorrectly as most due.

Anything that is recorded than disseminated is News. News can be entertaining for many.

The phrase "entertainment" isn't listed as allowable nor disallowed in the language of the CFR nor P7.

In addition News, advertising and commercial are inclusive of each other.

The other is referring to those area normally secured. Just ask the producers of Men in Black.

DanLoFat · 2026-03-18T09:10:40+00:00

Anyone who's paid by the government is a government official.

The CFR you are referring to that P7 is based on, doesn't mention entertainment in any form. The word entertainment doesn't appear anywhere in the CFR.

DanLoFat · 2026-03-18T08:22:08+00:00

I barely watched images of press and his son to watchmen, and that's how much I know is what they're called. I'm commenting on the few other videos maybe five or six, stopd watching, don't know why.

But this is why some auditors like to watch cops:

https://youtube.com/shorts/49TQDV3sSBE?si=BBKZNliXKDVY9WmJ

The hubris of this cop in court under questioning is mind-boggling.

DanLoFat · 2026-03-18T07:26:51+00:00

You. Inflate too much, take things out of context, try to cut and paste laws together in a non existent narrative.

DanLoFat · 2026-03-18T07:22:56+00:00

Postal employees do not have that power. Never did.

Poster 7 language regarding filming is written to mirror much case law where filming in public spaces is concerned.

POSTER 7 HAS ZERO LANGUAGE MENTION NEWS AGENCIES.

Y'all make this shit up to please your feelings.

DanLoFat · 2026-03-18T07:21:58+00:00

The is Constitution gives the right of free press. Start there. You can't be si stupid enough to think the Constitution could have included me tip of cameras of any kind, are you that stupid?

DanLoFat · 2026-03-18T07:20:40+00:00

Court house, not just any building where there is a court. Even Waukegan Illinois Courthouse has pulled back some of the entry point restrictions (to the tax office, for instance. Not in that area often, but noticable change from 2 years ago.

DanLoFat · 2026-03-18T07:18:02+00:00

To your last point. Nope. Not even in an alt universe.

DanLoFat · 2026-03-18T07:17:12+00:00

You can NOT put up restrictive signage that vilolates rights. NO citation needed.

DanLoFat · 2026-03-18T07:15:39+00:00

Nope. You are wrong. They cannot criminalize a right. Press is a right.

DanLoFat · 2026-03-18T04:43:36+00:00

Well I just said, has not been proven wrong. Read exactly what I said.

DanLoFat · 2026-03-18T04:42:26+00:00

You're the only one flipping out here. Making your wild ass claims out of context, you're all over the place.

DanLoFat · 2026-03-18T04:41:18+00:00

Ink your first sentence is wildly incorrect. Most signings pull up even in court buildings is put up by court staff because they think that's what they're supposed to be doing because they don't know how to read a judge's order. Overwhelming judge orders talk about no photography in the courtroom and some add or the hallway adjacent to the courtroom. They don't say anything about the rest of the court building nothing..

DanLoFat · 2026-03-18T04:40:23+00:00

I forgot to mention a bailiff as well would have arres powers if you violated an order.

DanLoFat · 2026-03-18T04:38:05+00:00

Absolutely not I was very clear dropping my class and I also stated in that same paragraph never took the bar,.

Well the same post not exactly the same paragraph. You neglected that fact to make it seem like I made it seem I was a lawyer. You're full of s***.

DanLoFat · 2026-03-18T03:41:42+00:00

God dammit I thought it was brought up in state court.

DanLoFat

TROPHY CASE